Jasper84

I wonder if 2016-2017 Sheahan would have scored either of those. Feel bad for the kid, but it happens. Bert for the game winner.

So you're subtly saying that we needed this call in our favor and another 5,000 more of these. You got me, I agree.

Ok, wow. That call is ridiculous and if we were on the other end of this, I'd be furious.

If they over turn this, I'm going to be shocked. That's a good goal to me.

I guess we're going to let them score every ******* shot. Why even use a goaltender at this point? Just bring out an extra skater. I can handle a loss, but wtf is this?

Hell yeah boys!!!

It means crap, we've been on the winning end of the first 2 challenges, so we lose the next 20.

I like this challenge

Oh cool, I'm going to have to pay attention to him then. I didn't have a chance to catch any pre-seasons games and have seen lots of Frk talk.

What's the hype around Frk lately? Didn't he get waived by us and the Canes just last season? What am I missing? Also, Nyquist lift it!!!!!!!!!!!!

Weird that there was no mention of goaltender interference before the review. I'll take it of course and he did make contact, so it's not a gift.

oops. that puck was in the net. Edit: Damn, they are checking for it.

Glad to see our 8 legged friends making an early appearance at the LCA!

So much for waiting months to watch a hockey game. 2017 and they're still incapable of broadcasting a pre-season game. And then what is up with this black out nonsense? Why does Boston have to block out the game outside of their area, what am I missing?

Is Boston's stream on their website blacked out to those of us in Detroit? It's completely black for me, just don't know if my browser is being buggy or if we're blacked out.

I know that right now I am wishing that his name didn't have that extra n.

Real question here, as I see Kenny getting lots of s*** about this pick. I'm truthfully not familiar with how an organization comes to decide on a pick and my guess is most here don't either, but for anyone that does: Is it actually Holland responsible for deciding on the pick? I'm sure he can veto it of course, but I would imagine that the scouts are the ones responsible more so than Holland. Not trolling, looking to be educated.

Are you sure Rasmussen will get to play in the NHL before Larkin/AA/Mantha retire?

Don't know anything about this guy, but haven't seen anyone on these boards say anything about him this evening as well. I imagine we're not supposed to be happy?

I hope I'm wrong, but I have this feeling that Holland is about to trade back.

I don't really know much about this draft class. What are a few people we're hoping to pick that are left?

Right?? Easy #1 if that was the case.

I'm not surprised that he's coming back. I've always been 50/50 on whether Stevie would return and still am (I can see him sticking to 1 team as a GM, just like he did as a player), but I just can't help but think (and hope) that maybe their letting Holland finish off his contract and then attempt to bring Stevie in. Their contracts expire at the same time and it doesn't make sense to bring another GM in only for a year, or bring another GM in now for several years and pass up the opportunity on Stevie. I'm basing this off of nothing, just a thought.

My wife just shared this video with me, surprised that it hasn't been posted here yet.

The most you can drop is 3 spots. So the worst pick the Wings can end up with in this draft is 10th overall.