Happy Pancake 6 Report post Posted April 30, 2007 I saw this question mentioned in an article on ESPN.com and it has been something that has always bothered me. Honestly I don't really see the big deal if a player kicks the puck into the net if that's the only way he move the puck forward. To me it doesn't seem like the goalie is put in an unfair position by having the puck guided past him like that. What do you guys think? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted April 30, 2007 No. It's never a good idea to have guys with razor-sharp blades strapped to their feet kicking at things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
betterREDthandead 58 Report post Posted April 30, 2007 What harold said. Also, the more players have to use their stick to play the puck, the less opportunity they have to use them as a weapon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BuckeyeWingsfan80 209 Report post Posted May 1, 2007 absolutely not.... This isn't soccer....use your stick as it was intended.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wings_Fan_In_Exile 3 Report post Posted May 1, 2007 While the lenthy "contreversial" reviews of goals can be a pain, it's better than razor blades flying around the goal crease more than they need to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
twins1729 0 Report post Posted May 6, 2007 I say no, it's an unfair goal, hockey isn't soccer, a goal should be scored with a stick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingsfan40 0 Report post Posted May 20, 2007 I think Yes...but no questionable calls...it would have to be pretty blatant to be disallowed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingfanatic4alltime 32 Report post Posted May 25, 2007 No the rule could use a bit of a tweaking though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
