4chan humour all over this placeTHAT does NOT make sense...
Pierre McGuire at his best.
#21
Posted 29 December 2010 - 02:54 PM
#22
Posted 29 December 2010 - 02:56 PM
#23
Posted 29 December 2010 - 03:00 PM
South Park humor.4chan humour all over this place
Titanium, you must be near the same age as me because you get all my references, which is helpful for me
HankthaTank - Squirrels, they hate to be thrown. / Why is the magical unicorn named Brian... Jedi - I just downloaded the "kids" book, "Go the F--k to Sleep" as narrated by Samuel L. Jackson on my kindle. I am now ready to be a daddy. / *Checks Router* No, I'm positive I didn't hit the "Wings Defense Sucks" button. Electrophile - I'm just glad the Wings were able to win despite the Curse of Brian. ACallToArms - I think Trey needs to put something about payroll tax and deferred income in his sig... Edicius - I'd rather [have] a soundbite of me saying "I like (man sausage)" rather than "I like Crosby".
#24
Posted 29 December 2010 - 03:02 PM
He is so strange. Reminds me of the time he insisted the wind helped Datsyuk split the Hawks D.
The wind only works on Datsyuk. Proven facts, here.
Just cause you look like the gimp don't mean you play like the gimp!
#25
Posted 29 December 2010 - 03:03 PM
Titanium, you must be near the same age as me because you get all my references, which is helpful for me
Or it's because I'm a big South Park fan and pretty much know every episode except for seasons 2 and 3 because they just plain sucked.
I completely whiffed on your Star Wars tarp reference apparently.
#26
Posted 29 December 2010 - 03:25 PM
why would a hit be unnecessary, there is always a reason for a hit, it is an integral part of the sport, it provides intimidation, wearing down of the opponent, taking them out of the play/off the puck, this one would fall under all 3 so yes t was necessaryInstead of getting into a bitchfest about what constitutes dirty and the good ole "back in the day" argument, can you agree the hit was unneeded?
- Z Winged Dangler and sleepwalker like this
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter
#27
Posted 29 December 2010 - 03:34 PM
Instead of getting into a bitchfest about what constitutes dirty and the good ole "back in the day" argument, can you agree the hit was unneeded?
nope, can't agree. the kid that got wheeled off learned a valuable lesson...keep your head up and don't admire your pass up the middle of the ice. good finish by kassian. good CLEAN hit.
Wings need some Ryan Pulock in the 1st round, a goal scorer in the 2nd round and rounds 3-7 all guys 6'4 or bigger. Please sign Dekeyser to play with Smith. <--Dekeyser signed, Paired next year. Mark your calendars.
Tootoo needs a partner in crime that plays like him on the other side of Helm. Oh hey, we have Mitchell Callahan. Problem solved.
Cleary....
XBox Live BleedRedWing
#28
Posted 29 December 2010 - 06:27 PM

Can't listen live? Check out MoreLikeRadio.com/downloads for show archives!
#29
Posted 29 December 2010 - 06:54 PM
That's straight from the IIHF rule book. You can complain that you don't like the rules that the IIHF enforces, but you can't say that check was 'clean' (within the rules).
There was clearly contact to the head (penalty) and there was a injury on the play (match penalty). You can complain about the supplementary discipline that it was a bit much (the extra game), but you CAN'T SAY THAT WAS A CLEAN CHECK BY IIHF RULES (the only rule set that applies at the WJC).
If you can't grasp that, then you must be a Canadian homer, or just can't read and interpret well.
HankthaTank - Squirrels, they hate to be thrown. / Why is the magical unicorn named Brian... Jedi - I just downloaded the "kids" book, "Go the F--k to Sleep" as narrated by Samuel L. Jackson on my kindle. I am now ready to be a daddy. / *Checks Router* No, I'm positive I didn't hit the "Wings Defense Sucks" button. Electrophile - I'm just glad the Wings were able to win despite the Curse of Brian. ACallToArms - I think Trey needs to put something about payroll tax and deferred income in his sig... Edicius - I'd rather [have] a soundbite of me saying "I like (man sausage)" rather than "I like Crosby".
#30
Posted 29 December 2010 - 09:10 PM
- megaelixir likes this
#31
Posted 29 December 2010 - 10:52 PM
LaughableCan't stand listening to that idiot. My dog knows more about hockey that he does.
#32
Posted 29 December 2010 - 11:11 PM
And agree with most here. Dirty hit. Guy was way to vulnerable, they need to learn to respect others. Goal of the game is to win, not get the biggest hit or to injure someone.
#33
Posted 30 December 2010 - 12:18 AM
#34
Posted 30 December 2010 - 02:33 AM
clean hit, shouldn't be a penalty, but pierre is wrong, there was a bit of head contact, but a totally clean hit, i dk why you would ever suspend something like that
It was pretty late... and a big factor was how wrecked the other guy was. That hit is hard for me to judge... if it wasn't so late I wouldn't have as much of a problem with it. His head was down and it didn't look like Kassian tries to put his elbow or shoulder up extra high to his the head. But damn man, the puck was loooonnnggg gone by the time he hit him.
Without the late factor it's a dangerous but legal NHL hit. One of those "keep your head up" checks.
Getting rid of having to carry people off the ice while praying they aren't paralysed... I think we can live without that in the NHL. I love huge hits as much as the next guy. Players are getting bigger and stronger but brains aren't getting any more durable. And just like an NHL player, I'm a huge fan of being able to walk and chew my own food.
(read: he's one of the most knowledgeable personalities in the game.)
Is he really? Or does he just print out a sheet before each game with the name, draft status, Jr. hockey team and home town (with population!) for each player?
Subtract the parts of his commentary where he's reading s*** off wikipedia and you've got a whole lot less 'hockey analysis'.
- thegerkin, crotty99 and megaelixir like this

Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#35
Posted 30 December 2010 - 09:27 AM
Is he really? Or does he just print out a sheet before each game with the name, draft status, Jr. hockey team and home town (with population!) for each player?
Subtract the parts of his commentary where he's reading s*** off wikipedia and you've got a whole lot less 'hockey analysis'.
but he pronounces french names all frenchy..
- thegerkin likes this
#36
Posted 30 December 2010 - 10:18 AM
It's very close even on a replay, can't blame Pierre all he has is the real time viewing and his little TV between the benches. And it's not like he's ridiculously biased, he called one of Schenn's plays a dive and also a different penalty against the Czech's "a real chintzy call". Sometimes people just see what they want to see
![]()
Just like Pierre!
LaughableI know there's a lot of hate for Pierre but at least make it logical. (read: he's one of the most knowledgeable personalities in the game.)
The Wind only favors Datsyuk!
#37
Posted 30 December 2010 - 12:19 PM
read my quote on the last page:Rule 540 - Checking to the Head and Neck Area – A player who directs a check or blow, with any part of his body, to the head and neck area of an opposing player or “drives” or “forces” the head of an opposing player into the protective glass or boards, shall be assessed at the discretion of the Referee, a minor and a misconduct penalty; a major and game misconduct penalty; or a match penalty. When injury occurs, a match penalty must be assessed.
That's straight from the IIHF rule book. You can complain that you don't like the rules that the IIHF enforces, but you can't say that check was 'clean' (within the rules).
There was clearly contact to the head (penalty) and there was a injury on the play (match penalty). You can complain about the supplementary discipline that it was a bit much (the extra game), but you CAN'T SAY THAT WAS A CLEAN CHECK BY IIHF RULES (the only rule set that applies at the WJC).
If you can't grasp that, then you must be a Canadian homer, or just can't read and interpret well.
im saying the IIHF rules are wrong, not that it was a bad call
It wasn't dirty by IIHF rules because this rule doesn't constitute what is dirty or not, but what is legal or not.
when has stuff like this occurred? Congratulations of coming up with hyperbolic situations. IT wasn't late either so you in head timing must be a few clicks off. It doesn't matter how far the puck is, you could have the puck be a foot form you and get checked late and have it all the way down the ice and be checked in due time. The best solution is to have all players skate with their heads up, not make more and more rules and over regulate the sport. If the idiotic matt stajans cant follow the rules then let them get their bells rung.It was pretty late... and a big factor was how wrecked the other guy was. That hit is hard for me to judge... if it wasn't so late I wouldn't have as much of a problem with it. His head was down and it didn't look like Kassian tries to put his elbow or shoulder up extra high to his the head. But damn man, the puck was loooonnnggg gone by the time he hit him.
Without the late factor it's a dangerous but legal NHL hit. One of those "keep your head up" checks.
Getting rid of having to carry people off the ice while praying they aren't paralysed... I think we can live without that in the NHL. I love huge hits as much as the next guy. Players are getting bigger and stronger but brains aren't getting any more durable. And just like an NHL player, I'm a huge fan of being able to walk and chew my own food.
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This or That
A game |
Water Cooler | SouthernWingsFan |
|
|
|
Best Songs That Pump You Up at the Rink |
General Discussion | The Axe |
|
|
|
Dekeyser on his way to Grand Rapids
|
General Discussion | RedWingCraig |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














