soultrain 43 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 So this 16 year old "fan of hockey" thinks she is the authortity on everything...she is really full of s***. i found this comment when i woke up this morning and thought it was amazing! "Fu*k you and your Red Wings!!! Shut up. It wasn't even the Red Wings playing that won them the game, it was the stupid refs and Toronto that did it! They did not play any better than the Sharks did. Did you watch the same game that I did? The Red Wings must be paying people off, they sure get special treatment. That's probably why they won the cup. Bunch of fu*king cheaters. We'll see you in the Western Conference Finals. You sure are a sore winner though. Calling those guys winners is a stretch."-Shark Asylum (Team Team)-myspace Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline Report post Posted February 26, 2009 (edited) It happens. When calls don't go your way, you ***** about the refs being in on some conspiracy against your team. I see it here too. Edited February 26, 2009 by Shoreline Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeinred 1,488 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 It happens. When calls don't go your way, you ***** about the refs being in on some conspiracy against your team. I see it here too. That's because there is a conspiracy against the Red Wings, and last night's no goal call was just to throw us off. Duh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xBrave_Heartx 0 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 I think that goal should of counted. the ref was enthusiastic that he saw the puck cross the line. wouldn't of mattered anyway Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maltbymaniac 13 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 that was just randomly put on your myspace,or from someone you know? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
soultrain 43 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 that was just randomly put on your myspace,or from someone you know? a big fan of my band...we are from the same town...she is a true blue sharks fan...she still thinks cheechoo is a top forward...just got a good chuckle out of this one....the goal didn't count. you need to see "white" behind the puck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shaman 713 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 That's because there is a conspiracy against the Red Wings, and last night's no goal call was just to throw us off. Duh. I keep on telling you guys about the Secret Hockey Command and Control Bunker 50000 feet below Toronto where Gary Bettman, Colin Campbell, and Dan O'Halloran spend all day plotting against the wings while partaking of the service of the in house man-***** Cindy Crosby.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NomadFromKazoo 42 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 a big fan of my band...we are from the same town...she is a true blue sharks fan...she still thinks cheechoo is a top forward...just got a good chuckle out of this one....the goal didn't count. you need to see "white" behind the puck. Exactly. I can certainly see thinking it "should" count as a goal, it felt like we were scored on. But the rule was followed. Don't like it, get it changed, don't expect it to be called the way you want the rule to read. Anyway, she's a kid, just more commenting on the situation. Sharks fans are among the most fanatical. Having lived in San Jose where sports is usually a casual thing, the Sharks are the clear exception. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Taylorov 37 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 I was really surprised they kept calling penalties against the Sharks last night while we were up. I was totally waiting for the lets-even-things-up-with-a 5 on 3. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline Report post Posted February 26, 2009 (edited) I was really surprised they kept calling penalties against the Sharks last night while we were up. I was totally waiting for the lets-even-things-up-with-a 5 on 3. 3rd period.. Was a good spread of Sharks PP time. Then the stupid frustration penalties. Most of the calls on the Wings though later on were, as said during the Sharks broadcast of the ref calls against the Sharks earlier on, ticky tack. Edited February 26, 2009 by Shoreline Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slave 31 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 what were final penalties wings 6 sharks 7? pretty close Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DMAC 25 18 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 ok fine we'll give them that goal final score Detroit:4 San Jose:2 tough lose for them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Inultus 12 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 Please, I'm not even being a homer here but to say that the Wings get calls which enable them to win games is simply not true. I will admit last night I was very surprised that they didn't count that goal and that they the Sharks had so many penalties called. OTOH, we got severely screwed in the playoffs on penalties (Holmstrom's ass interference call comes to mind). Doesn't really matter, we still won, but what if a clear no-call that was called had changed the momentum of the series. Hell yeah we'd have a right to *****. And I can understand why a Sharks fan would complain about last night, but she is definitely dreaming when she says the Wings did not play better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CaliWingsNut Report post Posted February 26, 2009 I keep on telling you guys about the Secret Hockey Command and Control Bunker 50000 feet below Toronto where Gary Bettman, Colin Campbell, and Dan O'Halloran spend all day plotting against the wings while partaking of the service of the in house man-***** Cindy Crosby.... So that's the real name of lemieux's home? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RockyMountainWingGal 108 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 (edited) Who cares what some 16 year old kid says on their myspace? Is that what it's come down to discussing on this board? I've never looked for a Sharks' forum but if I want opinions from other teams' fans, I'd start there. Edited February 26, 2009 by RockyMountainWingGal Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
XxGoWingsxX 0 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 Please, I'm not even being a homer here but to say that the Wings get calls which enable them to win games is simply not true. I will admit last night I was very surprised that they didn't count that goal and that they the Sharks had so many penalties called. OTOH, we got severely screwed in the playoffs on penalties (Holmstrom's ass interference call comes to mind). Doesn't really matter, we still won, but what if a clear no-call that was called had changed the momentum of the series. Hell yeah we'd have a right to *****. And I can understand why a Sharks fan would complain about last night, but she is definitely dreaming when she says the Wings did not play better. Exactly, the wings brought their A game last night and I honestly think that Cleary's "dirty" (and lets not kid ourselves, it was a pretty bad hit) hit set a good tone for the game for us because the sharks throughout the game seemed to be retaliating for that one hit which helped us alot. After last night's game, I feel confident in saying that if the wings play even close to as good as they did last night....they will in fact go very deep in the playoffs. Now back to cleary's hit. In his defense, he seemed to just be finishing his check and just before he hit joe, joe turned and looked back so I'm inclined to believe that cleary thought thornton was going to turn toward him. I doubt cleary purposely laid that kind of hit on him. In fact, if you watch closely you'll see him try to pull off at the last second, and he even twisted his body and hit him with his back in an attempt to soften the blow when he realized joe wasn't going to turn around. As for Conklin, I say if the guy keeps up the rest of the season like that, we have to start him in the playoffs. That is unless ozzie comes back in tomorrow and shows everyone he is refocused and back to form of last season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
T.Low 1,011 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 From the sounds of her comments, she must be the daughter of the Sharks' color commentator (that bald whatsisname dude) that I had to endure on yayhoo sports last night. He is a whiney biased f***, and that must be where she gets it from. I really feal like Mickey is as objective as can be when it comes to calls and suspect goals etc. How many times have you heard Mickey say things like " Campbell; 2 minutes for playing hockey" acknowledging the bad call agaisnt Chicago or something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
XxGoWingsxX 0 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 T.Low, that is why I love wings broadcasts. Mickey tries to be as unbiased as possible. If detroit gets away with something, he'll admit it. If the refs make a bad call on the opposing team, he'll stick up for that team. He calls the game, not the team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zion 93 Report post Posted February 26, 2009 Correct. And Drew Remenda (the bald guy) is usually the same way. He has his homer Canadian moments, however, so I can picture him going berserk on the Thornton "attempt to injure" hit last night. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
soultrain 43 Report post Posted February 27, 2009 Who cares what some 16 year old kid says on their myspace? Is that what it's come down to discussing on this board? I've never looked for a Sharks' forum but if I want opinions from other teams' fans, I'd start there. just thought it was funny....ya *******. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest NumbaSixty-Six Report post Posted February 27, 2009 (edited) just thought it was funny....ya *******. Your the obnoxious *******. Thinking people care what you think is funny. Just kidding. Edited February 27, 2009 by NumbaSixty-Six Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drake_Marcus 890 Report post Posted February 27, 2009 I think that goal should of counted. the ref was enthusiastic that he saw the puck cross the line. wouldn't of mattered anyway There must be conclusive video evidence to overturn the ref's on-ice decision. Based on the views given- I have to agree with Toronto- there was never ice visible between the back of the puck and the line. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donfishmaster 62 Report post Posted February 27, 2009 So this 16 year old "fan of hockey" thinks she is the authortity on everything...she is really full of s***. i found this comment when i woke up this morning and thought it was amazing! "Fu*k you and your Red Wings!!! Shut up. It wasn't even the Red Wings playing that won them the game, it was the stupid refs and Toronto that did it! They did not play any better than the Sharks did. Did you watch the same game that I did? The Red Wings must be paying people off, they sure get special treatment. That's probably why they won the cup. Bunch of fu*king cheaters. We'll see you in the Western Conference Finals. You sure are a sore winner though. Calling those guys winners is a stretch."-Shark Asylum (Team Team)-myspace Ahhh...the ranting of a syphillitic *****-in-training. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Donaldjr2448 43 Report post Posted February 27, 2009 I can understand why a new fan of the NHL would think the Wings get special treatment, but we all know that our cycling and great passing and quick offensive movement is what leads to other teams drawing penalties against us. I think our speed alone is what helps us with getting calls, the Wings have benefitted more from the interference calls (hooking, and holding stuff) because of guys like Dats, Hossa, Z and so on and so on!! Just my 2 cents!! But yes, that girls rant is funny stuff!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RockyMountainWingGal 108 Report post Posted February 27, 2009 just thought it was funny....ya *******. So since you act like you are 16 yourself, i guess I can see why you read teenagers' myspace rants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
