• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
96warrior

Forsberg out of game 4

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

http://redwingscorner.blogspot.com/

Forsberg out for Game 4

Colorado coach Joel Quenneville just announced that Peter Forsberg and Ryan Smyth will not be in the lineup for tonight's Game 4. With Paul Stastny also out, the Avalanche will dress seven defensemen. That means they'll skate three forward lines, rotating two extra forwards in.

"We realized (Forsberg) had health issues when he came here," said Quenneville.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://redwingscorner.blogspot.com/

Forsberg out for Game 4

Colorado coach Joel Quenneville just announced that Peter Forsberg and Ryan Smyth will not be in the lineup for tonight's Game 4. With Paul Stastny also out, the Avalanche will dress seven defensemen. That means they'll skate three forward lines, rotating two extra forwards in.

"We realized (Forsberg) had health issues when he came here," said Quenneville.

Nooooohhhh? You don't say Joel? What health issues could he possibly be talking about?

I can't bring myself to cheer for the Wings tonight knowing that the divealanche are undermanned like this. It's just not fair I tell you.

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am eternally grateful we didn't actively persue him or he refused our advances, whatever the case may be (Thank you, hockey gods!), but I have to admit that the Avs definitely play better with him in the lineup for whatever reason. If Wings win tonight, this series will have an asterisk next to it because of the laundry list of injuries Colorado is suffering right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice deadline acquisition, Avs.

Imagine if we had wasted time on him. Yeesh.

strange how both Forsberg and Lindros, who were both traded as rookies from Quebec to Philly, and Philly to Quebec....both ended up so injury prone over their entire careers, yet they were so heavily anticipated and marketed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am eternally grateful we didn't actively persue him or he refused our advances, whatever the case may be (Thank you, hockey gods!), but I have to admit that the Avs definitely play better with him in the lineup for whatever reason. If Wings win tonight, this series will have an asterisk next to it because of the laundry list of injuries Colorado is suffering right now.

Anaheim's series against Detroit last year should have an asterisk next to it too, in that case. It sucks but those are the breaks of the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am eternally grateful we didn't actively persue him or he refused our advances, whatever the case may be (Thank you, hockey gods!), but I have to admit that the Avs definitely play better with him in the lineup for whatever reason. If Wings win tonight, this series will have an asterisk next to it because of the laundry list of injuries Colorado is suffering right now.

Its just how it works sometimes....but Pavel and Hank have played with injuries during playoff series', and there aren't asterisks next to those.

Screw the Avs, they've made bad personnel and coaching moves, players were hurt at inopportune moments, and the Wings did what you have to do with a wounded opponent, and that is dominate them. No asterisk necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
strange how both Forsberg and Lindros, who were both traded as rookies from Quebec to Philly, and Philly to Quebec....both ended up so injury prone over their entire careers, yet they were so heavily anticipated and marketed.

Forsberg had much more success imo. But recently he's had major issues. I'm glad the Wings didn't land him. The Wings better take care of things tonight when they are down 3 big name players like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its just how it works sometimes....but Pavel and Hank have played with injuries during playoff series', and there aren't asterisks next to those.

Screw the Avs, they've made bad personnel and coaching moves, players were hurt at inopportune moments, and the Wings did what you have to do with a wounded opponent, and that is dominate them. No asterisk necessary.

They starting making dumb moves, I thought, way back when they kept trading away so many guys for Bourque and Blake and Kasperitis. Trading Drury for Derek Morris? I know Drury might not be there now but that was a dumb move. And I love how so many people kept saying the Wings were old and everything and wouldn't make it post lockout and they have made a nice transition to a little younger of a team and a team well under the cap. Unlike the Rangers who were at the cap and will probably be swept tonight. Now I hope they can get out of the WCF's this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice deadline acquisition, Avs.

Imagine if we had wasted time on him. Yeesh.

The thing is though, we had/have the cap space and we have plenty of depth to afford the gamble. He would kinda be like a side-gig.

Think like a businessman who happens to be a great musician too. He's got his 9-5 and it's more than enough money, but he's got the music gigs at night every now and again and the money he makes there is just a bonus. If it slows down, no deal, he's still got the 9-5 to get by.

I'm not saying that I'm upset we didn't get him, but it wouldn't have been the blow to us as it is to a team that doesn't have as much depth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anaheim's series against Detroit last year should have an asterisk next to it too, in that case. It sucks but those are the breaks of the game.

My thoughts exactly. Injuries are part of the game. We're taking advantage of the Avs' injuries this year. Anaheim did the same with us last year. No asterisks necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am eternally grateful we didn't actively persue him or he refused our advances, whatever the case may be (Thank you, hockey gods!), but I have to admit that the Avs definitely play better with him in the lineup for whatever reason. If Wings win tonight, this series will have an asterisk next to it because of the laundry list of injuries Colorado is suffering right now.

I don't agree. Those are the breaks when it comes in the playoffs. If people want to look at it that way, what's to stop them (aside from Chris Chelios--BTW, where has sirdrake been?) from saying that about the Wings-Ducks series last year minus 2 of their top 3 defensemen?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forsberg had much more success imo. But recently he's had major issues. I'm glad the Wings didn't land him. The Wings better take care of things tonight when they are down 3 big name players like that.

you're right, Forsberg ended up being a much better player IMHO too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The thing is though, we had/have the cap space and we have plenty of depth to afford the gamble. He would kinda be like a side-gig.

Think like a businessman who happens to be a great musician too. He's got his 9-5 and it's more than enough money, but he's got the music gigs at night every now and again and the money he makes there is just a bonus. If it slows down, no deal, he's still got the 9-5 to get by.

I'm not saying that I'm upset we didn't get him, but it wouldn't have been the blow to us as it is to a team that doesn't have as much depth.

Sidenote: Who works a 9-5 these days? All I know is a 7:30-5:30/6:00. Where can I sign up for one of those? :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sidenote: Who works a 9-5 these days? All I know is a 7:30-5:30/6:00. Where can I sign up for one of those? :D

9(ish... more like 9:10) - 5 right here... cause they don't pay anything over with the economy so i don't give them any more than 8hours

Edited by OsGOD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't agree. Those are the breaks when it comes in the playoffs. If people want to look at it that way, what's to stop them (aside from Chris Chelios--BTW, where has sirdrake been?) from saying that about the Wings-Ducks series last year minus 2 of their top 3 defensemen?

Yeah, we've disagreed a lot lately and I've been ignoring you intentionally after your claim Forsberg had no intent in the high stick. Absolutely he did. Maybe not to chop off Sammie's head, but there was definitely intent there. *scowling at you*

And you know darn well that winning this series will be no big deal if half their corps is out. "Wings beat Colorado's farm club to advance to WCF."

sirdrake is alive and well as far as I know, but what's to stop Chris Chelios from banning him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9(ish... more like 9:10) - 5 right here... cause they don't pay anything over with the economy so i don't give them any more than 8hours

Salary or Hourly?

Sorry, back on topic......Foresberg never should've came back.

Edited by Never Forget Mac #25

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, it would probably be better for us if he DID play tonight based on the fact that he helped the Wings bag two goals in Game 3!!!

So far, the "part-time" NHL'ers aren't fairing to well this play-offs...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't agree. Those are the breaks when it comes in the playoffs. If people want to look at it that way, what's to stop them (aside from Chris Chelios--BTW, where has sirdrake been?) from saying that about the Wings-Ducks series last year minus 2 of their top 3 defensemen?

Exactly. I mean just put Schneider back in the lineup and I honestly think the Wings win that series last year. Or how about 2001? Wings were minus 2 of their top 3 players against the Kings. No Yzerman or Shanny and I think I remember McCarty and Chelios both playing pretty banged up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait...did he say they 'realized' he had health issues? He didn't say they 'knew' he had health issues? Like it was a big secret??? Something they have come to realize??? WTF?? What an ass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sidenote: Who works a 9-5 these days? All I know is a 7:30-5:30/6:00. Where can I sign up for one of those? :D

Personally, I'm aiming for the 8-11 musicians gig myself...classically trained music major becomes rock guitar hero...sounds good to me considering I couldn't find any college that had a "rockstar" program.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this