Dabura 12,232 Report post Posted August 14, 2008 (edited) Talking about twisting words -- you're adding "to win" to my statements, which changes their meaning considerably. Take away "to win," and you've got your arguments in a nutshell, which I'll list again: - The Wings are soft - People "around the league" say the Wings are soft - Fighting is essential - The Wings need to fight more - The Wings need to get tougher - The Wings need to send more messages - If the Wings don't do more of the above, they'll get run at, and it could totally be lights-out Now, if what you're saying right now is that you disagree with these statements, then congratulations: you disagree with yourself. Edited August 14, 2008 by Dabura Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,804 Report post Posted August 14, 2008 (edited) Talking about twisting words -- you're adding "to win" to my statements, which changes their meaning considerably. Take away "to win," and you've got your arguments in a nutshell, which I'll list again: - The Wings are soft - People "around the league" say the Wings are soft - Fighting is essential - The Wings need to fight more - The Wings need to get tougher - The Wings need to send more messages - If the Wings don't do more of the above, they'll get run at, and it totally be lights-out Now, if what you're saying right now is that you disagree with these statements, then congratulations: you disagree with yourself. What does the "totally be lights-out" reference allude to? If it alludes to us not winning, you misquoted me. If not, explain, because I don't remember using such a phrase. You have to be careful in attributing phrases like that. Everything else is pretty much right on. Edited August 14, 2008 by GMRwings1983 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dabura 12,232 Report post Posted August 14, 2008 Everything else is pretty much right on. Yes, I know -- that's why I wrote it. So, after a pointless detour, we're back to where we were before: defend these arguments without coming off like a ****, or spare us all the pain of having to read these arguments every time someone makes a thread that's even just slightly related to the topics of grit, toughness, enforcers, etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,804 Report post Posted August 14, 2008 (edited) Yes, I know -- that's why I wrote it. So, after a pointless detour, we're back to where we were before: defend these arguments without coming off like a ****, or spare us all the pain of having to read these arguments every time someone makes a thread that's even just slightly related to the topics of grit, toughness, enforcers, etc. Forget it, Dabura. I'm done defending those arguments. I'm not going through all that again. If you don't like what I've written so far, then too bad. I'm not expecting to convince someone as stubborn and as arrogant as you. You keep contradicting yourself and making feeble attempts at trying to insult me at every turn. At this point, anything I write is going to result in you acting like a complete *******. You've obviously taken this too personally. Neither of us thinks the other has anything constructive as an argument, so why bother? Edited August 14, 2008 by GMRwings1983 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dump-N-Thump Report post Posted August 14, 2008 PMFGZ WERE NOT TUFF ENUFF@@@@ WERE NUT TUFF NUFF@@@@@@ kk, i got 5 threads out of you guys last time, HOW ABOUT ANOTHER 5!!! argue more!! WE NUT TUFF NFUF#### WE NEED A FYTER@@@ U AINT FYTE UNLSS U WIN@@@ U AINTA WUN UNLESS IU FYTE@@@@ 11!!ON1!!!ONE!!!11!1ENo!RE!!ONEEOn!!!E!111 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heaton 1 Report post Posted August 14, 2008 Aaron Downey re-signed, so I can assume we're done here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
