Broken 16 381 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 I agree that the fight had significance in the game, but you picked the worst point to go off on to prove him wrong. Coming from you that means... well, nothing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline Report post Posted May 14, 2009 (edited) Coming from you that means... well, nothing. Well, neither Shoreline nor Doc are out making topics seeking approval for a rather subjective debate. At very least, your insecurity makes you fail big time. Edited May 14, 2009 by Shoreline Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NHLrules? 32 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 I think this can all be fixed if we have our big D men headhunt near our crease. Getslaughs goal would not have gone in if Ericson Teed off on him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Broken 16 381 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 Oh noes. Polls said for years that people believed Saddam was responsible for 9/11. Indeed, polls speak.. about nothing. By all means, make another topic about insecurity. Edit: Btw, why do people keep responding to the Duck trolls? Oh, that's right. Everyone else is wrong and you are right. What was I thinking? Btw... are you really comparing March 26th to 911? Wow... you're reaching. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holiday 0 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 Coming from you that means... well, nothing. And was this attack necessary? Perhaps you don't wish to discuss hockey and would rather plug your ears and yell "lalalala" when someone disagrees with you. The significance was positive for the Wings, not so much negative for the Avalanche. I think Roy's play didn't really fall off as a direct result of that fight, considering the Wings didn't make their comeback until the third period. Can you provide a disagreement and act like an adult, or are you going to insult me and pretend my opinion is insignificant to the discussions a second time? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thedisappearer 291 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 Removing the 2 (by each team) fighting majors, the Ducks took another 22 minutes in penalties after the game, and they missed giving Niedermeyer something for that elbow. Classy, Ducks. And classy NHL. "Penalize" in such a way as to not penalize them, but instead allow them to feel their style of play is accepted and condoned in the league. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline Report post Posted May 14, 2009 Oh, that's right. Everyone else is wrong and you are right. What was I thinking? Btw... are you really comparing March 26th to 911? Wow... you're reaching. Oh, I thought you were talking about polls and their reliability of what.. something factual? Perhaps logic is well over your head. If you weren't too busy trying to be a dick (and trust me you try way too hard) you might have actually been able go get that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thedisappearer 291 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 These Ducks trolls are pure WIN due to their pure FAIL. I wish other team's fans could act as polite, educated, and rational as DuckGuy. There are other "wrong team" fans () here who I am forgetting, but DG is the example for Anaheim fans. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Broken 16 381 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 Well, neither Shoreline nor Doc are out making topics seeking approval for a rather subjective debate. At very least, your insecurity makes you fail big time. It's got nothing to do with insecurity brainiac. As a matter of fact, it goes hand in hand with the main topic of the boards today. I realize that it's easy for you to meander off the the path a little in order to appear correct, but the Ducks attacked the Wings physically last night. With no suspensions handed out, there is no reason to think it won't happen again. By the way... ever notice that people that bring up other people supposed insecurity issues usually have the deepest ones? Weird how that works. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline Report post Posted May 14, 2009 It's got nothing to do with insecurity brainiac. As a matter of fact, it goes hand in hand with the main topic of the boards today. I realize that it's easy for you to meander off the the path a little in order to appear correct, but the Ducks attacked the Wings physically last night. With no suspensions handed out, there is no reason to think it won't happen again. Ironic that you'd talk about meandering. You must not read your own posts. No suspensions have happened in similar occurrences in other series' these playoffs. And the Ducks being the Ducks is nothing new. Big whoop. If anything this hopefully lights a fire under the boys' asses and score some bloody goals. By the way... ever notice that people that bring up other people supposed insecurity issues usually have the deepest ones? Weird how that works. I'd love for you to cite how. There's more than enough logic to back the notion that one seeking approval for a subjective opinion is insecure about their own views. Unless your belief is that a popular opinion must be correct, and you're walking into a dead end there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GordieSid&Ted Report post Posted May 14, 2009 I will stop trolling as soon as the ducks boards clear all the wings trolls. It is 2009 and you are on an internet forum, get used to it. Ah, so you admit you are trolling and essentially you will stay here to troll until your people can get your own house cleaned up. So basically you are just here to start a bunch of s***. See you ****** bag. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holiday 0 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 It's got nothing to do with insecurity brainiac. As a matter of fact, it goes hand in hand with the main topic of the boards today. I realize that it's easy for you to meander off the the path a little in order to appear correct, but the Ducks attacked the Wings physically last night. With no suspensions handed out, there is no reason to think it won't happen again. By the way... ever notice that people that bring up other people supposed insecurity issues usually have the deepest ones? Weird how that works. If the Wings win game 7, who cares what the Ducks do at the end of the game? Detroit has won three games against a team that has been "physically attacking" them, and could have ended this series earlier if not for a referee and a man named Hiller. What does last night's brawl have to do with this series? There was a brawl after game 3, and the Wings went on to dominate the next two games, breaking Getzlaf's point streak and putting their team in a 3-2 lead in the series. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HadThomasVokounOnFortSt 878 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 I love how people are saying that were scared of the next game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holiday 0 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 I love how people are saying that were scared of the next game. As a fan I'm scared s***less. The Wings were in a position to end the series and make a serious contention for the Stanley Cup Finals (it is the Hawks after all). Now they have to face a Ducks team with a huge amount of momentum in a home game where they HAVE to close the series. Considering Detroit has ended the last 8 series on the road, that scares me a lot. As someone who tries to be reasonable, it is a good chance for the Wings. As a fan, I'm terrified. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GordieSid&Ted Report post Posted May 14, 2009 Oh, and by the way people...don't bother going to the Ducks message board. Nothing new has been added in the past 20 hours. Apparently our resident duck troll and the 9 other hockey fans in California are out surfing or something. Seriously, what a desolate, pathetic message board. It's like a graveyard. Big props to our own Inultus, for without him, that board wouldn't have a thread more than 1 page long. Keep up the good work their Ducky fans. All 10 of you that is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Broken 16 381 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 And was this attack necessary? Perhaps you don't wish to discuss hockey and would rather plug your ears and yell "lalalala" when someone disagrees with you. The significance was positive for the Wings, not so much negative for the Avalanche. I think Roy's play didn't really fall off as a direct result of that fight, considering the Wings didn't make their comeback until the third period. Can you provide a disagreement and act like an adult, or are you going to insult me and pretend my opinion is insignificant to the discussions a second time? I really don't see a need to provide a disagreement. History shows exactly what happened. Endless player interviews have shown exactly what impact those events had on the team. The bottom line is that the Wings need to respond to what took place last night. Period. Now, maybe that means lighting them up for 8 goals. Maybe that means sending a physical message early. Tell ya one thing, if the Wings are going to make them 'pay' by scoring a bunch of goals on them and putting the game out of reach. The Ducks are gonna start running them. Hard. You think the Wings are prepared to overcome that? Based on what I saw last night, I'm not so sure. By the way, the only opinion of yours I disregarded was the opinion that I picked a wrong topic to disagree with Shoreline on. What's it to you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline Report post Posted May 14, 2009 (edited) Oh, and by the way people...don't bother going to the Ducks message board. Nothing new has been added in the past 20 hours. Apparently our resident duck troll and the 9 other hockey fans in California are out surfing or something. Seriously, what a desolate, pathetic message board. It's like a graveyard. Big props to our own Inultus, for without him, that board wouldn't have a thread more than 1 page long. Keep up the good work their Ducky fans. All 10 of you that is. Southern California. Our water (in Northern Cal) isn't very surf friendly, and a body suit doesn't look cool. Edited May 14, 2009 by Shoreline Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holiday 0 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 I really don't see a need to provide a disagreement. History shows exactly what happened. Endless player interviews have shown exactly what impact those events had on the team. The bottom line is that the Wings need to respond to what took place last night. Period. Now, maybe that means lighting them up for 8 goals. Maybe that means sending a physical message early. Tell ya one thing, if the Wings are going to make them 'pay' by scoring a bunch of goals on them and putting the game out of reach. The Ducks are gonna start running them. Hard. You think the Wings are prepared to overcome that? Based on what I saw last night, I'm not so sure. By the way, the only opinion of yours I disregarded was the opinion that I picked a wrong topic to disagree with Shoreline on. What's it to you? It wasn't the topic, it was the "evidence." I think Roy's performance was the furthest thing you could have used to prove the brawl had significance in the game. And then you said that my opinion was meaningless. Unnecessary attack for a very miniscule disagreement. And I'm going to take offense when you attack my character when I didn't even attack you in the least. Also, the Wings know how to handle a team trying to "goon" them into submission. Remember game 5 of the 07 playoffs against Calgary? And the post-game fighting in game 3 this year? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GordieSid&Ted Report post Posted May 14, 2009 Southern California. Our water (in Northern Cal) isn't very surf friendly, and a body suit doesn't look cool. My apologies Shoreline. I should have stated SoCal. By the way, I was just out there (Hermosa beach) to visit my sister. That water is f-ing cold! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doggy 130 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 (edited) @Broken 16, Doc Holiday, etc. Lol. Come on guys. I don't wanna sound like a ****** but a thread was made for this specific topic and you're still discussing it here? Edited May 14, 2009 by Doggy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holiday 0 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 @Broken 16, Doc Holiday, etc. Lol. Come on guys. I don't wanna sound like a ****** but a thread was made for this specific topic and you're still discussing it here? I'm not even discussing that specific topic here. (Am I?) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redwashington2000 42 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 Niderf***er f*** you f*** your ******* brother and all the ducks organization Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline Report post Posted May 14, 2009 My apologies Shoreline. I should have stated SoCal. By the way, I was just out there (Hermosa beach) to visit my sister. That water is f-ing cold! The water in Socal is actually pretty warm. In fact, the warm water and decent beach sand is the only reason to go to Socal.. which I'm sure Socal'ers are tired of me saying. Here you either are nuts and have ice-like veins, or you catch hypothermia unless you're in a body suit. But yeah I've met pretty much ZERO intelligent Duck fans, and the Raider fans got their asshattery from when the team was down in Los Angeles. Something about Socal turns fans into idiots. Except the Wings fans, of course. (<- before Jacqui and miller beat me up) Being up in Norcal you'd appreciate how smart Sharks fans are about hockey, and how un-rowdy their fans tend to be. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline Report post Posted May 14, 2009 @Broken 16, Doc Holiday, etc. Lol. Come on guys. I don't wanna sound like a ****** but a thread was made for this specific topic and you're still discussing it here? The reason Broken 16 made the topic was because of his insecurity in this topic. Just to clarify. Pretty much every thread goes OT so I'm kinda getting used to it now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holiday 0 Report post Posted May 14, 2009 The reason Broken 16 made the topic was because of his insecurity in this topic. Just to clarify. Pretty much every thread goes OT so I'm kinda getting used to it now. Double OT on many occassions actually. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
