• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Hockeytown0001

12/27 GDT: Red Wings 3 at Avalanche 4, (SO)

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

That should be *** for tat. Losing your best defenseman can easily be assuaged when your opponent has lost their two best forwards, yet the Avs have 3 goals in the first period alone.

Agree, but still, no effort. How many times have happend through whole this season?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think we need to stop using the term "fair weather." The Wings have been underperforming for several months now, and it looks like energy to bring on the comeback is dwindling by the day.

Yeah, I'd blame someone for skipping town after a week of bad weather, but with nearly 3 months of foreboding, I'm not sure I'd blame people now that the hurricane may be on the horizon.

You can come up with band-aid after band-aid after band-aid, but eventually you just need to make some changes.

That would be true if the Wings were playing half assed and doing nothing but losing. They've been winning, even though it's ugly. Because of the Cup win, the bar is set so high for this team it's ridiculous. They don't just have to win, they have to dominate.

Obviously that's what we want to happen before the playoffs, but to throw a tantrum and stop watching in the first period is still pretty fair weather in my book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline

Another PK coming up. Go figure.

This is just some lazy ******* defense. You can't tell me one shouldn't panic in consistently watching this.

Edited by Shoreline

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please recommend some then. Fire Babcock? Holland? Trade Lid or Z or Dats or Franzen or Kronner or Stuart? Puh-leaze.

The only changes we can make is on the 3rd line defense, and 4th line offense- or line tweaks, which are already happening. That's not as much a "change" as it is a a "subtle difference".

If you want to have an intelligent conversation, I'm up for it. But if you're going to jump immediately in with the hyperbole, then its pointless. Yeah. Trade the entire team for a chance at Hedman and Tavares. Yup. Thats exactly what I said.

And any change is a difference, smart guy. Do you even remember who Lidstrom first passed the cup to after they one? Yeah...just one guy that made a "subtle difference." :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, if we don't kill this penalty AND score a shorthanded goal, I'm burning all my redwings merchandise and becoming a sharks fan, so hockey will be fun again...not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline

No Wing being physical, yet again, with the Avs in the front. No bodies being hit..

.. this caused two PP goals here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline

There we go. FINALLY an Avs penalty. Wings good on the forecheck. 4 on 4 then 1:30+ in PP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now