this... i don't think the nhl has ever gotten this one right...any thoughts on this subject?
13 replies to this topic
#1
soultrain
-
- Bronze Booster
-
- 805 posts
hairdresser of the sharts
- Location:it smells like a cow ass Cali
#2
Howard He Do It?!
-
- Member
-
- 3,417 posts
Hall-of-Famer
- Location:Hockeytown
Posted 06 May 2010 - 10:44 AM
In my opinion this should be the new rule. Anything goes is dangerous and anything kicked outside of the crease still presents safety problems.And a third one said that as long as a portion of the skate blade is on the ice at all times, that's a good goal as well.
Round 1: Red Wings (4) vs. Coyotes (0)
Round 2: Red Wings (0) vs. Sharks (0)
#3
Drake_Marcus
-
- Member
-
- 8,311 posts
Pariah
- Location:Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Posted 06 May 2010 - 10:46 AM
I like the idea that they would allow kicked goals as long as the part of the skate blade is touching the ice. That seems like a good balance between goalie safety and increased scoring.
- soultrain, MCleveland89, Howard He Do It?! and 1 other like this
Dedicated to lulz once lost:
Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#4
Howard He Do It?!
-
- Member
-
- 3,417 posts
Hall-of-Famer
- Location:Hockeytown
Posted 06 May 2010 - 10:50 AM
And less confusing/enraging reviews.I like the idea that they would allow kicked goals as long as the part of the skate blade is touching the ice. That seems like a good balance between goalie safety and increased scoring.
Round 1: Red Wings (4) vs. Coyotes (0)
Round 2: Red Wings (0) vs. Sharks (0)
#5
soultrain
-
- Bronze Booster
-
- 805 posts
hairdresser of the sharts
- Location:it smells like a cow ass Cali
Posted 06 May 2010 - 11:00 AM
yup...And less confusing/enraging reviews.
something has to change.
#6
MCleveland89
-
- Member
-
- 684 posts
2nd Line Scorer
- Location:Garden City, MI
Posted 06 May 2010 - 11:24 AM
I like the idea that they would allow kicked goals as long as the part of the skate blade is touching the ice. That seems like a good balance between goalie safety and increased scoring.
I couldn't agree with you more. It poses no safety problems, and seems like it should be a legit way to get a goal.
#7
redwngsfan019
-
- Member
- 42 posts
Prospect
- Location:Fredericksburg, Virginia
Posted 06 May 2010 - 11:33 AM
I like the idea that they would allow kicked goals as long as the part of the skate blade is touching the ice. That seems like a good balance between goalie safety and increased scoring.
.
#8
micah
-
- Member
-
- 2,345 posts
Hall-of-Famer
Posted 06 May 2010 - 12:00 PM
I like the idea that they would allow kicked goals as long as the part of the skate blade is touching the ice. That seems like a good balance between goalie safety and increased scoring.
Yes please.
"It was pretty interesting," said Detroit coach Mike Babcock. "We had May in exhibition for a couple of games and no one gets hacked or whacked. When we don't have him, we get run. We don't have a team that twists off helmets at stoppages. You get tired of seeing it all the time. It's just nice when you get someone to look after that stuff."
#9
Buppy
-
- Silver Booster
-
- 1,806 posts
1st Line All-Star
Posted 06 May 2010 - 12:04 PM
With only 5 of the 17 responding GMs believing the issue needs to be discussed, I wouldn't get your hopes up for a change any time soon.
#10
esteef
-
- HoF Booster
-
- 8,576 posts
Legend
Posted 06 May 2010 - 01:03 PM
As soon as Crosby has a kicked goal waved off you'll see the rule changed at lightning speed.
esteef
esteef
"The Wings haven't won a Cup without Darren McCarty since 1955."
#11
Detman
-
- Member
- 21 posts
I AM the DetMan
Posted 06 May 2010 - 02:05 PM
As soon as Crosby has a kicked goal waved off you'll see the rule changed at lightning speed.
esteef
haha too true
#12
hockeynut
-
- Member
- 27 posts
Jr. Prospect
Posted 06 May 2010 - 02:36 PM
Hockey is played with a stick, unless the puck glances ACCIDENTLY off a skate, any redirection that is intentional should not be a goal. It's easy to tell what is on purpose and what is accidental. If you are looking down at the puck and turn your skate as the puck arrives that's not a goal. If you are not looking and the puck hits your skate and goes in, that's accidental. It's not brain surgery.
#13
Grypho
-
- HoF Booster
-
- 487 posts
Sharks Fan
- Location:Saigon, Vietnam
Posted 06 May 2010 - 02:46 PM
They should be able to redirect pucks with their faces if they choose -- unless, of course, there's a distinct nodding motion toward the net.
#14
po-GoWings
-
- Member
-
- 794 posts
6:00ATOI Antagonizer
- Location:Woodhaven, MI, USA
Posted 06 May 2010 - 02:48 PM
i like it as it is
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best Songs That Pump You Up at the Rink |
General Discussion | The Axe |
|
|
|
The Hottest Red Wing
|
Between Periods | Guest_lidstrom#5 (Guest) |
|
|
|
Coyotes file for Bankruptcy/City pays 25mil to keep them
Atlanta on the move |
General Discussion | MacK_Attack |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
