MacK_Attack 108 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 I would give up Lebda in a Sundin deal no problem. I don't think the Leafs would have much use for him. Lots of "decent" defencemen in the system, they don't need another one at the moment. The Leafs would prefer a top-end forward prospect as the big prize of a Sundin trade, but Detoit really doesn't have one, so I doubt they'd do a deal that did not include Kindl. The Leafs are falling fast, sitting 4th-last in the league and dropping. If you're thinking of getting Mats Sundin for average roster players and mid-level prospects, you're dreaming. Mats has been the heart & soul of the Leafs for almost 15 years, he's their all-time leader in all offensive categories (except assists) he's been the captain for 10 years and he's currently in the top-15 in NHL scoring. Players like that are not given away. His trade return is similar to Forsberg, but I believe it's higher because there's fewer rental options on this year's deadline sellers and Mats does not have the injury concerns that Forsberg did. Also, I don't think Mats would hold the Leafs hostage in terms of where he'd go. Obviously, he'd want to go to a contender, but he isn't the type of guy to restrict it to 2 or 3 teams. He just doesn't operate that way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lou_Siffer 1 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 (edited) ^^ Agreed. Just take what Nashville gave up for Forsberg as a base, and add an additional 1st or good, quality prospect. Edited January 6, 2008 by Lou_Siffer Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stlwing14 0 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 I don't know. As much as I like Sundin and all, the rental price seems to high. But then I'm not the GM. I wouldn't mind throwing early round draft picks knowing how deep we've been able to find quality players before. Just the fact of what Lebda, Hudler, and Howard could do in the future makes it too steep for my blood. What in the world would Toronto fans do with Sundin going to all places, Detroit? Just curious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
up2here 41 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 I don't think the Leafs would have much use for him. Lots of "decent" defencemen in the system, they don't need another one at the moment. The Leafs would prefer a top-end forward prospect as the big prize of a Sundin trade, but Detoit really doesn't have one, so I doubt they'd do a deal that did not include Kindl. The Leafs are falling fast, sitting 4th-last in the league and dropping. If you're thinking of getting Mats Sundin for average roster players and mid-level prospects, you're dreaming. Mats has been the heart & soul of the Leafs for almost 15 years, he's their all-time leader in all offensive categories (except assists) he's been the captain for 10 years and he's currently in the top-15 in NHL scoring. Players like that are not given away. His trade return is similar to Forsberg, but I believe it's higher because there's fewer rental options on this year's deadline sellers and Mats does not have the injury concerns that Forsberg did. Also, I don't think Mats would hold the Leafs hostage in terms of where he'd go. Obviously, he'd want to go to a contender, but he isn't the type of guy to restrict it to 2 or 3 teams. He just doesn't operate that way. I agree 100%. I was just saying Lebda as part of a deal. The other poster mentioned that Lebda was untouchable with I thought was silly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wingswillwincup Report post Posted January 6, 2008 That's a joke, right? If you want Mats Sundin, you're going to have to give up something to get him. why is that a joke ?? emmerton ( top 6 forward) pyett ( got potential ) or meech ( nhl ready , and leafs suck on defence) helm ( good defensive forward ) 1st round pick for a rental player wtf you wanna give howard kindl helm 1st rd pick ?? no team is gonna give up 2 top prospects for a rental player , no team that mats sundin would wanna go to anyways ..... if thats not enough to get mats sundin then the hell with him , not worth giving our top guys for a rental Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wingswillwincup Report post Posted January 6, 2008 Intresting tho id rather give a 1st than hudler ( i just like him) Perfer to risk it with forsberg so we dont give up any assests. yup if forsberg decides he can play then hes #1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MacK_Attack 108 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 yup if forsberg decides he can play then hes #1 Forsberg is done. He's not coming back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wingswillwincup Report post Posted January 6, 2008 Lebda? Are you kidding? He is young and fast and plays hard every night. And who would you replace him with? No. Lebda isn't going anywhere well i put lebda incase we need to give up someone on the roster with any real value that we might be able to part with , they wont want samuelsson ...... id might be able to part with lebda because we got alot of depth on defense in my opinion , with meech,kindl,quincey,ericsson,smith, pyett ........ we can then make a trade for blake or some other physical d man , but obviously id rather keep lebda , and realistically i know he wont go anywhere , im just saying .... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rice 42 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 When I (and 99% of Finns) think of a really annoying hockey player,two come to mind: Forsberg and Sundin. There has to be someone else... :puke: That wouldn't happen to have anything to do with the fact that they're Swedish, would it? I can see where you're coming from with Forsberg, but not at all with Sundin. Seems like a great guy to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MacK_Attack 108 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 why is that a joke ?? emmerton ( top 6 forward) pyett ( got potential ) or meech ( nhl ready , and leafs suck on defence) helm ( good defensive forward ) 1st round pick for a rental player None of those players have 1st line or first pairing potential, which is what the Leafs will get as the centerpiece to the trade. Like I said before, the Leafs probably won't do a deal that doesn't include Kindl. They have to get top value for Sundin because this is the move that sets the tone for the rebuilding phase. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nero 20 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 How about Grigorenko? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wingswillwincup Report post Posted January 6, 2008 None of those players have 1st line or first pairing potential, which is what the Leafs will get as the centerpiece to the trade. Like I said before, the Leafs probably won't do a deal that doesn't include Kindl. They have to get top value for Sundin because this is the move that sets the tone for the rebuilding phase. someone was talkin about what nashville gave up for philly ??? Forsberg, 33, was peddled to the Predators in exchange for forward Scottie Upshall, OHL defenceman Ryan Parent and first- and third-round draft picks. scott upshall ........ i dont even think hes a top 6 forward .... emmerton has top 6 potential and offensive talent ryan parent ...... i dont know how hes doing but i dont think hed be that much better then a meech or pyett , maybe parent would be a 4th defencemen at the highest and 2 picks its that hard to believe emmerton meech helm and a 1st rd pick would be enough ?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MacK_Attack 108 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 someone was talkin about what nashville gave up for philly ??? Forsberg, 33, was peddled to the Predators in exchange for forward Scottie Upshall, OHL defenceman Ryan Parent and first- and third-round draft picks. scott upshall ........ i dont even think hes a top 6 forward .... emmerton has top 6 potential and offensive talent ryan parent ...... i dont know how hes doing but i dont think hed be that much better then a meech or pyett , maybe parent would be a 4th defencemen at the highest and 2 picks its that hard to believe emmerton meech helm and a 1st rd pick would be enough ?? No, Sundin has more value than Forsberg. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rice 42 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 No, Sundin has more value than Forsberg. Yeah, but '08 picks have more value than those '07 picks did. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wingswillwincup Report post Posted January 6, 2008 No, Sundin has more value than Forsberg. we shall see what happens then Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FinRedWing 172 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 That wouldn't happen to have anything to do with the fact that they're Swedish, would it? I can see where you're coming from with Forsberg, but not at all with Sundin. Seems like a great guy to me. Too many clutch goals against us. Resulted into a not-so-nice song about him and the Finnish fans holding "Sundin & Forsberg - Just married" signs. I guess we shall never forget. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wingswillwincup Report post Posted January 6, 2008 Yeah, but '08 picks have more value than those '07 picks did. and as good as sundin started the year hes cooled off ...... and forsberg is forsberg hes won the cup and knows what it takes to win , hes a winner , sundin has won crap playin for that leafs team ....... i dont think sundin is gonna get 2 top prospects another player and 2 picks or whatever it is that guy thinks the leafs will get Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Detroit # 1 Fan 2,204 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 If your comparing Forsbergs return to Sundins, then Mats wont move. Because it would cost much more because, Mats is a better player and is less injury prone. I could see 2 top potential prospects, top 6 and bottom 6 forward, 1st round pick and a low round pick. Possibly more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dicksmack 33 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 Won't happen... The Wings have enough scoring punch as it is. Hopefully Kenny goes for D for depth and in case of injuries. We need to stick with our prospects and stop all this nonsense. The last time we swiped a Leaf didn't work out so well... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lou_Siffer 1 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 someone was talkin about what nashville gave up for philly ??? Forsberg, 33, was peddled to the Predators in exchange for forward Scottie Upshall, OHL defenceman Ryan Parent and first- and third-round draft picks. scott upshall ........ i dont even think hes a top 6 forward .... emmerton has top 6 potential and offensive talent ryan parent ...... i dont know how hes doing but i dont think hed be that much better then a meech or pyett , maybe parent would be a 4th defencemen at the highest and 2 picks its that hard to believe emmerton meech helm and a 1st rd pick would be enough ?? If you actually believe that the trade value of Derek Meech and Cory Emmerton is the equivalent to what Scottie Upshall and Ryan Parent were, i dont really know what to say other than you're way off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest DetroitIan Report post Posted January 6, 2008 I'll be bouncing off the walls if we end up snagging Sundin. That would be the perfect player to go for. Sundin would be perfect in our system. And his physical presence would be a big help as well. God I hope this happens. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wingswillwincup Report post Posted January 6, 2008 If you actually believe that the trade value of Derek Meech and Cory Emmerton is the equivalent to what Scottie Upshall and Ryan Parent were, i dont really know what to say other than you're way off. upshall is 24 yrs old , his highest point total in his career is 24 pts and hes on pace for 27 ....... ya hes so much better then emmerton , thats why holland talks highly about him and hes one of our top ranked prospects ryan parent i dont know much about but then again its basically meech or pyett and helm so its 2 for one Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lou_Siffer 1 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 Kindl Hudler 1st 3rd (with that turning into a 1st if he re-signs) Like it or not, thats reality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FinRedWing 172 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 Kindl Hudler 1st 3rd (with that turning into a 1st if he re-signs) Like it or not, thats reality. And Kenny won't give that much up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
betterREDthandead 58 Report post Posted January 6, 2008 There is not one single can't-miss prospect in the system. I know what potential is there, but up and down the list there is absolutely nobody you can look at and guarantee will be an everyday player in the NHL. Closest we have is Howard, who I expect is good enough to be at least a backup, but you never know. Therefore I expect it will probably take a player off the roster to get Sundin. This Emmerton-Pyett-Helm stuff won't cut it and we can stop pretending it will. As long as we don't give up Flip, I would just drool to have Sundin in the Winged Wheel. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites