Majsheppard

f*** YOU!!!!

I am surprised they didn't call that goal off.

Leg to leg contact takes down Stuart, and the commentators are quick to call it a lost edge. ******* justice for Homer to score.

Slew foot.

That was the worst offsides call ever.

Why? Because he is plus 18? News flash, he plays with the best line in hockey. The only reason Nick is -1 is because he is a Dman playing with no top offensive line. You know he is the best Dman, so stfu.

They both always pick other people. Milbury picked Chara the last two years before this. I am surprised he didn't pick him. f*** them.

Also, don't you love how they show all offensive highlights for the Seleke trophy pick?

Knew they wouldn't give Nick any love.

Both needed to be called. Delay of game and a good hold, I have no problems with that. However I could have called two interference calls on them, but both would have been weak calls. We know that they aren't going to call as much because they are under the microscope for that one horrible call...

Did you ever notice anyone who starts a lame knock off tradition like this always comes up short in the playoffs? Vancouver just brought a curse upon themselves.

i bet mike does not pick lids for norris.

Why is everyone holding the puck so long and then making a horrible play. At LEAST make a horrible play quickly. There is no excuse for this.

Grrr, already Chicago is getting the calls here... (delay of game lol.) I say screw this game. I will watch to count power plays and bad calls.

I already hate this game.

I bet Chicago's stupid no goal is the difference maker, and we prob will get injured too. Eff this NHL. I am also taking bets on over or under 6 goals called off because of Homer's rep.

Now we know for sure, if this goal wasn't allowed Dallas would have controlled their own fate, and we could have sealed their fate ourselves. Wouldn't that have been nice to have a one game playoff with a fixed ability to bounce a mortal enemy???

There are teams we can beat, and there are teams we can't. The benefit of having the upper seeds is if we can beat one of the softer teams, then we can let other teams beat up on each other. That is the only way we advance if we play like s***. I hold out hope that given enough time we get on the ball. If we can luck out and play a worn out Vancouver or San Jose in the Conference finals we can win. Remember when we lost to the ducks, the only reason why was because we were worn out and missing Schneider.

Well forget second...

If San Jose gets one point and loses, then if we win without a shootout we would be looking at LA. I wouldn't mind that too much. Exactly, so I want the team missing as much firepower as possible. WE have to play a top 10 goalie no matter what. Well unless we play Chicago, but then we just get a team that loves to beat us.

If Phoenix gets a win, and the sharks get a point at least. Or Phoenix gets a point and San Jose gets a win... We lose to Chicago... we play them. I do NOT want that.

I am betting we end up in Nashville, and they beat us. I don't want to play the second best Goaltender in hockey, a team that has our number this year, an energy team, and a mean team. Sigh. s*** even worse... this opens the possibility of playing chicago.

There is not much time for someone to make a better scenario for us...

IF CHICAGO WINS: #5 Seed 1. Vancouver 2. San Jose 3. Detroit 4. Anaheim 5. Chicago 6. Nashville 7. Phoenix 8. Los Angeles IF CHICAGO LOSES IN OT/SO: #7 Seed 1. Vancouver 2. San Jose 3. Detroit 4. Anaheim 5. Nashville 6. Phoenix 7. Chicago 8. Los Angeles IF CHICAGO LOSES IN REG: #8 Seed/Out of Playoffs 1. Vancouver 2. San Jose 3. Detroit 4. Anaheim 5. Nashville 6. Phoenix 7. Los Angeles 8. Chicago/Dallas

I'd rather have LA because I actually think we can beat them. Phoenix has to show the hell up, and we do too. So I think we can right that one off.