Kp-Wings 3 Report post Posted October 16, 2007 Yawn. Like I said, I've yet to see a real argument as to why Hank is better. You don't support anything you say. I esp. like the physicality supposition. Wake up. These two are essentially skill players and commenting on their relative physicality is like saying your Pinto is more of a "muscle car" than your brother's Omni. This my own opinion. I'm sorry we can't all agree on the same thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted October 16, 2007 Yawn. Like I said, I've yet to see a real argument as to why Hank is better. You don't support anything you say. I esp. like the physicality supposition. Wake up. These two are essentially skill players and commenting on their relative physicality is like saying your Pinto is more of a "muscle car" than your brother's Omni. It's a tough call, but overall I'd go with Zetterberg. And I think people have brought up legitimate points. Z is the better two way player. He doesn't have the crazy moves that Datsyuk does, but he's harder to move off the puck. The Wings are a puck possession team and Hank is a puck possession beast. He's a better penalty killer. And just from watching the game, I feel like Zetterberg is a factor in the game on a more consistent basis. Datsyuk can go unnoticed in one game, then light it up the next. If you're looking for some empirical evidence, Zetterberg averages about a minute more ice time per game than Datsyuk. Why do you think that is? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
datsyukismyfriend 4 Report post Posted October 16, 2007 If you're looking for some empirical evidence, Zetterberg averages about a minute more ice time per game than Datsyuk. Why do you think that is? because, on average, he's on the ice about a minute longer than datsyuk per game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spydrwebb 0 Report post Posted October 16, 2007 both Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
