twins1729 0 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 I hate it when seems like they'll win at first and then lose in the end! It sucks! What happened guys? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingschamps 0 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 game. peace out til tuesday everyone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drake_Marcus 890 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 All divergent opinions must be obliterated. Value on personal opinion suggests compliance to the archaic individualistic, capitalistic style of thought. I've been fighting that here for my entire time here. *Sigh* Well I'm going to get food. I'll be back with a full belly. See you Tuesday Nashville Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Offsides 21 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 Ah well. I guess this is what that phrase means 'you lose some' I always wondered. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted March 11, 2007 PK Bad game , I hope Bert or Zetterberg or Cleary is ready for Nashville , we need at least one Sometimes you get the bear, and sometimes the bear gets you. Some of this game was simply bad luck. We already HAVE beaten Nashville with approximately this roster (minus Sammy, plus Franzen). You know what? As this game ended, it came to mind that, of all the times in which I've flipped on the TV to catch a Wings game, almost NEVER have they come away with a bad loss. Don't take that for granted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 I think that the Central just isn't meant to be ours this season (especially since the Central may mean the President's Trophy). Detroit penalty. i have to agree. Its kind of funny how everytime we have games in hand against so-so teams that will help us take over the central or get us closer, we always lose. Ill be fine with the 4th seed. Especially if the 5th is Turco and his stars. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
datsyukismyfriend 4 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 Ah well. I guess this is what that phrase means 'you lose some' I always wondered. LOL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted March 11, 2007 Can I make a pre-emptive request that people upset at the loss don't start a bunch of threads about who sucks are what all the Wings problems are? Keep the game stuff in the GDT. Harold for president! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 If I'm not mistaken, he's a -3 at the moment. He was out there for five of Boston's six goals. For him, that's terrible. Not that I'm saying he's bad, just that he's had either an off day or an unlucky one. Yeah, but he's on the ice for half the game. When the team plays bad, his numbers are going to be bad. I just don't remember him making a bad play is all I was saying. I know one of the goals was a 2-1 because of the Dats turnover and Kronnik being out of position. Then another was that weird change up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edicius 3,269 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 Same here. I guess the Wings were bound to lose in regulation at home eventually. Hadn't it been like 16 or 17 games? Something like that. Eh, streaks like that are ultimately meaningless. Especially when they end up with all sorts of qualifiers. xx game winning streak at home! Er, I mean, xx game point streak at home! Er, wait, I mean, xx game streak of, uhm, scoring in the first period! Yay! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted March 11, 2007 do you just come on here to rip on posters? are you really short? does your wife lay out your clothes for you in the morning. No, 5'9", single. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
esteef 2,679 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 The B's got the bounces today. Nice to see Booter stand up. How good was Huds effort huh?! Sammy and Calder both had some jump as well. Oh well... esteef Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
terri27 0 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 (edited) Well my day is officially off to a sucky start. Wings lose, hopefully Dale Earnhardt Jr. will do better today and cheer me up. Edited March 11, 2007 by terri27 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 The Wings are playing like they don't want first in the West. Anytime they have a chance, the don't show up for 60 minutes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
datsyukismyfriend 4 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 No, 5'9", single. must be the thin mountain air, not enought o2? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zetterberg is the man!! 0 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 OMG! THEY ARE LOSING A GAME!! OMG!! OMG!! WHAT?? DID ANAHEIM LOSE TO L.A. TWICE IN THE LAST COUPLE WEEKS? OMG! THEY WILL ALWAYS LOSE! WE NEED TO WIN EVERY GAME!! I'M A SPOILED-ASS FAN!! GIVE ME WINS, I'M ENTITLED! MY SENSE OF SECURITY REQUIRES WINS EVERY NIGHT!! IF YOU DON'T WIN THEN YOU SUCK AND YOU'RE COMMITTING AN AFFRONT AGAINST ME!! BOO HOOO. Are you less than 11 years old, by chance? Ok, fine. However, try to keep things in perspective. The thing is my father in law is a big Sabres fan and I have been busting his balls because the sabres lost 3 games in a row. And I told him that the Wings were going to kick the s*** out of the Bruins. Because the Wings lost now i'm going to hear it. DAMN IT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edicius 3,269 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 Can I make a pre-emptive request that people upset at the loss don't start a bunch of threads about who sucks are what all the Wings problems are? Keep the game stuff in the GDT. Harold...you're my hero. Always the voice of reason. 'twas a good game for some, bad game for most. We've got another chance to make it better in about 52 hours. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted March 11, 2007 (edited) The Wings are playing like they don't want first in the West. Anytime they have a chance, the don't show up for 60 minutes. Well, they're also missing 4 (5 with Bertuzzi) key players, one of whom is one of the best players in the NHL, and one of whom is replaced by Lilja. All told, I'd say they're doing ok. 2nd in the league ain't bad, man. Edited March 11, 2007 by Crymson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 All right, I'm outta here. If the Wings want first place, they're gonna have to do it the hard way head to head with the Preds. Should be good preparation for the playoffs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
datsyukismyfriend 4 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 The Wings are playing like they don't want first in the West. Anytime they have a chance, the don't show up for 60 minutes. i feel like they don't show up for 60 most of the time. they have the talent to win anyway, but sometimes it burns them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted March 11, 2007 The thing is my father in law is a big Sabres fan and I have been busting his balls because the sabres lost 3 games in a row. And I told him that the Wings were going to kick the s*** out of the Bruins. Because the Wings lost now i'm going to hear it. DAMN IT Eh, take comfort in the fact that being a Sabres fan makes him a dick anyway. Nothing he can do can take away the fact that, as a Wings fan, you are better thanhe is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heroes of Hockeytown 694 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 (edited) and sometimes your team plays very poorly. Well, I don't doubt that from the forty minutes I saw. They were winning at the end of twenty minutes I didn't see, but that doesn't necessarily reflect effort so... Wings seem to always have trouble on these afternoon games, which is cause for concern given that playoff games will eventually be scheduled early. This loss seems to be the result of of injuries and a randomly-supplied poor effort (which is the bane of all teams). We ought to just mooove right along here and not pay it too much mind, for serious. Edited March 11, 2007 by Heroes of Hockeytown Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 Well, they're also missing 4 (5 with Bertuzzi) key players, one of whom is one of the best players in the NHL, and one of whom is replaced by Lilja. All told, I'd say they're doing ok. 2nd in the league ain't bad, man. True. I forget how many guys were missing. It's just disheartening to see some of the defensive breakdowns though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edicius 3,269 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 The Wings are playing like they don't want first in the West. Anytime they have a chance, the don't show up for 60 minutes. That's the way I see it. They'd want the Central if it didn't mean that it'll likely mean 1st in the West. That's not to say that they're deliberately losing games or anything like that, but it has to be a subconscious thing going on. Personally, I'd like the Wings to enter the postseason as something other than a #1 or #2 seed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted March 11, 2007 must be the thin mountain air, not enought o2? Doubtful. I daresay my hemoglobin count has long since elevated to compensate. By the way, oxygen volume does not change with altitude; only pressure does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites