GMRwings1983 8,803 Report post Posted August 4, 2009 Who's THAT!?! That's my ex-girlfriend. This uk_redwing somehow got a hold of some of her photos and is now trying to smear my good name all over LGW. Nice try, Brit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holiday 0 Report post Posted August 4, 2009 The difference between Malts and Homer is that Homer plays within the rules infront of the net and other defenceman try to stop him from doing so by intimidation. Maltby facewashes people, yaps and then acts like a coward. Homer takes his punishment and gets what any team should give him, its hockey. Maltby on the other hand really deserves a good pounding for his antics Maltby HAS fought back before. But what do you expect? He is an agitator. A damn good one at that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest micah Report post Posted August 4, 2009 Maltby HAS fought back before. But what do you expect? He is an agitator. A damn good one at that. Agitator and Fighter are not mutually exclusive terms. See Ian Lapperierre. Can you briefly discuss your favorite games of '08/'09 that Maltby's agitating influenced the outcome of? He might as well have been fighting every chance he got, at least that would have been entertaining. I've seen Maltby get a few 5 minute fighting penalties, but I've never really seen him do anything that I would call "fighting back". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
