• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
96warrior

Blackhawks sign Danny Bois

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

I genuinely fear Philadelphia and Toronto this year.

I see Chicago really trying to goon it up these 6 games. I see some crease-crashing craziness this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I genuinely fear Philadelphia and Toronto this year.

I see Chicago really trying to goon it up these 6 games. I see some crease-crashing craziness this year.

The Pens have more to worry about those two teams than we do ;) Finally the East is getting tougher.

Chicago is welcome to try and goon it up and crash the crease... I'd like to see Ericsson get more crease clearing experience in the NHL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest micah

Time will tell is Ericcson has what it takes to put big meanies in their place. He's certainly big enough, but he hasn't exactly demonstrated a "take no s***" attitude in the AHL. He's also never fought anyone tough to my knowledge. Paul Brown is the only fighter he ever tangled with, and Jonathan lost that one. granted, that was like 3 or 4 years ago, but still, don't get your hopes up that Ericcson is gonna be keeping the Eagers of the league in check. He's big, he's strong, and he'll go if he has to, but he is not a good fighter. He's pretty much Lilja - a guy who's effort you'll appreciate when he throws down, but he's not gonna be giving anyone nightmares.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Time will tell is Ericcson has what it takes to put big meanies in their place. He's certainly big enough, but he hasn't exactly demonstrated a "take no s***" attitude in the AHL. He's also never fought anyone tough to my knowledge. Paul Brown is the only fighter he ever tangled with, and Jonathan lost that one. granted, that was like 3 or 4 years ago, but still, don't get your hopes up that Ericcson is gonna be keeping the Eagers of the league in check. He's big, he's strong, and he'll go if he has to, but he is not a good fighter. He's pretty much Lilja - a guy who's effort you'll appreciate when he throws down, but he's not gonna be giving anyone nightmares.

I agree. Some people make Ericsson out to be the second coming of Bob Probert, after only seeing him ragdoll Perry. It's a far cry from Perry to some of the bigger, meaner forwards in the league. I'm not sure I even want him fighting that much - a. I don't want him to get injured, esp. after coming off of a wrist injury (see also what happened to Lilja); b. defensemen are too valuable to be guys who fight regularly (in terms of being short a defenseman for 5 minutes, while the other team probably loses a less valuable fourth line forward). There is a difference between him and Lilja not taking crap in the crease, and being relied upon to answer the bell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Problem is though he'll be the only one...Ericsson isn't exactly Probert, or Scott Stevens; nobody is afraid of him.

Of course not. The thing about Ericsson is he's got better uses for his hands than swinging them at people. He should be fighting in moderation. I'm thinking like 4 or 5 fights a year? I'm no expert on fighters, but those are more 'spot picking' type numbers, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I like how everytime a tough guy is signed, a thread instantly pops up on here containing the following things:

He would have fit in well here.

Why didn't we sign him?

Wake up Kenny!

This team is so soft.

Here's to missing the playoffs.

Sign Downey.

:ranting:

We need Moen, Grier or Betts.

Our goaltending sucks.

Everyone is getting better while we're getting worse.

actually it's more like 1 or 2 guys who will say something like that

and then 10+ douchebags will come in and mock them because they want to add toughness to our squad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just might beat the snot outta Kopecky this fall camp, and take his spot in the line-up.

Haha. Hawks sign Kopecky in order to attract Hossa, and once Hossa is under contract, they promptly demote Kopecky to the AHL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For your information, Talbot scored MORE GOALS and POINTS in finals than Crosby.

For your information, Talbot scored TWICE in game # 7.

Think about it again...

How about this. The Penguins were down 3-0 in game 6 to the Flyers and Talbot went out and took one for the team. I was watching this game live and the announcers mentioned a number of times afterwards that it was a motivator for the team and they in turn went on to win.

name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="
type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object> &">
name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="
type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object> &" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350" />

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For your information, Talbot scored MORE GOALS and POINTS in finals than Crosby.

For your information, Talbot scored TWICE in game # 7.

Think about it again...

Crosby was shadowed by the Wings best players.

Talbot was not.

You can say whatever you want about those two games (game seven in the SCF and game six of the quarterfinals), but at the end of the day it was Crosby who led his team as a captain and Malkin who led his team as a forward. Talbot was a great role player, but you are kidding yourself to think he was the sole reason the Penguins won the cup, or even the biggest reason.

But please, don't let me stop you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest micah

Talbot played a role somewhat similar to Ceary's (most of the time) this playoff go-round. He played better than anyone had a right to expect him to play, even while some of the star players around him were underperforming. I don't agree that Talbot or Cleary "led" their teams exactly, but both certainly set an example for the others on their respective teams, that this is the time to let it all hang out, to sweat blood, to give 100% on every single shift. I don't want to call that leading, but I don't know what else to call it.

Of course, Talbot gets major props from me for volunteering for the Carcillo beatdown. He didn't have to. He elected to because someone had to do something to spark the team, and all of his teamates were failing. He stepped up and reminded the team that "hey, some people care about this. Let's go." It worked. Props.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline
For your information, Talbot scored MORE GOALS and POINTS in finals than Crosby.

For your information, Talbot scored TWICE in game # 7.

Think about it again...

Well that does it, give the C to Talbot. The Pens would be nowhere without him. If he didn't score in the finals or Game 7 the Pens would have never even made the playoffs. :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Talbot played a role somewhat similar to Ceary's (most of the time) this playoff go-round. He played better than anyone had a right to expect him to play, even while some of the star players around him were underperforming. I don't agree that Talbot or Cleary "led" their teams exactly, but both certainly set an example for the others on their respective teams, that this is the time to let it all hang out, to sweat blood, to give 100% on every single shift. I don't want to call that leading, but I don't know what else to call it.

Of course, Talbot gets major props from me for volunteering for the Carcillo beatdown. He didn't have to. He elected to because someone had to do something to spark the team, and all of his teamates were failing. He stepped up and reminded the team that "hey, some people care about this. Let's go." It worked. Props.

Bingo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Crosby was shadowed by the Wings best players.

Talbot was not.

You can say whatever you want about those two games (game seven in the SCF and game six of the quarterfinals), but at the end of the day it was Crosby who led his team as a captain and Malkin who led his team as a forward. Talbot was a great role player, but you are kidding yourself to think he was the sole reason the Penguins won the cup, or even the biggest reason.

But please, don't let me stop you.

Some of posters should re-watch games # 6 and # 7.

You can clearly see that Pens played simple game, dumping puck and chasing Detroit defensemen’s who weren’t wiling to sacrifice their bodies; Rafalski, Kronwall, Stuart, Lebda and even Lidstrom didn’t wanted to play the puck because of Pen’s checking… That’s how you create TURNOVERS and that’s the main point why Detroit LOST.

When Pens started hitting shift after s*** Detroit defensemen it was OVER. That’s exactly what has Talbot done.

Go and see Don Cherry’s comments (after 1st period) of the game # 7… what he said and what he’s shown??? It was all about Talbot, Kennedy… Detroit had NO ANSWERS to their grinders and that’s it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this