Axl Foley

Like Steve Rogers before the serum.

You realize I am not rooting against it, right? See I'm not like one of those Zadina haters who actually wanted him to fail so they could be right.

Be honest. The Army wouldn't take you.

what do u think 40 point players will be making in 2025?

they aint pretty boys

Lol. If I was a Republican Boomer I'd still be questioning the 2020 election results. I am not. Because conspiracy theories and fixing accusations usually come from confirmation bias seen thru the lens of suspicion, without any hard evidence. You still havent proven that Weekes "knew" the results before hand. If he predicts the winner of the Stanley Cup beforehand, I dont consider it "rigged" if he's right. Also, if it was rigged, than why on earth would Weekes be in on it? Common sense would say to keep the number of those involved as low as possible. Again, suspicion does not equal fact.

You got me. Stick blades never hurt anyone.

Would anyone take Hughes over Seider in a redraft? I see a lot of talk about Hughes still being the best player in that draft.

I mean...that would be great if it happens. I just don't see it.

He is being paid based on his production. He is not overpaid. I dont see this as a contract that ages badly. Even if his production drops towards the end, the cap hit will still be consistent with what other similar players are making at that time.

What a ridiculous ejection. No wonder the Swiss are always neutral, they are all a bunch of p*****s.

Some actual evidence of fixing, other than subjective suspicion, would be nice. Still haven't seen it.

How is the Larkin contract an "insane mistake"? Based on similar players, that contract, is at worst, market value. It won't be long until 70+ point players make 10 or more.

you need 20 witnesses to verify a draw?

Fabbri is another example. Guys who CAN fill in in the top 6 when need be, but would be better on the 3rd line.