It is an argument keeps reappearing across discussions - if you gave Hudler more icetime, his performance would decline.
I will throw you a gauntlet - do you know of any actual case, throughout the NHL, where a player was given more ice time and his performance suffered as a result (all other parameter ideally remaining the same - linemates, proportion of ES / PP etc.)?
And as a side note, I offer another explanation for Hudler's limited ice-time: Is it too far-fetched to suspect that Babcock is limiting Huds ice-time to prevent him from getting more points and thus eliminating all possible chances of resigning him? I mean, given three more minutes (+20%), is it unreasonable to believe that Hudler's point total could climb into high seventies? How could you offer 2.5mil to a player with 78 points for the season?
edit: grammar, grrr.
unkempt
Member Since 19 Jan 2007Offline Last Active Dec 18 2009 05:23 PM




Find content
Not Telling

