Neomaxizoomdweebie

Then what would have been the point of the trade? If you believed both players had no future in Detroit and would be gone after a few years anyway, why do it? Your premise makes no sense.

It scares me to think that we're discussing Stutzle, or Drysdale, or Askarov. It means we haven't gotten our s**t together at any position.

Fabbri rules. Zadina drools.

Just realized the Rangers have started their 2nd quarter century without a Cup.

Why can't it be both?

No one. There are 2 empty seats. Is men wearing children's scarves so tight that it's choking them a thing in Germany?

"but he's top 6 F." Revoke his credentials. Fabbri and Biega trades were wins. The rest are losses. The only one I even remotely have concerns about is the Perlini trade. I really think that one could come back and haunt us.

How many points would he have on this roster tho? Not many. He's not a game changer at all. Larkin, Rasmussen, and Veleno would make him completely expendable in the long run. Sure, he might put up more than Flip and Frans now, but what difference would that really make? He was going to be here during the dark times anyway (if he stuck around at all). Jarnkrok wouldn't have kept the team competitive any longer then they were, wouldn't have kept them out of the cellar, wouldn't have prevented or shortened the rebuild, and would have been an inconsequential player by the time the team was competitive again anyway. So what did we really lose? A run of the mill player who would have been here during the gap between competitiveness. Still don't see how this was a loss.

176 points over 6 seasons. That's 30 points a season. Bottom 6 numbers. We have enough of those already. Like I said, not a big loss. And that trade wasnt made with the expectation that Legwand would produce as many points in his part season that Jarnkrok would over his entire career. That's an unfair comparison.

That's where my "pistol" stays 24/7.

If Jarnkrok was that good, he would've been brought up to fill the void at center. He wasn't, that's what facilitated the trade for Legwand. People wanna call that such a terrible trade, but if Jarnkrok was better than Legwand (he wasn't) it wouldn't have been made. It wasn't a big loss at all.

Awwwwwww. You're all playing nice. That's adorable.

Don't worry. He usually is.

Wrong answer.

Babcock, Gallant, and Laviolette are all available this summer. Who do you choose?

Hasn't Gallant taken bottom feeder coaching duties before? I figure there will be better opportunities for Laviolette, but I think Gallant is a real possibility.

I think top 6 is unrealistic. 3rd line RW sounds about right. Although Manthas injury may change that.

Fabbrina.

Basically a shaved head. Plus, not a HC.

Wrong answer.

You disagreeing with my opinion/beliefs makes you a hater. Where have I encountered this before?

That's a face of agreement BTW: why is it that every NHL coach either has a beautiful, full head of thick hair, or is completely shaved bald? Where is the normal "thinning hair, but not bad enough to shave my head" guys?

That sounds like college degree that a millenial would go into tens of thousands of dollars in school loan debt for.

Sorry. I guess that only applies to signs.

Should you not also be arguing in French then?