Mike 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 I am getting sick of this juggling the goal tender crap. Conks should have started tonight. The Wings juggle goalies all the time though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueMonk 102 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 Schedule loss. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheOwl 77 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 The Wings juggle goalies all the time though. That's because the Wings used to have 2 equally good goalies. Lets get Curtis Joseph back!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 He's not had that many chances. This was a bad game to play him. The Wild rarely let in more then 2-3 goals, big pressure to not let any in. Should of played him against LA next week, where he could let in 4 or 5 and the team would still win. Either way, Osgood wouldn't of performed any better. It's Conklin or nothing boys. Conks has played great, so there is nothing wrong with that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shaman 713 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 (edited) He's not had that many chances. This was a bad game to play him. The Wild rarely let in more then 2-3 goals, big pressure to not let any in. Should of played him against LA next week, where he could let in 4 or 5 and the team would still win. Either way, Osgood wouldn't of performed any better. It's Conklin or nothing boys. Howard HAS NEVER been consistent in the AHL why does anyone think he'll do any better in the NHL, he goes 4 games and cant win one, then plays 6 great, he never is able to play 10 good games, its always one extreme or another, he is not a great goalie, and obviously the team knows that or else they wouldnt have gone out and gotten Conklin.... Imagine what next year could be like... ....Ozzy 55+ games and Howard 27 or so.....I already need a drink Edited February 22, 2009 by Shaman464 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Statts 4 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 (edited) He's not proving otherwise and he's had his fair share of chances. He hasn't had a fair share of chances really. Edited February 22, 2009 by Statts Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 That's because the Wings used to have 2 equally good goalies. Lets get Curtis Joseph back!!! I think we should go chasing after Backstrom. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTU_Huskies963 398 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 The Wings juggle goalies all the time though. The sad thing is Conks could have shut out the ducks last night, and still probably would have not got the start tonight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
union drone 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 That is suspicious. You must have stolen our team. GIVE US OUR TEAM BACK! Sneaky Duck Guy... We must not have gotten the Giguere bed mattresses as part of the trade. We could have used them tonight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barrie 900 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 It might be time to start playing Conks like he is the #1. It doesn't matter who's in net, we need to score more than 2 goals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 The sad thing is Conks could have shut out the ducks last night, and still probably would have not got the start tonight. I have never seen the Wings try so hard to not have a regular starting goalie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheOwl 77 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 Howard HAS NEVER been consistent in the AHL why does anyone think he'll do any better in the NHL, he goes 4 games and cant win one, then plays 6 great, he never is able to play 10 good games, its always one extreme or another, he is not a great goalie, and obviously the team knows that or else they wouldnt have gone out and gotten Conklin.... Imagine what next year could be like... ....Ozzy 55+ games and Howard 27 or so.....I already need a drink Sounds more like we'll miss the entire play-offs We need a goalie for next season anyways, no time like the present to grab a cheap one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greenrebellion 415 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 ....Ozzy 55+ games and Howard 27 or so.....I already need a drink Ya, goaltending could definitely be a problem next year. In the meantime, name Conklin number 1 and pray for the best. Oh and our PK is driving me NUTS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dat's sick 1,002 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 It might be time to start playing Conks like he is the #1. Definitely. The team always looks so much better in front of Conklin. I can't remember a total brainfart of a game like tonight when we've had Conks in net. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ms_Hockey 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 Howard didn't play well - but most of our team didn't. We were slow, we made sloppy passes, and we didn't seem to wake up until it was too late. I wasn't expecting a lot out of Howard. He had some good saves.. but ultimately, our entire team wasn't up to par. Congratulations to the Wild - they deserved the win & they worked hard for it. Now let's take these three days and get out there to make some Shark food out of San Jose. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 It doesn't matter who's in net, we need to score more than 2 goals. I agree, but we shouldn't have to constantly put up 5 goals to have a chance to win a game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
union drone 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 Howard didn't play well - but most of our team didn't. We were slow, we made sloppy passes, and we didn't seem to wake up until it was too late. I wasn't expecting a lot out of Howard. He had some good saves.. but ultimately, our entire team wasn't up to par. Congratulations to the Wild - they deserved the win & they worked hard for it. Now let's take these three days and get out there to make some Shark food out of San Jose. A win against the Sharks will certainly help make me forget about tonight Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ms_Hockey 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 I am getting sick of this juggling the goal tender crap. Conks should have started tonight. Well, I can understand the reasoning behind it. The reality of Conklin being a starting goalie for another team next season is very real. After that, we have Osgood, Howard, and Ericsson. (Excuse my spelling if I got it wrong.) Management obviously felt Osgood needed time to just work with a goaltending coach - and they probably wanted to see how Howard would fare in terms of being the backup next season for Osgood. So while Conklin is the best we have right now, the Wings could afford this loss - and they knew that. There's a lot more to think about than just coming out on top during the regular season. We're a solid lock for the playoffs - three points away from San Jose. There wasn't a whole lot to lose. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 Howard didn't play well - but most of our team didn't. We were slow, we made sloppy passes, and we didn't seem to wake up until it was too late. I wasn't expecting a lot out of Howard. He had some good saves.. but ultimately, our entire team wasn't up to par. Congratulations to the Wild - they deserved the win & they worked hard for it. Now let's take these three days and get out there to make some Shark food out of San Jose. Great summary of the game. These 3 days of rest will do the Wings some good. They need to really hammer down because the Sharks are, as of today, the best in the NHL. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
datsyukismyfriend 4 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 what a s***ty game. what are we going to do for goal in the future. howard obviously isn't it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ms_Hockey 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 A win against the Sharks will certainly help make me forget about tonight If we could pull another shut out against them, I'd be euphoric for days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duck Guy 86 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 Well you got to think of it like this also... you have a goalie that has not had alot of NHL experience the team playing in front of him just got done with a game last night. I did not see the game at all so I cant really judge his performance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
union drone 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 Well, I can understand the reasoning behind it. The reality of Conklin being a starting goalie for another team next season is very real. After that, we have Osgood, Howard, and Ericsson. (Excuse my spelling if I got it wrong.) Management obviously felt Osgood needed time to just work with a goaltending coach - and they probably wanted to see how Howard would fare in terms of being the backup next season for Osgood. So while Conklin is the best we have right now, the Wings could afford this loss - and they knew that. There's a lot more to think about than just coming out on top during the regular season. We're a solid lock for the playoffs - three points away from San Jose. There wasn't a whole lot to lose. True. We had more to gain by experimenting than we had to lose by getting beat. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTU_Huskies963 398 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 Well, I can understand the reasoning behind it. The reality of Conklin being a starting goalie for another team next season is very real. After that, we have Osgood, Howard, and Ericsson. (Excuse my spelling if I got it wrong.) Management obviously felt Osgood needed time to just work with a goaltending coach - and they probably wanted to see how Howard would fare in terms of being the backup next season for Osgood. So while Conklin is the best we have right now, the Wings could afford this loss - and they knew that. There's a lot more to think about than just coming out on top during the regular season. We're a solid lock for the playoffs - three points away from San Jose. There wasn't a whole lot to lose. True but we should make the push to pass the sharks for home ice advantage through the west. The sharks are just that dangerous at home, and we suck in the shark tank. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike 0 Report post Posted February 22, 2009 Roloson is putting on a show in Edmonton. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites