kliq

To put this in context, in shocky's world the game of hockey has no goalies, and D doesnt matter, its simply who can hold the puck longer. If he is using the word "dominating" he's just looking at corsi because he's obsessed with it.

So in other words, Holland wants to trade AA for a young D-man lol.

If he's saying 2-5 new guys, I would have to think that the guys out the door/coming in would be: Booth out, Svech In XO out, Hicketts In Jensen out, ideally Dahlin in, I could see us moving one of Helm or Glendening in the off-season and bringing in Ras Nyquist (at deadline), bringing in Turgeon. That's my guess. What I want to see on this team is either young kids with upside, or vets who can help the young kids with upside. What I dont want to see is a ton of vets, or kids who have peaked and are nothing special. Vets I would love to move are Howard, Nyquist (at TDL), E, Nielsen, Kronwall (LTIR) and Helm Vets I would be ok keeping would be Abby, Z, Glendening, DD, Daley (though I would move any not named Z if a great offer came in). Kids I would like to keep are Bertuzzi, Mantha, AA, Larkin, Frk, Kids I would move because they are likely not getting much better are Jensen and XO.

Just watched a video on ESPN, apparently 4mil was raised for the families through a Go Fund Me. They said that Dion Pheneuf donated $10,000, or at least his name was listed for that amount.

12 years ago, 100% for sure! I havent played those games in years.

lol, at the end of every season I like to record what lines/pairings they rolled with. Typically I go with what they went with for the most part, if its playoffs I'll record what they had in their last game. I've been doing it since 2002.

I dont think we ever have to worry about this happening.

I really don't want to see LA win either. Nothing against them, but I like seeing new guys raise the cup for the first time. When its not your team, I feel there is nothing more unsatisfying then seeing a repeat of something you have already seen. But Ill take LA over Pittsburgh all day.

Daily Faceoff said on D they were rolling with DD/Daley, E/Jensen, Kronwall/XO but I thought they have been going with E/Daley, DD/Jensen, Kron/XO. Also, DF has AA centering the 4th with Booth on the 3rd which I'm almost sure is wrong. So is this right? DP 1 DP 2 DP 3 D1 Dan DeKeyser Jonathan Ericsson Niklas Kronwall D2 Trevor Daley Nick Jensen Xavier Ouellet Line 1 Line 2 Line 3 Line 4 LW Tyler Bertuzzi Darren Helm Andreas Athanasiou Martin Frk C Henrik Zetterberg Dylan Larkin Frans Nielsen Luke Glendening RW Gustav Nyquist Anthony Mantha Justin Abdelkader David Booth

Caps and Jets.

Does anyone know what the lines/pairings were tonight?

Didn't mean anything. Since we we only got 1 point we stay worse then Vancouver, and even if we lost in regulation we still wouldn't have passed Montreal. Today was a success from our end. Now had Arizona or Montreal won, different story.

I hope it happens!

They are in the playoffs despite Mrazek, not because of him. Stats don't lie, he sucked for them and almost blew their huge lead. Accept it, your golden boy sucks.

Well today was their biggest game of the year and they went with Elliot and he got a shutout, I think that speak volumes to who they are going to go with in the playoffs. I hope I'm wrong, but Mrazek really really sucked for them this year: PLAYER GP W L OTL GAA TOI SV SV% SHO TGA TSA PIM Michal Neuvirth 22 9 7 3 2.60 1038:43 485 .915 1 45 530 0 Brian Elliott 42 22 11 7 2.73 2462:33 1099 .908 0 112 1211 2 Alex Lyon 11 4 2 1 2.75 479:48 210 .905 0 22 232 0 Petr Mrazek† 17 6 6 3 3.22 913:11 401 .891 1 49 450 0

If we are looking to lose, too bad we dont still have Mrazek

Same here, but I dont think Mrazek will be the one in net.

I wish I was wrong, I dont want to be right about this. A 2nd and a 3rd sounded great. I really thought after his start we had a chance at that.

Good thing they are in. I think its safe to say that a 3rd is all we are getting. I cant see Mrazek starting another game, let alone winning 6 and making a run. Also, I just can't see him being re-signed.

That was the first thing that came to my mind as well.

Is Belfour in?

That's just sad, life can be very s***ty sometimes.

Maybe the goals were weak by today standards, but every player of that era had the same opportunity to score that way, and Messier did it better then most of them. That's all you can ask a guy to do, be one of the best of an era. This is why I find it funny thought when some people try to claim that the 80's/90's were the "greatest era" in hockey. Such revisionist history based on nostalgia. Gretzky and Lemieux were ouliers, the rest were just good players like any other era.

Why would a basement team in Arizona trade for Howard?