ChristopherReevesLegs

Are you actually gonna address any of my points? All you're doing is dodging In the very same post you say Larkin's contract is not team friendly and that Z is done. Now you say it is team friendly and that Z is done. Flip-flopper.

lol "talk over" NINE minutes later.... No, it's literally not my opinion. Those really are two different salaries. And the "team-friendlyness" of player A's contract is not dependent on what player B's contract is. Zetterberg's move to LTIR does not make Ericsson or Abdelkader contracts anymore palatable, why would it Larkin's? You're tripping over your own feet

Again, this assumes you think both Larkin and Holland are absolute morons. Keep pretending term does not matter. Those salaries are not the same no matter how you slice it. "They know Z is done which is why Larkin got the team-friendly deal, but $6.1 is not team-friendly" Whether or not Larkin's contract is team-friendly or not is not at all tied to Zetterberg's status on the team. Just like Abdelkader's contract did not become more team-friendly when we traded off tatar, or Ericsson's when we traded off Smith.

No you haven't

lol @ him acting pissy and deleting comments. From what I saw yesterday on this video there were comments calling him out, but he hadn't responded. This is maybe the 6th or 7th video I've watched of his. It's one thing to make errors, but you gotta be humble about it hockeyguy. A lot of really big youtubers used to make terrible content, but honed their craft over the years and got big. Hopefully he can learn. If anyone wants to blow up on youtube... make a "content cop" video highlighting all of Hockeyguys inconsistencies/errors. It would get big quick in the hockey community right now. I'll personally push it on the webs for you. Just a fan who does videos. He's been grinding making videos this summer, and has blown up a bit on youtube. Will be interesting to see if he stays relevant when the season starts.

No, it's literally not. Different terms matter a lot. In one scenario his yearly take home is (over the course of the contract) 5 million, and in the other it's 6. Would you rather make $6 million every year or $5 million? Would you rather get paid your entire years salary for 1 hour of work, or your entire one years salary over the course of 10 years? Term matters. A lot. In unrelated news I'd love to be your banker, or possibly sell you a car. PM me for financing. You've completely flip-flopped and moved the goal posts already. Just stop. First you say Larkin is not team friendly and would've taken 1M less, now you're saying he already did take 1M less and is team-friendly. Get your story straight. I'll also point out, from Dylan's Larkin's contract thread earlier this month:

I caught that too, and people called him out on it in the comments. Otherwise the video was decent. He's a Vancouver guy who tries to report on the whole league. His Red Wings depth chart was a lil wonky too. I'm just happy the guy is making hockey content... wish more would.

Wot in contract negotiation are you talkin' bout?? First things first, this is 100% pulled out of your ass. There is no evidence to support any of that. You've conjured this all up in your imagination. That being said, you really think Larkin was willing to take less, but Holland just said "eh f*** it, Zbergs done, here's another 1M kid"? Holland would have to be the moron of the century, like can't even manage an Arby's level dumb, because there is no industry where that is good business. Players and GMs do not negotiate contracts based on what a 3rd party's health/employment status is. That would be ridiculous. I have 3 employees that work directly for me. I am sacking one of them in October. No, the other two will not get raises because of that. Secondly, Larkin was willingly just going to give up $5 million dollars because Zberg might play another year? Why? I could give you some ground to stand on if this team was on the verge of a cup, but as you mentioned yourself, there's a good chance were bottom 5. Larkin and his agent would have to be complete meat-head level morons as well. Hell, even AA handcuffed the team last year, and the team capitulated and traded Sheahan to accommodate him. Larkin commands, and rightly so, much more of a right/ability to do that than AA does. And that leads me again to, why does this tall-tale of yours apply only to Larkin? Why didn't AA just take 1M less? Why didn't Mantha just take 1M less? Not only is your story a complete fabrication, it's not even a plausible one all the way around.

Hockeyguy does Hasek

Vegas caused Ottawa's downfall

Here. They moved it to Cass Ave.

Rumor: Panarin wants to join the Rangers Goes on to say the Rags will not trade for him, but will definitely pursue him during FA next summer.

Never trust the fakenews media

What about Athanasiou and Mantha? Their contracts aren't team friendly either. Vanek too. Why do you single-out Larkin?

I'd gladly waive Frk and Witkowski, and a surprising amount of others on this team as well But you are correct. If Zberg plays the team will have to explore trade options. Custance says he's already heard that from 1 Red Wings source.

I lied, Canada rules

Pengins?

The number of embellishment (diving) calls on each team since the 2010-11 season This website is source Montreal: 23 Pittsburgh: 22 Nashville: 20 Boston: 19 Arizona: 17 Carolina: 17 Edmonton: 17 Tampa Bay: 17 Calgary: 14 New Jersey: 13 Philadelphia: 13 Minnesota: 13 Florida: 13 Anaheim: 12 Dallas: 12 Detroit: 12 St. Louis: 12 Vancouver: 12 Washington: 12 Ottawa: 11 New York Islanders: 10 Chicago: 10 Toronto: 9 San Jose: 9 New York Rangers: 9 Winnipeg: 8 Los Angeles: 7 Colorado: 7 Buffalo: 6 Columbus: 6 Vegas: 1 Red Wings culprits: Abdelkader: 3 Athanasiou: 2 Vanek: 1 Smith: 1 Nyquist: 1 Green: 1 Lashoff: 1 Helm: 1 Hudler: 1 EDIT: I believe Nyquist and Pulkinnen were also fined for diving once each, but there was no call on the ice in those incidents so those didn't land on my list.

You can really tell which one of them lives in Ohio Hockey Twitter in the summer in a nutshell:

How else will I run my diesel powered mobility scooter?