Jump to content


WorkingOvertime's Photo

WorkingOvertime

Member Since 13 May 2009
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 01:13 PM
-----

#2204626 Should Homer Still Be On the Top Line?

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 20 August 2011 - 05:02 PM

That third line is beyond brutal.

Also I believe Helm will be the 3rd line center over Abby, assuming Flip is in the top 6 on the wing.. Helm is faster, better defensively, better offensively, and is a better playmaker than Abby.

Abby has a higher offensive ceiling than Helm IMO. Also, Helm will likely be better with Eaves and Mursak than Abby.


#2204609 Should Homer Still Be On the Top Line?

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 20 August 2011 - 01:29 PM

He should be on the first line, but not because he's a first line player. In order for Homer to be effective, he has to player with linemates who will handle to puck most of the time. Dats and Flip/Z can do that. Also, Data has said that he likes playing with Homer because he opens the ice.

Homer on the fourth line wouldn't work because he isn't fast enough or good enough defensively. He should play first line because that's where he makes a positive impact.

I see Homer playing first line, but Cleary, Abby, etc. will likely be double shifted in his place a few times a game.


#2204207 Crosby's 2012 Season now in Question

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 17 August 2011 - 11:59 AM

I really hope he never plays again. I don't get any pleasure out of saying that, I just think that certain players hurt the game more than help it. Crosby fits into that because so many little ones look up to him and all he does is play extremely well skill wise and extremely poor ethic/gamesmanship/sportsmanship wise.

I am in the opinion that nothing is more important now than to be a good example to the kids on how to act gracefully in whatever they do.

I am awful sick of dealing with people who think it is okay to act the way Crosby and other superstars act.

Can you cite any specific examples of Crosby acting inappropriately? He certainly doesn't have the best character in the league, but he is far from the worst. Also, considering the hype he's lived with for 10+ years, I think he's adjusted relatively well.


#2202467 Weber Arbitration hearing...

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 04 August 2011 - 09:50 PM

$7.5 mil for one year. He wanted $8.5 mil. If he thinks he is worth that much, he's got a serious problem. Think you're God's gift to hockey, fella? Well, you just proved that God has a good sense of humor.

In arbitration the player usually requests above his value and the team usually requests below the player's value. If Weber's wish is offensive, the Preds number was worse IMO.


#2202163 Personal Dilemma

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 03 August 2011 - 10:55 AM

My advice is that you look at Hockeystreams or Myp2p.eu for streaming. I think Hockeystreams is worth it at $90 a year plus all the extras you get and how easy it is. At the same time though, I am going to try Myp2p.eu this year instead of paying. Its not as intuitive, but the streams of Baseball and other sporting events are very nice. I will be interested to see the quality of the hockey games.

I think I touched on this in my other post, but I'll reiterate here. For the first week(s) I suggest trying all/most of the available streams for a game and make a note of the better ones. Most of the streamers do games every day (or multiple games a day), and it's really helpful to have a list of the better streams on hand. Therefore, you rarely have to go through all the available streams to find the highest quality. I think a lot of people who try myp2p just use the first link they see, not knowing the quality varies between streams.

It sounds really simple, but the idea didn't strike me for a while and searching through streams at game-time can be frustrating.


#2201802 Report: Gary Bettman makes $7.5M

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 31 July 2011 - 10:37 AM

Bettman is a ******, but he's doing a fair job.

Agree. I don't think many people like him or agree with many of his decisions, but he has done a good job.


Bettman still has not provided fans with a television deal that does not insult our intelligence.

Would you rather have one game a week on ESPN2, or three games a week on NBC/NBC Sports (Versus)? I don't have cable (so the deal doesn't directly affect me), but I know which one I would choose. One nationally televised game a week would be an insult to our intelligence IMO.

It's certainly cool to hate Bettman, but I would like someone here who doesn't think he deserves $7.5m to argue how Bettman has failed the NHL in increasing revenues, awareness, etc.


#2193616 Jackets sign Wisniewski: 6-years $33-million ($5.5m/yr)

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 01 July 2011 - 11:29 AM

Have fun never competing for the cup Wiz!!

Have you seen what CBJ has done this off-season? They are now a possible playoff team. If they can make similar moves in the coming years, they could make a deep playoff run.


#2192741 Wings re-sign Ericsson to 3-year, $9.75m contract

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 30 June 2011 - 08:36 PM

Was not trading a fourth still a good move?

No.


#2186060 No, No, NO! Jagr interested in Detroit.

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 16 June 2011 - 08:21 AM

my problem is that this puts another one of our young guys out of a regular position again.... might as well resign modano, draper, ozzie. seriously. I mean look at other teams: people are shocked that carter is 26 and puts up mad points or that Burns/Weber are so young and talented. The fact is that they had time from a young age to ripen. Our young guys don't come up till they are usually 24 and they don't get much in terms of minutes. Young talented guys are great for everything: keeping, trading for big return, health/injuries, and energy. Don't say that only top 5 picks can make the jump at an earlier age, weber was a 2nd rounder. I want to have more guys like helm and abby that we can count on for the future, forget these "one year wonders" and invest in our youngsters.

Realistically, he would only take a spot away from Hudler, Emmerton, or Miller. The best option IMO is for Jagr to replace Hudler.


#2185337 Babcock Interview + Jagr to Detroit Rumor

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 15 June 2011 - 10:37 AM

HOW MANY TIMES AM I GOING TO HAVE THE USE THE DO NOT WANT DOG THIS MORNING?!

Really, though, I'm with Stevkrause - he'd be taking a spot away from someone more deserving / more desirable.

Like who? Emmerton? Hudler?

I don't want the Wings to sign Jagr for any amount of large money, but I'd take him for under 2.5 million on a one year deal.


#2184949 SCF: Boston Bruins vs. Vancouver Canucks

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 13 June 2011 - 07:44 PM

I can't believe NBC showed that quote as he was getting pulled. Awesome troll there.


#2184634 Mayfield at number 24

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 11 June 2011 - 08:07 PM

Skilled players play in more offensive roles and top line minutes. Skilled players are more valuable. The same applies to the draft. Rarely it's wise to pick physicality or size etc. over skill in the early rounds. You can dominate with size in the junior leagues if you're more mature physically already. Some players mature earlier, but in the end it's the potential you look for - and skill will become more important in time.

I would agree with you if the Wings had a top-10 pick, but the better skill players all go within the top-10. I'm fine with the Wings picking a shut-down dman in the first round if he is projected to be a good shut-down dman in the NHL. The Wings need players to make it to the NHL and not be fringe players, regardless of role. IMO the Wings are just as likely (or more likely) to find a skilled forward in the other rounds (not round one) than the are at the bottom of the first round. Therefore, picking a shut-down dman is not a wasted pick.

If Biggs is available, I want the Wings to pick him, but he will probably go earlier.

EDIT- All of the skilled players that are near-ready NHLers are taken before the Wings will pick. Any top-line talents will likely have to be a high-risk player, and that should occur in later rounds.


#2183865 SCF: Boston Bruins vs. Vancouver Canucks

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 08 June 2011 - 09:50 PM

Boston just made Van look silly.


#2183817 SCF: Boston Bruins vs. Vancouver Canucks

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 08 June 2011 - 08:39 PM

Boston needs to keep this up.


#2183729 10/11 Hockeyfights.com awards voting...

Posted by WorkingOvertime on 08 June 2011 - 02:29 PM

The Eastern Conference isn't real hockey.


That is all.

Edit:
The reason why I wouldn't want one of those players can be stated in one stat: Detroit - 81.7% PK. Until the Wings fix their PK there is 0 reason to bring a guy who spends 300 minutes in the box. Drew Miller may not be a great offensive talent, but he gives 100% and brings 20 points, he is very disciplined (only 10 PIM in 66 games), and he does it all cheaply. Why anyone would want to bring in a penalty machine to the Wings who are in the bottom half in PK is beyond me.

Most of those PIMS are from fighting or (undeserved IMO) misconducts. Konopka didn't have 300 PIMs composed of minors. Also, that does not address McCormick. Konopka and McCormick are both great PKers as well, so they wouldn't hurt the team in that regard. If anything your statistic favors these players because they can PK well.

I'm not sure why this reply was to my post, unless it was just out of convenience... I've stated since day one that a guy like McCormick is what is needed today and the Wings could use him... I just hate the enforcer debate, because pure enforcers are useless in todays game...

More in response to the posters that haven't been to the website in the OP to looks at the other teams who are nominated for best enforcing team than you specifically. The Pens and Bruins are both in running for this award.