haroldsnepsts

HoF Booster Mod
  • Content Count

    14,265
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    87

Everything posted by haroldsnepsts

  1. haroldsnepsts

    10/29 GDT: Ducks 5, Red Wings 4 (OT)

    Agreed. They're pretty awful. Saying Datsyuk was interfering Niedermayer from getting to the puck??? It's called having position. So they could've called Niedermayer for interference or hitting from behind.
  2. haroldsnepsts

    Who was/is your all time favourite goalie?

    hmm, I don't think I have a real favorite. I've always liked Brodeur, just because he's been rock solid for so long. Ron Hextall, the crazy bastard. And when I first really got into the Wings, I was a pretty big Glen Hanlon fan.
  3. haroldsnepsts

    worried about ozzie?

    I'd be worried if the team was playing well defensively and those were the numbers. Defensively speaking, this team hasn't looked itself since the start of the season.
  4. haroldsnepsts

    The NHL Should Change the Way it Shows its Games

    That wasn't meant as a jab or anything. I really would be curious to know your opinion after a whole game. Because for me honestly it became really frustrating watching it that way. The action is so far away a lot of the time.
  5. haroldsnepsts

    The NHL Should Change the Way it Shows its Games

    I thought those angles were terrible. I mean, they make for great secondary angles to cut to occasionally, especially on replays. But to watch a whole game that way drove me nuts. Especially the center ice camera. I've never felt so far away from the action while watching a game. As others have said, you couldn't really see plays develop that well, because you weren't above the action but you weren't on the ice either. It was this low angle that obscured a lot of the plays developing. To the original poster, I'd be curious to see if you felt the same after watching a whole game from those angles. Because honestly it is good to see highlights that way sometimes. But in terms of following the action for a full 60 minutes, it's awful.
  6. haroldsnepsts

    worried about ozzie?

    From what I've seen, Ozzie's been fine. He's given up a few more juicy rebounds than I'd like, but that's about it. And that's a bigger problem lately because the Wings opponents can pretty much come to the net at will. It's crazy how many times I've seen the Wings outnumbered in front of their own net.
  7. haroldsnepsts

    sammy

    Agreed. I think Sammy's been pretty good so far. There was the ill advised wrister from the blueline with no one in front of the net, but overall he's been good. And last night he and Lilja were the only ones playing with any real edge. Go figure. Last night while watching the game, it just sort of occurred to me that I bet Sammy is very coachable. I'm not sure why. Just a gut feeling. Babs wants him to take more shots, he definitely does that. He usually makes the consistent safe play with the puck. EDIT: as for Lids, i'm not too worried. This whole team has looked out of sync defensively, and Lidstrom is the keystone to the whole thing, so he's gonna look bad too. I thought he looked good last night. Raf was the one who had a couple bad beats.
  8. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    I gotta say, I had no real impression of Quincey before, but he looked really good tonight. I noticed him out there several times, and always for good reasons.
  9. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    Z! Wings make it look easy in the SO. Goalie bought the mule kick.
  10. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    Dats is money in the bank on a shootout. I almost feel bad for the goalie. almost.
  11. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    Agreed.
  12. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    blech.
  13. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    I have a feeling that after about half a season, Dats and Hossa are going to be making some ridiculous plays together. You can already see glimpses of it.
  14. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    Nice play by Kronner on Kopitar.
  15. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    Shoulda shot it Dats! you've got a great wrist shot! Great effort by Z!
  16. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    Uh, Lilja and Sammy have been our chippiest players tonight.
  17. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    Skate and dangle are not two words usually associated with Robitaille.
  18. haroldsnepsts

    Quincey > Meech/Lebda

    At this rate, Lebda would probably clear waivers.
  19. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    The goal was due to a freak deflection, but it was a still a great scoring chance the Wings gave up.
  20. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    I would shudder a little without Drapes. He's very good defensively still, a beast on faceoffs, and though he doesn't do it as much in the regular season, he had a lot of great hits in the playoffs. And he's still got pretty good speed.
  21. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    He does? I didn't know that.
  22. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    It's early yet, but remember that he's had two 40 point seasons. If he stays healthy, he could put up more. He's defensively responsible, and he's not afraid to go into corners. I'm not totally up on the relative value of contracts, but 2.5 mill for 40+ points and a good two-way forward seem reasonable.
  23. haroldsnepsts

    Lebda worst in the NHL

    No kidding. In tonight's game, Quincey>Lebda.
  24. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    Not controversial. Just wrong.
  25. haroldsnepsts

    10/27 GDT: Red Wings 4, Kings 3 (SO)

    I don't know if it's been brought up or not, but the Kings and Fox Sports West have what has to be the worst camera positions I've even seen in all my years of watching hockey. Seriously. they're like the alternate camera angles most networks have. Behind the net. Low along center ice boards. Could they only afford three cameras or something?