I don't know about you but I have trouble seeing things when someone is standing right in front of me. You see that and I see an inconclusive shot from a poor camera angle. My red line is just as meaningless as yours. Around and around we go. What's next Doc?
Once again, you rant and rave about how Howard didn't see the shot, but why? What leads you to believe Howard couldn't see that? Cause you just thought so?
I see a camera angle and see that Howard likely saw the puck through Janik's legs. You see a camera angle, think it i inconclusive to anything, and make your opinion.
Cute, but meaningless. Though with the line you drew we can infer that Howard likely didn't see Jones's elbow due to Janik being in front of him.
Is Janik transparent? Howard's view was impeded by Janik.
Yeah, it proves Janik is standing in front of him but that doesn't automatically cause Howard to be unable to see anything that is in front of him at that point.