Seth 0 Report post Posted February 9, 2006 thats good gobias why don't you jump in and add fuel to the flame. Perfect. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gobias 0 Report post Posted February 9, 2006 heh, get over yourself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seth 0 Report post Posted February 10, 2006 Thank you for not contiuning to be immature. Im really greatful that we have such developed people here at LGW. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gobias 0 Report post Posted February 10, 2006 (edited) yawn....you done? Should I get a ladder to help bring you down? and by the way "scrub" is an interesting way to describe a player who has put up 30 points or more since 2001. But hey I guess your the hockey guru right? I mean its not as if anybody should challenge your knowledge or your opinion of how this organization could improve itself. Holy Marbles Robin! I think Norris might be a little touchy when someone else has a thought.....shhhh shhhhh But hey I think its cool that as a Mod you go around and post posts with negitivity towards other posters, great way to like not abuse power or be an arse ya know. You want to have an intelligent conversation? Learn this: people are going to disagree with you, especially on the internet. Your trade idea was awful and someone called you on it - big deal. Pissing and moaning and making a scene doesn't help your case at all. Edited February 10, 2006 by gobias Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seth 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2006 Well thats it kids...pack up your bags. This vacation is over, some guy named norrisnick and his lackie have clearly made us on the net. Whatever. I told you to PM me, you contiune. Thats cool I'm not going to waste my time on this anymore. Just know that you have no idea what your talking about, but thats ok. Your entitled to ignorance, sh*t look at our government structure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gobias 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2006 Okie dokie drama llama. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eva unit zero 271 Report post Posted February 12, 2006 FYI, Salei ($1.8) does not make less than Witt ($1.67). I must have been reversing their salary figures. Regardless, I would pay 1.8 for Salei. I don't know if I would even pay 1m for Witt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RyanBarnes! 293 Report post Posted February 12, 2006 I must have been reversing their salary figures. Regardless, I would pay 1.8 for Salei. I don't know if I would even pay 1m for Witt. I'd take Witt, because he would bring an edge to Detroit that Salei won't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eva unit zero 271 Report post Posted February 12, 2006 I must have been reversing their salary figures. Regardless, I would pay 1.8 for Salei. I don't know if I would even pay 1m for Witt. I'd take Witt, because he would bring an edge to Detroit that Salei won't. My point is that Witt is too high priced for what he would bring. You could spend the league minimum and get the same contributions of toughness, and not much of a different defensive game. Salei might not be the enforcer Witt can be..but he is a MUCH better player. And he's still a pretty tough and gritty player. It's not like he's Dandy or something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RyanBarnes! 293 Report post Posted February 12, 2006 I must have been reversing their salary figures. Regardless, I would pay 1.8 for Salei. I don't know if I would even pay 1m for Witt. I'd take Witt, because he would bring an edge to Detroit that Salei won't. My point is that Witt is too high priced for what he would bring. You could spend the league minimum and get the same contributions of toughness, and not much of a different defensive game. Salei might not be the enforcer Witt can be..but he is a MUCH better player. And he's still a pretty tough and gritty player. It's not like he's Dandy or something. I'd have to disagree. I believe Witt is the missing link. Salei isn't soft, but he wouldn't make a huge difference either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
J-Swift 0 Report post Posted February 13, 2006 Well if Witt and Salei aren't your cup of tea: Backchecking: Last line of defence The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reports that the Wild, facing the prospect of both Manny Fernandez and Dwayne Roloson leaving as unrestricted free agents, might be interested in acquiring a goaltending insurance policy. At the same time the St. Paul Pioneer Press suggests that some of the Wild's pending free agent defencemen, like Willie Mitchell, Filip Kuba, Andrei Zyuzin and Daniel Tjarnqvist might be on the move. Oh pretty, pretty please Holland? He's not particularly nasty, but he brings size, strength and solid one-on-one ability. Willie isn't exactly going to be an enforcer for us, but he's not exactly a stranger to dropping the gloves either. And at only a million bucks, he wouldn't be a bad deal at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seth 0 Report post Posted February 13, 2006 I would take Willie Mitchell and Kurtis Foster Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eva unit zero 271 Report post Posted February 13, 2006 I must have been reversing their salary figures. Regardless, I would pay 1.8 for Salei. I don't know if I would even pay 1m for Witt. I'd take Witt, because he would bring an edge to Detroit that Salei won't. My point is that Witt is too high priced for what he would bring. You could spend the league minimum and get the same contributions of toughness, and not much of a different defensive game. Salei might not be the enforcer Witt can be..but he is a MUCH better player. And he's still a pretty tough and gritty player. It's not like he's Dandy or something. I'd have to disagree. I believe Witt is the missing link. Salei isn't soft, but he wouldn't make a huge difference either. Witt is the missing link, huh? So you felt the Wings were primed and in position for the Cup before Fischer went down, then? Because Witt would bring an edge, but he would not make up for Fischer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
J-Swift 0 Report post Posted February 14, 2006 I must have been reversing their salary figures. Regardless, I would pay 1.8 for Salei. I don't know if I would even pay 1m for Witt. I'd take Witt, because he would bring an edge to Detroit that Salei won't. My point is that Witt is too high priced for what he would bring. You could spend the league minimum and get the same contributions of toughness, and not much of a different defensive game. Salei might not be the enforcer Witt can be..but he is a MUCH better player. And he's still a pretty tough and gritty player. It's not like he's Dandy or something. I'd have to disagree. I believe Witt is the missing link. Salei isn't soft, but he wouldn't make a huge difference either. Witt is the missing link, huh? So you felt the Wings were primed and in position for the Cup before Fischer went down, then? Because Witt would bring an edge, but he would not make up for Fischer. You're probably right. There's very few defenceman that can replace Fischer's size and speed on the blueline that are in our price range. Brendan Witt would, however, bring an element to the Wings that we are currently in need of, whether he's the missing link or not. Grit on the blueline is a bit of a problem (though Kronwall really helps), and I just don't think it makes sense to not replace a top four defenceman like Fischer with another top four defenceman. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
daniel1 32 Report post Posted February 15, 2006 I must have been reversing their salary figures. Regardless, I would pay 1.8 for Salei. I don't know if I would even pay 1m for Witt. I'd take Witt, because he would bring an edge to Detroit that Salei won't. My point is that Witt is too high priced for what he would bring. You could spend the league minimum and get the same contributions of toughness, and not much of a different defensive game. Salei might not be the enforcer Witt can be..but he is a MUCH better player. And he's still a pretty tough and gritty player. It's not like he's Dandy or something. I'd have to disagree. I believe Witt is the missing link. Salei isn't soft, but he wouldn't make a huge difference either. Witt is the missing link, huh? So you felt the Wings were primed and in position for the Cup before Fischer went down, then? Because Witt would bring an edge, but he would not make up for Fischer. Besides Witt, Salei, and Mitchell, who else could be available? Keeping in mind we're in the market for a stay at home type D-man who likes to hit and stand up for his teamates. Or at least I think we're in the market for a guy like this anyways. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RyanBarnes! 293 Report post Posted February 15, 2006 I must have been reversing their salary figures. Regardless, I would pay 1.8 for Salei. I don't know if I would even pay 1m for Witt. I'd take Witt, because he would bring an edge to Detroit that Salei won't. My point is that Witt is too high priced for what he would bring. You could spend the league minimum and get the same contributions of toughness, and not much of a different defensive game. Salei might not be the enforcer Witt can be..but he is a MUCH better player. And he's still a pretty tough and gritty player. It's not like he's Dandy or something. I'd have to disagree. I believe Witt is the missing link. Salei isn't soft, but he wouldn't make a huge difference either. Witt is the missing link, huh? So you felt the Wings were primed and in position for the Cup before Fischer went down, then? Because Witt would bring an edge, but he would not make up for Fischer. Witt brings an element this team is sorely lacking, maybe more so than Fischer did. He will not replace Fischer's overall game. The team has improved a lot since Babcock took over. They play tighter on defense and with more intensity upfront. If Detroit could land Witt I'd feel they'd improve their chances even further. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fatcat6 0 Report post Posted February 17, 2006 I still say that we'd be giving up way to much for Witt, and Witt is getting old anyways. I'd rather go with the young defensman that we have in the minors, and see how they do, and if a trade is needed, then Holland will make one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites