haroldsnepsts

HoF Booster Mod
  • Content Count

    14,265
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    87

Everything posted by haroldsnepsts

  1. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    don't you have any mouthwash? vanilla extract? rubbing alcohol??
  2. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    Hard to say. When Hudler came back from the KHL, he apparently didn't bring his game with him. All he's been good for this season is padding the other teams hitting stats. It's like he's wearing a bullseye instead of the winged wheel. I keep hoping he'll come around but we're a quarter of the way through the season and he's not showed signs of it returning.
  3. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    Nice play by E riding him into the boards.
  4. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    Agreed. I know he scored last night, but he's been pretty brutal otherwise. His game is just so limited, and it's finally starting to show.
  5. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    Kings are a fun team to watch, probably my second favorite in the league. Fast, hit, solid defensively, hard working. Don't get me wrong, I still hope they lose tonight.
  6. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    Mostly just about how the Wings need to keep the tempo up to match the Kings. It was a pretty quick interview.
  7. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    You said it was factual. It wasn't. The only part that was is Osgood is small. It's just funny to me that when it comes to Osgood, Crymson behaves exactly like the members here that he spends 99% of his time lecturing.
  8. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    It depends. Are you a pimp?
  9. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    that's why I put that one up! one of the ugliest of all time.
  10. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    Kings intermission interviewing Lids.
  11. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    Maybe if they were at Mardi Gras.
  12. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    Not quite. "Osgood is hopeless" isn't exactly a factual observation. Just because you agree with it doesn't make it accurate or factual.
  13. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    The nice thing about Datsyuk is if you can't get the pass to him, you can just pass to the guy covering him and Dats will go steal it.
  14. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    Maybe he doesn't want to be outdone by his old team.
  15. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    No, you suck now. The question is, will you suck in the future? Can't we actually have a GDT without obsessing about everything Osgood does?
  16. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    I forgot that when it comes to Osgood you turn into mindfly.
  17. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    The stupidest part is that's the mascot doing it. You can see him right behind the net where the goal judge used to sit, banging on the glass.
  18. haroldsnepsts

    12/4 GDT: Red Wings 2 at Kings 3 (OT)

    Yup. The Kings forecheck definitely throwing off the Wings puck possession game. Kings like to hit, but it's nice to see how it's inspired some of the Wings returning the favor, like Stuart.
  19. haroldsnepsts

    Henrik Zetterberg, Mr. 500

    He's doing that for Crosby, so Sidney can see what Stanley Cup finals-size balls look like.
  20. haroldsnepsts

    12/3 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Ducks 0

    wow, I somehow missed that story (I don't live in Detroit so don't read the Freep or anything). But did a quick search on the story. That's definitely got to be a distraction, especially when you're so far away from home.
  21. haroldsnepsts

    12/3 GDT: Red Wings 4 at Ducks 0

    Great game, especially for Jimmy. the Ducks actually played well (41 shots on goal??), the Wings just made them pay for turnovers. The score makes it look so much more lopsided than it actually was. The Wings were outshot, outhit, took more penalties, and the Ducks were better in the faceoff circle, but walk away with a 4-0 win. That's pretty great. Lidstrom didn't register on the scoresheet but was his usual awesome self defensively. I don't want to jinx it, but it seems like whatever is going on with Ericsson last season has stopped. He looked solid out there, playing more physical, making the simple play, and clearing the crease (though I still wish he would've hit the guy harder), and made a great play on Flips goal. The only players who I think had a couple cringe-worthy plays were Kronwall and Homer. Homer got the goal but made a couple terrible passes under pressure that handcuffed his defenseman that led to odd man rushes. All in all, great game.
  22. Shane Doan: No Movement Clause. $4.55 million salary. Captain of the Coyotes. You want to trade him for a struggling, slow undersized winger who has 6 points, is a -6, and has a 2.875 cap hit. And Kindl, who shows promise but is currently a prospect/7th dman. Don't see any obstacles with that trade?
  23. haroldsnepsts

    Kyle Quincey

    Shhh, why let facts get in the way? Crymson said he's never seen a hockey player have such an awful start after receiving a contract that was bigger than deserved, so we have to assume he started watching hockey only seconds before creating this thread.
  24. haroldsnepsts

    LGW's favorite player slewfoots Callahan

    seriously? that is what this whole thread is about?? I think Crosby is a very talented player, but I'd still like to punch his stupid douchey face. I think he's a whiny little *****. Talented player. Little *****. But that's barely a slew foot. It's two guys interfering with one another. Yeah, only Callahan got the penalty so it was a missed call. Big f-in deal.
  25. haroldsnepsts

    Kyle Quincey

    I actually have no grievance with them. Overall Holland and Jimmy D are the best in the business. It's just funny that you have this weird obsession with explaining away one of their few missteps. It's great to hear you're getting paid for it! Otherwise it would just be kind of sad.