Hank 0 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 Lecavailer - Zetterberg Iginla - Datsyuk Lucic - Filpulla Brett Burns - Kronwall Steve Downie - Hudler Keep the flames to a minimum please. Just wanted to see what people thought. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StaticWithABeat 0 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 Yes, yes, yes yes, and yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerm8352 3 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 I would do everyone one of them in a heartbeat except the Kronwall one only because I don't know much about Brett Burns. The rest are no brainers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hank 0 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 I would do everyone one of them in a heartbeat except the Kronwall one only because I don't know much about Brett Burns. The rest are no brainers. This is only my personal opinion but I think Burns is going to be one heck of a defensman. He's still very young but many feel he'll be regarded in the same category as Phaneuf and Shea Weber in a couple of years. In fact, a lot of hockey analysts think he'll be on the Canadian Olympic team in 2010. Size, strength, great hands, speed. Could be a good one for years to come. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
umredwing11 2 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 Lecavailer - Zetterberg Iginla - Datsyuk Lucic - Filpulla Brett Burns - Kronwall Steve Downie - Hudler Keep the flames to a minimum please. Just wanted to see what people thought. I'd say yes to all of them except Iginla for Datsyuk. I like the way Iginla plays, but I can't get enough of watching Pavs play, both offensively and defensively. Other than that, the rest of the "trades" are no brainers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toby91_ca 620 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 It's Brent Burns not Brett right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dallas27 7 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 I don't see how you swap one of the most dangerous players in the offensive zone that also leads the league in takeaways. I wouldn't get rid of Z either purely based on the chemistry him and Dats have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jim3033 1 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 Downie for Hudler. That's it. Getting rid of Datsyuk and Z for anyone would be ridiculous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 It's Brent Burns not Brett right? Yup. I would do all of these deals. But Im not sure I would do all of them together. Why? Wed have barely any centers. So we might have to pass on Lucic for Filppula and keep him as our #2 center. Although I really like Lucic. But just for s***s...yeah Id do all of them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 You guys wouldnt trade Iggy and Lecavalier for Hank and Datsyuk. Youre talking about the two most complete players in the league here...skilled, scoring, big, physical, fighting, team leading, PKing, good skating forwards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
babygorilla 1 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 SCHHHWWWIIIINNNGGGG. I mean, yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yzerfan1999 81 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 I'd say no to both the Z and D deals, simply because I like them both. Lec. and Iggy may be better players, but Z and D are still great and form the nucleus of the team. I'd keep em for sentimental reasons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,804 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 The way Hudler is playing right now, I can't think of anyone I wouldn't trade him for, other than Lapperierre. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BeeRYCE 2 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 Everyone except Kronwall, yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dallas27 7 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 You guys wouldnt trade Iggy and Lecavalier for Hank and Datsyuk. Youre talking about the two most complete players in the league here...skilled, scoring, big, physical, fighting, team leading, PKing, good skating forwards. There is more than skill (Z isn't too far behind those two in terms of a complete player), are Iggy and Lecavalier going to have the same chemistry as Z and Dats? Maybe, but you don't know that. I would do it in NHL 08. Otherwise no, I wouldn't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LionsAndRedwingsAndPistonsOhMy 3 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 Lecavailer - Zetterberg = No Iginla - Datsyuk = No Lucic - Filpulla = No Brett Burns - Kronwall =No Idea about Burns, can't even guess Steve Downie - Hudler = Yes Lecavailer and Iginla......would LOVE to have either, but not at the expense of the D&Z chemistry. For some reason, I really like Filpulla......so that's for personal reasons only. If I were a GM, I might change my tune. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Canadian Wings Report post Posted February 19, 2008 I'd only do the Iginla and Downie deals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kingston 21 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 Lecavailer - Zetterberg ( Nah , Ken would never. and i won't to. ) Iginla - Datsyuk ( Same Goes for Hank ) Lucic - Filpulla ( Nah, who Lucic is he any good? ) Brett Burns - Kronwall ( Nope ) Steve Downie - Hudler ( Yes! He's a Good phsical Playing and we need that to protect the puck ) Keep the flames to a minimum please. Just wanted to see what people thought. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Opie 308 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 (edited) While I would love to have any of the first 3 I would not want to have them at the expense of the players you suggest. Call me Homer, call me ignorant, but I would rather root for the guys on the team, if they get traded fine I will root for who comes in. These threads (no offense meant Hank) are why people think Wing's fans are spoiled. BTW Kingston Lucic plays for the B's and if you like young guys who can't can hit, fight, and score goals he is your man. Edited because I am an idiot!!! Edited February 19, 2008 by Opie Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingslogo19 281 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 I would love to see Lucic in a Wings jersey.. I love the kid, and he's a local boy too Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 While I would love to have any of the first 3 I would not want to have them at the expense of the players you suggest. Call me Homer, call me ignorant, but I would rather root for the guys on the team, if they get traded fine I will root for who comes in. These threads (no offense meant Hank) are why people think Wing's fans are spoiled. BTW Kingston Lucic plays for the B's and if you like young guys who can't hit, fight, and score goals he is your man. Did you seriously just suggest that Lucic can't do any of those things? Hes a great hitter and hes already taken down some heavies in this league, and hes only a rookie! Not to mention hes 19 years old and is on pace for 27 points on a full season averaging less than 11 minutes a game. Thats certainly not bad for a teenager playing for the almighty Bruins.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reds4Life 51 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 Lecavailer - Zetterberg = No way. Iginla - Datsyuk = Never. Lucic - Filpulla = Maybe. Brett Burns - Kronwall = Never. Steve Downie - Hudler = Maybe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,804 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 While I would love to have any of the first 3 I would not want to have them at the expense of the players you suggest. Call me Homer, call me ignorant, but I would rather root for the guys on the team, if they get traded fine I will root for who comes in. These threads (no offense meant Hank) are why people think Wing's fans are spoiled. BTW Kingston Lucic plays for the B's and if you like young guys who can't hit, fight, and score goals he is your man. You got things the other way around. All those things you described apply to Fillpulla, especially his recent play, and not to Lucic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Opie 308 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 Did you seriously just suggest that Lucic can't do any of those things? Hes a great hitter and hes already taken down some heavies in this league, and hes only a rookie! Not to mention hes 19 years old and is on pace for 27 points on a full season averaging less than 11 minutes a game. Thats certainly not bad for a teenager playing for the almighty Bruins.. NO!!!!!! not at all, my bad I meant can, NOT CAN"T!!!!!!!!!! My bad!!!!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted February 19, 2008 There is more than skill (Z isn't too far behind those two in terms of a complete player), are Iggy and Lecavalier going to have the same chemistry as Z and Dats? Maybe, but you don't know that. I would do it in NHL 08. Otherwise no, I wouldn't. Who said Iggy and Lecavalier would be playing on the same line? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
