Wings_Dynasty 267 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 (edited) Right now the Wings have 183 goals against and 1 game left. The Ducks have 186 and 2 games left. So, the Wings need to let in less than 3 goals on Sunday and/or hope for the Ducks to not shut out there opponents in the next 2 games. I'm sure the Wings won't let in 6 goals again ( ) but all I'm saying is that they can't just sit back and relax if they want Oz and Dom to have the trophy. Play tight and put it out of reach. Edited April 4, 2008 by Wings_Dynasty Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doggy 130 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 You mean the Jennings? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wings_Dynasty 267 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 (edited) You mean the Jennings? Damn it... EDIT: thanks mods. Edited April 4, 2008 by Wings_Dynasty Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zion 93 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 Can't edit, but can remind you of the following: FAIL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cicada 4 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 never the less, the jenning trophy is good to win... shows we have the best defense Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timothy1997 0 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 (edited) the MASTERTON (not masterson) trophy is awarded to the player who best exemplifies the qualities of perseverance, sportsmanship, and dedication to ice hockey. Here is what the trophy looks like. No team can win this trophy. Individual award only. Edited April 4, 2008 by timothy1997 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
McCartyFanForLife 17 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 Jennings would be a great trophy to win. Of course one of our players winning the Masterson would be cool too... Sorry Wings_Dynasty... don't mean to pile on, but I couldn't help it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hallelujahlogic 1 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 holy woah, you guys are brutal! i hope i never misspeak in here.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timothy1997 0 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 holy woah, you guys are brutal! i hope i never misspeak in here.... its mispoke. You hope you never mispoke in here. Misspeak or misspeaking is refering to the 3rd person. Consider this your warning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
McCartyFanForLife 17 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 its mispoke. You hope you never mispoke in here. Misspeak or misspeaking is refering to the 3rd person. Consider this your warning. Woah, maybe we should get Matt to include a grammar checker along with the spell checker. I may have to google search to determine if I need to use 'who' or 'whom' in the future... Oh, and it's spelled referring, not 'refering'... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edicius 3,269 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 Your all stupid. And if you can't tell I did that on purpose, I'll smack you with a trout. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
McCartyFanForLife 17 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 Your all stupid. And if you can't tell I did that on purpose, I'll smack you with a trout. LOL, a trout. That's awesome. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Creasemonkey 30 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 Your all stupid. And if you can't tell I did that on purpose, I'll smack you with a trout. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Viperar 16 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 hahaha sweet video Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
arnoldbuck 0 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 I'm not entirely sure what I just woke up to, but thank you all, this thread put a smile on my face. Have a nice day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wings_Dynasty 267 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 Can't edit, but can remind you of the following: FAIL All in, I've got a douchebag full house. Thanks for adding to the topic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grsbmd 0 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 I think the race is actually a little closer, even than that. I was reading at HFBoards that shootout goals don't count toward the Jennings trophy. And if I remember, the actual mark is: Red Wings 81 GP 178 GA Ducks 80 GP 179 GA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Leary Biscuit Report post Posted April 4, 2008 I think the race is actually a little closer, even than that. I was reading at HFBoards that shootout goals don't count toward the Jennings trophy. And if I remember, the actual mark is: Red Wings 81 GP 178 GA Ducks 80 GP 179 GA where are you getting this from? nhl.com lists as 183 and 186 and i don't think that includes shootouts, though i'm not certain. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doggy 130 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 where are you getting this from? nhl.com lists as 183 and 186 and i don't think that includes shootouts, though i'm not certain. His numbers are correct, the NHL standings stats do include SO goals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hallelujahlogic 1 Report post Posted April 4, 2008 (edited) its mispoke. You hope you never mispoke in here. Misspeak or misspeaking is refering to the 3rd person. Consider this your warning. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/misspeak mis·speak /mɪsˈspik/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[mis-speek] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –verb (used with object), verb (used without object), -spoke, -spok·en, -speak·ing. 1.to speak, utter, or pronounce incorrectly. 2.to speak inaccurately, inappropriately, or too hastily. [Origin: 1150–1200; ME misspeken; see mis-1, speak; cf. OE missprecan to murmur] Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006. and you spelled 'referring' incorrectly. Edited April 4, 2008 by hallelujahlogic Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Leary Biscuit Report post Posted April 4, 2008 His numbers are correct, the NHL standings stats do include SO goals. well that's kind of silly, the goals don't count towards the players stats why should they be reflected on the standings Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spyder 0 Report post Posted April 5, 2008 The only trophy that matters is the Stanley Cup. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OsGOD 3 Report post Posted April 5, 2008 The only trophy that matters is the Stanley Cup. and venzinas... you can't forget those!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
imisssergei 0 Report post Posted April 5, 2008 well that's kind of silly, the goals don't count towards the players stats why should they be reflected on the standings From the NHL Official Rulebook, 84.4 ...."The losing goalkeeper will not be charged with the extra goal against. The player scoring the game-winning goal in the shootout will not be credited with a goal scored in his personal statistics." I've searched and searched, and I can't seem to find anything that says if the SO goals count in the teams GA or not. I guess the only way to find out for sure it to tally up all 81 games played and find out. Any volunteers? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted April 5, 2008 (edited) For those wanting to know, WITHOUT shootout goals Detroit: 178 GA, 1 game remaining San Jose: 183 GA, 1 game remaining Anaheim: 179 GA, 2 games remaining (this afternoon against LA, they already have 2 goals against, so they currently sit at 181) Basically if Detroit lets in 2 goals tomorrow or less, they lock it up. EDIT: LA has just scored again on Anaheim, so Detroit now has a 3 goal cushion. 3GA tomorrow and they still win it. Edited April 5, 2008 by YoungGuns1340 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
