krudmonk v2.0

Which goal was illegal and which was scored 5-on-3?

The Wings have insane amounts of poise. They are never emotionally affected by being down. They bounce back immediately and are dangerous on every play. Sharks won by the thinnest of margins.

Norco and Petaluma are two different towns in separate halves of the state, wise one.

They implemented to shootout to cater to the ignorant common man ("ties are homosexual communist terrorism"). They would take a step backwards on that front by using an insanely complicated point system. We don't want the stupids and their money to run away.

Of all the sensational things RW has said, I've never seen him follow up on any of them. I think he's just getting people riled up.

It looks cleaner. I hated how the logo used two different fonts before.

The newest and least-supported team in Canada versus the newest and least-supported team in California...and low ratings?!?!?1 OMG!!!!112

I don't feel like staying if Ducks fans are going to be here...

That's stupid.

Vintage Pronger: gooning it up and not being penalized. And everyone wouldn't stop fellating him over his newfound "maturity" last year. Yeah, right. It's the same old Pronger we've been booing for years. I hate this meathead.

Maybe it was Tie Domi who rubbed off on him...

Is this your first year watching hockey or has it only been that way here in California?

I should have stopped at "San Diego."

So having Kiprusoff makes the defense older and wiser? It makes Marleau care more? I'll keep that in mind.

If the Wings don't beat the damn Ducks, I'll have to hate them even more. I'm sure this is devastating news to everyone.

What kind of pandering is this? The Sharks aren't aggressive and obviously don't love to attack.

The Red Wings have adopted the octopus as a mascot, and that's always been dead. The only difference is that it was after the fact. As for history, they could have thrown a stop sign on the ice. It's about as closely related, plus it's red. If the Pavilion starts serving shark sushi, then I'll take issue.

Deserve a prize? Are you kidding me? I'm on the defense here. I was called out as having to look up matters concerning Chelsea which I allegedly didn't already know. All I have to know about the SPL is that two teams always win it and those two teams would rather join the EPL than make the Scottish League more competitive. Of course, and a Celtic fan, you probably think it's all totally fair and it's just by mere coincidence that clubs not named Celtic or Rangers never win. In that case, I take it back. Celtic and Rangers are the Yankees of soccer. Actually, they're worse. Have fun sitting on the edge of your seat, wondering which sides will finish first and second in your little league.

I was merely running with the theme. I didn't first write "yankees of soccer." Who the hell are you? The only person who follows the EPL? How the hell would I not have heard of Chelsea, its players or its owner? Get off the high horse. Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea are indeed analogous to the Yankees. They're the big four and will remain the big four. But hey, four is better than the three in Portugal and Holland or the two in that joke Scottish league.

So there are multiple "Yankees of soccer." Man U is definitely one of them.

Kaka dominates a poor ManUre back four and then Seedorf twists the knife. I think rain confuses United. This is great.

That would be AS Roma...

In Hasek's defense, I don't think he really saw the puck well on Clowe's goal. He went down to protect and still nearly had the width of the goal covered. On Cheechoo's goal, Hasek has to know that he's a shooter. I was actually surprised Cheechoo deked him. Going down early made some sense in the moment, but looked awful in hindsight.

I'm for your guys going east. Maybe it'll happen with the next expansion, haha...