spydrwebb 0 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artic...0339/1128/rss16 "Tomas Kopecky has moved from a wing to a center position, while Kris Draper has gone from center to a wing. "Kopecky is 6-foot-3, and we feel over time he'll become a real good matchup center," Babcock said. "Can he do it? I don't know. You have to have the opportunity, and we'll give him one right off the start." Babcock feels Draper's speed can be best utilized playing a wing on a line with center" Thoughts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Opie 308 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 Not a bad move at all, playing any of the young guys with Draper imho is a great move. Plus if this line is on the ice and there is an important face off to be won, you have a great face off man on the wing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JayUp88 1 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 hey what ever he does is fine with me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
egroen 384 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 As long as Draper keeps taking faceoffs - He was one of the top guys in the NHL last year in faceoff %. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swedishconnection 36 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 If you continue reading the article, it goes on to say Drapes will be on Flips line, not Kopay's. Flip is slick enough to take advantage of Drape's speed, where as Kopay probably is a little too slow (can you say offsides?) to properly utilize Drapes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toby91_ca 620 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 (edited) As long as Draper keeps taking faceoffs - He was one of the top guys in the NHL last year in faceoff %. Well, if he is playing wing, then he won't be taking faceoffs (not many anyway). I didn't read the article and maybe they are suggesting he takes the draws and then moves over the wing position during play, but I can't imagine that would work very well. Edited September 14, 2007 by toby91_ca Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 I wonder how these lines will shake down. If everyone stays healthy, then whose the #13 forward? Holmstrom - Datsyuk - Grigorenko Filpulla - Zettreberg - Hudler Draper - Cleary - Samuelson Drake/Maltby - Kopecky - Franzen Also, why move Draper to the wing unless you're planning on putting him on the top 2 lines? IMO they better not put him on the top two lines. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeverForgetMac25 483 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 I don't mind trying it out, but I can't say it doesn't concern me a little that Drapes won't be taking that many faceoffs. It was comforting to see him take the draw in our own zone when the Wings were clinging to a 1 goal lead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Son of a Wing 1,644 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 Team toughness The transformation into a Mike Babcock team is complete, in many people's estimation. Nobody really talks about whether the Wings are physical, gritty or tough to play against anymore. The Wings were tougher than a physical Calgary team in the first round of the playoffs, and outwilled San Jose in Round 2. In Johan Franzen , Tomas Kopecky , Dan Cleary and Dallas Drake , the Wings have grit and the ability to hit up front. The defense lacks overpowering size, but Niklas Kronwall and Andreas Lilja provide a physical presence. Unlike some people on this board, these guys know the definition of grit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Winged Scooter 0 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 I wonder how these lines will shake down. If everyone stays healthy, then whose the #13 forward? Holmstrom - Datsyuk - Grigorenko Filpulla - Zettreberg - Hudler Draper - Cleary - Samuelson Drake/Maltby - Kopecky - Franzen Also, why move Draper to the wing unless you're planning on putting him on the top 2 lines? IMO they better not put him on the top two lines. I think Grigorenko making the 1st line is quite a stretch ( at least for now ), I like the second line ( even though it's a rather small line..) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JayUp88 1 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 I think Grigorenko making the 1st line is quite a stretch ( at least for now ), I like the second line ( even though it's a rather small line..) agreed, thats pretty big order for his first year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swedishconnection 36 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 (edited) I wonder how these lines will shake down. If everyone stays healthy, then whose the #13 forward? Holmstrom - Datsyuk - Grigorenko Filpulla - Zettreberg - Hudler Draper - Cleary - Samuelson Drake/Maltby - Kopecky - Franzen Also, why move Draper to the wing unless you're planning on putting him on the top 2 lines? IMO they better not put him on the top two lines. Grigs on the first line? I highly doubt it. At least not right away. In the article, Flip and Draper are on the same line. I think that Babs still wants Cleary on the wing, not center. More likely : Homer - Dats - Sammy Huds - Zata - Franz/Grigs? Cleary/Franz? - Flip - Drapes Maltby/Cleary? - Kopay - Drake In any case - I think that is what Babs will most likely try. I personally would switch Franz with Cleary. Wow... we really need to start investing in wingers who can play thier part. This center depth is giving me migranes. Edited September 14, 2007 by swedishconnection Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Opie 308 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 I would much rather have Cleary out there than I would Maltby, at least Cleary can put the biscuit in the basket once in a while. I love how people complain that Sammy isn't a first liner, grigs isn't a first liner, cleary isn't a first liner so on and so on, who else is. Heatley isn't walking through the doors of the Joe anytime soon. Babs has to make do with what he has. Unless some how the wings manage to make a trade for a top 6 forward, this team has three first line guys, and they do not want Z and dats on the same line. These lines will be tweaked all year long until babs finds the lines he likes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kozac 10 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 Does anyone remember the Draper-Fedorov-Yzerman line? That one was pretty good and Draper did fine on the wing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeverForgetMac25 483 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 Does anyone remember the Draper-Fedorov-Yzerman line? That one was pretty good and Draper did fine on the wing. I can give you two reasons why Draper was good on that line. Do you need me to list them? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeverForgetMac25 483 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 Sidenote: That's not a knock on Draper. I think he's invaluable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KrazyGangsta 79 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 (edited) Holmstrom Datsyuk Zetterberg Sammy Filppula Hudler Draper Kopecky Cleary Maltby Franzen Drake Edited September 14, 2007 by KrazyGangsta Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drake_Marcus 890 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 Sidenote: That's not a knock on Draper. I think he's invaluable. Definitely. And to be fair- I think we all know that Drapes will be playing on every PK. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StevieBoy 2 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 My bigger issue is that I fail to understand why each year Babcock wants to split up the Datsuk/Zetts/Holmstrum line. They've provien to be uber productive and when they've been split up they have not been nearly as productive as when together, and they end up together again anyways. Leave that line alone...let them build on what they've done. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theman19 47 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 Well I for one think this is a good idea, Draper has shown he can score despite his hands of stone. In 04 he had the highest goal production of his career and if he plays in an offensive role i can see him doing more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoCryWolfe 0 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 Holmstrom Datsyuk Zetterberg Sammy Filppula Hudler Draper Kopecky Cleary Maltby Franzen Drake That first line won't stay intact. It is pretty much decided (paraphrasing from multiple sources) that Hank and Pavel will be split, each centering the first two lines. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hank 0 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 I don't mind trying it out, but I can't say it doesn't concern me a little that Drapes won't be taking that many faceoffs. It was comforting to see him take the draw in our own zone when the Wings were clinging to a 1 goal lead. I imagine Drapes will still take most of the draws and then resume his position on Wing after. McCarty used to do this all the time too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 Im starting to warm up to these lines changes and the things that Babs is doing. If this ends up working out, itll be a sham if Babs doesnt get some Adams cred. Hes seriously crafting a prototypical hockey team out of a forward corps that is somewhat lacking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Son of a Wing 1,644 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 My bigger issue is that I fail to understand why each year Babcock wants to split up the Datsuk/Zetts/Holmstrum line. They've provien to be uber productive and when they've been split up they have not been nearly as productive as when together, and they end up together again anyways. Leave that line alone...let them build on what they've done. Well Datsyuk and Zetterberg both want to play center badly so I'm sure they are in support of breaking that line up as well. They are both clearly better at center anyways. Im sure you will see that line on the powerplay regardless so no worries. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blood On The Ice 15 Report post Posted September 14, 2007 Well, if he is playing wing, then he won't be taking faceoffs (not many anyway). I didn't read the article and maybe they are suggesting he takes the draws and then moves over the wing position during play, but I can't imagine that would work very well. As a winger he can still take all of the faces off. Darius Zubrus played RW for the CAPS the last several years and was always good for 500 to 600 face offs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites