10/29 GDT: Ducks 5, Red Wings 4 (OT)

[Jedi 1,865]

BAD call... That was above the crossbar...

But, getting one point out of that is more than we deserved... After letting them score 3 straight to get back into it, we didn't deserve the W...

[Guest Shoreline]

As much as I dont think we deserved to win the game. That is BS thats a high stick for sure.

Indeed. This game doesn't get to OT without the Wings undisciplined play. Even despite the refs dumbf***ery.

[heed316 7]

At least I have Getzlaf on my fantasy team

[haroldsnepsts 4,826]

It was called a goal on the ice. that's most important because then the video has to overruled it.

Unless the review officials had some magical angles to definitely tell it was over the crossbar, I didn't see anything clear enough to overturn it. It looked pretty f-ing close, but still.

Either way, it's not like the Wings deserved 2 points the way they played tonight. Man did Raf get undressed by Getzlaf.

Edited October 30, 2008 by haroldsnepsts

[robat 13]

blow me anaheim!

[redwings1914 18]

Funny how we almost win every game even though stuff like this always happens

[cirov19 1]

That was definately a high-stick...

should've been no goal.

Either way Wings played garbage tonight and tomorrow we're gonna be tired... gotta be able to fight it out because San Jose is not gonna be good about it.

I'm f***in pissed.

[Pskov Wings Fan 71]

At least I have Getzlaf on my fantasy team

I also got Selanne and Dats

[Hatchet Barry 71]

That (no goal) goal was a joke. Just like this frustrating joke of a game.

[Systemfel 33]

What the f***! That is not below the crossbar.

[Guest Shoreline]

The refs dont decied if it's a goal.

So I guess that pointing down at the net they do doesn't mean s***, does it? Especially if the blind review staff think maybe it's too close to call.

Edited October 30, 2008 by Shoreline

[SoDakWing 8]

well hell... 1 point is better than 0... and besides

we are 7-1-2

damn good for the first 10 games played

[wingschamps 0]

Are they kidding???

[seeinred 1,488]

40 pages for a 10 PM game and 5 assists for Getzlaf. Crazy night indeed.

[j.hoop 64]

man this was a terrible game. these are not the wings i know. 10 5on3s?? un-*******-real. bad calls or not, we sucked hard this game. at least we got one point

[DyingAlive 27]

I hate the Ducks.

Atleast we get a point boys. For a game we could have gotten none.

[YoungGuns1340 1]

Man...that was 100% above the crossbar. Not sure how you could say otherwise.

[GoWings1905 2,694]

Bulls***. That was a high stick.

Frustrating game all the way around. Oh well, another chance tomorrow.

[Reilly 24]

It was called a goal on the ice. that's most important because then the video has to overruled it.

You're confusing the NHL with the NFL. The call on the ice has nothing to do once a goal goes to video review.

[Dano33 41]

At least I have Getzlaf on my fantasy team

i thought about mentioning that too.

[robat 13]

So I guess that pointing down at the net they do doesn't mean s***, does it? Especially if the blind refs think maybe it's too close to call.

Just saying, in the end, the refs didn't decide it was a goal. They could have called it no goal and it could have been overturned to a goal...

Edited October 30, 2008 by robat

[haroldsnepsts 4,826]

you guys all must have better eyes than me.

It's only when the stick contacts the puck. And from the angles I saw, it was really freaking close. The camera wasn't straight on, so I couldn't tell if it was really above or not.

[Z and D for the C 712]

I ******* hate the ducks.

[Guest MrSandMan]

So high stick goals count now? Mighty Ducks are pathetic.

[redwings4life 3]

Ducks score 1 goal not on the powerplay and then the wings get screwed with an obvious high stick