rick zombo

Member
  • Content Count

    5,725
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    55

Everything posted by rick zombo

  1. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    Very unimpressed with the Coyotes tonight. ​Bunch of butthurt D-bags.
  2. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    I was getting pizza. What the hell did Quincey do? Let me guess. Nothing?
  3. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    Sheahan. BULLET!!!!!!!!!! Screw you Yotes.
  4. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    ******* Bullduck. What an annoying bastard.
  5. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    Holy crap. The stick work by Arizona on that shift by Andersson’s line. Unreal. Yet they call that “hook” on Nyquist in the first.
  6. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    Sheahan’s line
  7. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    Amazing. A call.
  8. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    What a pile of s***.
  9. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    It’s called “Bettman-induced parity”
  10. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    Marvellous ******* officiating so far.
  11. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    Tampa lost to LA earlier today. This game’s for lead in the East!!!!! LGWs
  12. rick zombo

    2/7 GDT : Red Wings 3 at Coyotes 1

    Hope the Wings are ready for this one. Since Arizona aren’t likely to make the playoffs for another 5 years, it sound like they’re going to take a break from tanking, and treat this game like it’s for the cup. http://kuklaskorner.com/tmr/comments/red-wings-coyotes-morning-skate-tweets-and-articles
  13. rick zombo

    King henrik out a month

    Meh. Nashville were OK without Rinne (4-2-2). The Rangers should be OK without Lun"GQ"vist.
  14. rick zombo

    Do we need a trade to get our offence going ?

    Yeah the worse halves.
  15. rick zombo

    Do we need a trade to get our offence going ?

    For sure. I guess it shouldn't be assumed that intra-division trades won't happen. I just figure that if Detroit offers a 2nd and nashville offers a 2nd, that they'll deal him to the Preds.
  16. rick zombo

    Do we need a trade to get our offence going ?

    Then he shouldn't have gone there in the first place. I never feel bad for anyone that signs with the Leafs. Especially when you're a third line grinder who gets 5+M/per.
  17. rick zombo

    2/5 GDT - Red Wings 3 at Avalanche 0

    I remember that moment. It was great. Eliot looks like Bill Clement compared to Osgood.
  18. rick zombo

    Do we need a trade to get our offence going ?

    Totally. What this thread really needs is another of your epic four-part blockbuster trade scenarios.
  19. rick zombo

    Do we need a trade to get our offence going ?

    First off, we're all LGWs buddies here. This is all just specualtion and personal preference. Secondly, I have never underrated Franson in any of these discussions. I don't think I'm overrating Yandle either. Like I said, Yandle would probably cost a 1st + Larkin + a mid-level prospect . Franosn would cost less, but make no mistake, it would take a 1st for Detroit to get him over Nashville or Anahaim. Again, just speculating.
  20. rick zombo

    Gordie being honored in Saskatoon and he gets to be there

    So amazing. And yet some people (who may or may not be religiously invested and who may or may not hate science) still think stem cell research is a bad thing. It helps if your subject is Gordie Howe. The man's tougher than a boiled owl.
  21. rick zombo

    Do we need a trade to get our offence going ?

    Franson is inferior to Yandle. Franson is a rental. Franson has suitors in the West the Leafs would probably rather trade with. Rset assured, if Anaheim or Nashville are offering a 2nd +, Detroit will have to offer a 1st +. So if you want to talk about overpayment, then Franson's your guy.
  22. rick zombo

    Do we need a trade to get our offence going ?

    Because a) it's probably only overpayement in the eyes of Wings fans, b) he is exactly what this team needs on the back end, c) he's available and d) Arizona probably wants to move him to the East which means Detroit has less competition compared to trying to get a guy like Franson from a butthurt original six/division rival. We've bitched a moaned about adding an offensive, puck-moving D-man for three ******* years now. Illitch landed a jet in Suter's back yard and Chelios was probably flying the thing. Now we have the guy we need and he's available. Holland has done (mostly well) hanging on to picks and the organization has done a great job of drafting and devoping. They have a s***-ton of prosepects. Good prospects. Make a damn trade now. Take a stab at a couple of post-season runs while Zetterberg, Pavel, and Kronwall are still good players and are healthy. How hard is it to get behind this? Or are you mad because I said I might be OK moving Smith?
  23. rick zombo

    Do we need a trade to get our offence going ?

    I'd rather give up prospects/picks than any player off the current roster. Although I'd be OK with losing Smith. But not Helm. I'd also rather trade Larkin than Sheahan. But I'm very high on Sheahan and Larkin is four years away from being a Wing.
  24. rick zombo

    Do we need a trade to get our offence going ?

    Yeah I know, but you'd be getting two playoff runs with Yandle + Datsyuk + Zetterberg + Kronwall I'm glad I don't have to make these decisions.
  25. rick zombo

    2/5 GDT - Red Wings 3 at Avalanche 0

    Exactly. How can you compare a spot at the base of a mountain where some pioneer/settler stopped to take a dump to a city with as much culture and character and history as Detroit?