Guest mindfly Report post Posted July 1, 2008 http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/07/01/redden_rangers/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redwings1914 18 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 (edited) 6.5 million per year over six years. EDIT--Perhaps this takes them out of Sundin and Hossa, Jagr too. EDIT 2-Clarification Edited July 1, 2008 by redwings1914 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Majsheppard 203 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 They are much improved with him. MUCH improved. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted July 1, 2008 6.5 million over six years. EDIT--Perhaps this takes them out of Sundin and Hossa, Jagr too. That figure is inaccurate. Redden would not sign for $1m/year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest EZBAKETHAGANGSTA Report post Posted July 1, 2008 (edited) AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAH THIS IS WORSE THAN FINGER FOR 3.5!!!!! REDDEN IS ABSOLOUTLY HORRIBLE NOW AND HE WILL NOT HAVE A COMEBACK SEASON.... EVER Watch any tape of Redden the past season if your questioning my sanity. Edited July 1, 2008 by EZBAKETHAGANGSTA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mad dingo 6 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 makes sense. some high quality coke in NYC. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
96warrior 11 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 That figure is inaccurate. Redden would not sign for $1m/year. 6 years/$6.5 million per year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
10 Minute Misconduct 104 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 They are much improved with him. MUCH improved. Have you watched Redden play over the last two years? LOL! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 That figure is inaccurate. Redden would not sign for $1m/year. Could you really not figure it out? I dont see how this takes them out of the running for Hossa, Sundin, or Jagr. I'm pretty sure they have a ton of cap space (and a lot of holes to fill). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 They are much improved with him. MUCH improved. For how much Redden has gone down hill for the past 2 years, it doesnt improve them that much. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reds4Life 51 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 Good Lord. Just WOW.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Four Report post Posted July 1, 2008 Overpaid but rangers need him on defense BADLY Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZigZagYourTorso 8 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 Worst signing of the day. Well money-wise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted July 1, 2008 Could you really not figure it out? I dont see how this takes them out of the running for Hossa, Sundin, or Jagr. I'm pretty sure they have a ton of cap space (and a lot of holes to fill). TSN originally posted it as six years for $6.5m, total; this is what "$6.5m over six years" means. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redwingsfan18 1 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 Have you watched Redden play over the last two years? LOL! I think he was being sarcastic.. at least I hope so Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dump-N-Thump Report post Posted July 1, 2008 i bet stuart is kicking himself in his ass for signing his deal.. knowing he could of cashed in big time.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline Report post Posted July 1, 2008 I mean, it wasn't bad for what the Rangers need. But if it were the Wings, Holland would need to walk to the guillotine. Wings couldn't justify paying a guy who's play has been (and will continue to be) deteriorating. Especially for that term. 6 years is just.. wow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dominator2005 558 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 OVERPAID BIG TIME Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reilly 24 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 Boy, I remember after the lockout, I thought the Rangers finally "got it" when it comes to free agency and were focused on building a team with good drafting and filling in holes. Now they're just spending every summer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 TSN originally posted it as six years for $6.5m, total; this is what "$6.5m over six years" means. Its called inference. No one in their right mind is going to actually assume Redden would sign for a little less than 1.1 per. Unless they're an idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 i bet stuart is kicking himself in his ass for signing his deal.. knowing he could of cashed in big time.. He knew very well he was giving up money to sign with the Wings. They've even told him he'd have to take a paycut to come here. Everyone saw the overpayments coming. It was no surprise. Apparently hes much happier about winning than money. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jawbreaker 0 Report post Posted July 1, 2008 Rags are doing it again! I hope they will add Bertuzzi for 4M, and trade for Lang. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixer 37 Report post Posted July 2, 2008 Rags are doing it again! I hope they will add Bertuzzi for 4M, and trade for Lang. lol, too bad the avs beat them to Raycroft, they would have given him a couple million a year as well Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,804 Report post Posted July 2, 2008 Damn! I was hoping the Wings would get both him and Bouwmeester for $1 million each. Nice going, Kenny. Looks like you screwed another one up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cusimano_brothers 1,655 Report post Posted September 25, 2010 From TSN : The New York Rangers are expected to place veteran defenceman Wade Redden on waivers Saturday, GM Glen Sather confirmed.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
