sureWhyNot 19 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 I know there has been threads in the past on this, but each week things change so I figured why not. Anyways, here is my team. What do you think? What does your roster look like? FORWARDS: Patrick Kane - Paul Stasny - Zach Parise Phil Kessel - Tim Connolly - Bobby Ryan Jamie Langenbrunner - Ryan Kesler - James van Riemsdyk Dustin Brown - Scott Gomez - Ryan Malone DEFENSE: Brian Rafalski - Ryan Suter Erik Johnson - Alex Goligoski Ryan Whitney - Zach Bogosian GOALTENDERS: 1) Ryan Miller 2) Tim Thomas 3) Craig Anderson TAXI SQUAD: Ron Hainsey, Dustin Byfuglien, Kyle Okposo, David Booth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titanium2 867 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 With Burke in charge I sincerely doubt that Rafalski will be his #1 dman. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StormJH1 231 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 I think we're screwed. It's good to see us moving in the direction of younger and faster to compete with the European teams (and Canada), but out of the 21 players you listed above, if all of those players were Canadian, how many of them would make the Canadian team? I count two or three, maybe: Kane, Parise, and Rafalski. That's it. I also don't have faith in any of the U.S. goaltenders on that type of a stage (Thomas' Vezina was the product of a great defensive Bruins team...see Manny Fernandez's numbers from that year if you don't believe that) Plus, at the very time our team is getting smaller and faster, we're going to an Olympics in Vancouver played on NHL-SIZED rinks. In other words, if our one shot was to build a finesse team based on skating, hard work, and chemistry, we'll be playing a style of game totally different from past Olympics on international-sized rinks. So, our players could play more like they would in the NHL, and we don't have the best NHL players. But the tournaments are quick and crazy, and there's a lot of screwy stuff that goes on with referreeing, etc., so you never now. U-S-A! U-S-A! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shoreline Report post Posted November 23, 2009 I'm just hoping USA gets a friggen medal. Recent years in world competition the US teams have sucked. It's a nice line-up but I'm more interested in how they perform together. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
T-Ruff 47 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 My Team USA: Parise - Stastny - Kessel Ryan - Pavelski - Kane Brown [A] - Kesler - Malone Backes - Drury [C] - Byfuglien Suter - Martin Rafalski [A] - Komisarek Johnson - Orpik Miller Thomas taxi: Anderson, Whitney, JVR, Langenbrunner Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eva unit zero 271 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 Team USA: Parise/Kesler/Ryan Blake/Connolly/Kessel Brown/Gomez/Gionta Langenbrunner/Drury/Dubinsky Rafalski/Carle Goligoski/Greene Johnson/Suter Miller Anderson Taxi: Pavelski, Wheeler, Whitney, Thomas Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sureWhyNot 19 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 How are you leaving JVR outta the lineup? If in fact we are going into a year with an outside shot of medaling, don't you think it would be worthwhile to bring some younger guys up who will be part of Team USA for a while? Not to mention JVR is killing it in Philly. Also, I kept my lineup with guys playing their natural position. LW are playing LW, C are playing C and so on. With so little time to practice I think keeping guys at their natural positions could help. Miller is elite. Arguably the best goalie in hockey when healthy. Edge USA in goal tending. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sureWhyNot 19 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 Team USA: Parise/Kesler/Ryan Blake/Connolly/Kessel Brown/Gomez/Gionta Langenbrunner/Drury/Dubinsky Rafalski/Carle Goligoski/Greene Johnson/Suter Miller Anderson Taxi: Pavelski, Wheeler, Whitney, Thomas Ahh, I forgot about him in my lineup. Good pick for sure. I would definitely add Carle somewhere in my top 4 as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drake_Marcus 890 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 I'm just hoping USA gets a friggen medal. Recent years in world competition the US teams have sucked. It's a nice line-up but I'm more interested in how they perform together. Even if you don't get a medal in hockey you know you're coming home with the highest combined medal count for the games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drake_Marcus 890 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 How are you leaving JVR outta the lineup? If in fact we are going into a year with an outside shot of medaling, don't you think it would be worthwhile to bring some younger guys up who will be part of Team USA for a while? Not to mention JVR is killing it in Philly. Also, I kept my lineup with guys playing their natural position. LW are playing LW, C are playing C and so on. With so little time to practice I think keeping guys at their natural positions could help. Miller is elite. Arguably the best goalie in hockey when healthy. Edge USA in goal tending. I'd take a Brodeur/Luongo tandem over anyone else in the league. Brodeur is money. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Lidstromboli Report post Posted November 23, 2009 i think i'd rather have Modano as a 4th line center than Drury Brown/Gomez/Gionta gomez and gionta on a checking line? lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sureWhyNot 19 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 I actually think that we look OK. I am not saying we are going to medal for sure - that would be idiotic. But I do think that if a couple things go our way, we could end up surprising some people. This thing is a sprint, and if the right guys get hot at the right time - who knows, anything can happen. My predictions are: Gold: Canada Silver: Russia Bronze: Sweden Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sureWhyNot 19 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 i think i'd rather have Modano as a 4th line center than Drury gomez and gionta on a checking line? lol With the USA worried about matching offense I wouldn't be surprised at all to see Gomez or Gionta on the 4th line. Probably more Gomez the Gionta. Modano doesn't have a ice cubes chance in hell of making this team. And Drury shouldn't be on anything other then the taxi squad if that after his dismal pasy couple of years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sureWhyNot 19 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 eva unit zero you don't even have Stasny in your lineup? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Lidstromboli Report post Posted November 23, 2009 (edited) i agree Modano probably won't make it, but if there's one "vet" that could make the team i would want it to be him burke isn't going to put Gomez type of guys in the bottom six "The way I build my teams, you've seen my teams play. We go for high, high skill in the top six forwards and we go for hardhats on the bottom," Burke said. http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=389260 Edited November 23, 2009 by Lidstromboli Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,804 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 That's a very small lineup. Canada is going to have bigger and stronger forwards out there that can wear the U.S. down easily along the boards if the two teams should face each other. Also, the defense is really weak. To me, the U.S. lacks the overwhelming skill set that countries like Sweden, Russia or Canada can put out there on the ice. Oh and eva forgot Kane in his lineup. He's America's best player right now bar none. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MacK_Attack 108 Report post Posted November 23, 2009 Even if you don't get a medal in hockey you know you're coming home with the highest combined medal count for the games. I'd say Germany will win the most. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BeeRYCE 2 Report post Posted November 24, 2009 Surewhynot's roster looks very solid, and I think that's very close to the final roster they will announce. A lot of people pick Canada, Russia, Sweden over them in a heartbeat, but I truly think the USA is equal to Russia and Sweden, but not quite as good as Canada (not trying to be biased). It's going to be an entertaining Olympics that's for sure... Finland, Slovakia, and the Czechs might have good shots as well. But yeah, I like watching the American's play, it's a very uptempo transition style game with guys that can make magic in the offensive zone. Goalies will hang in there as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toby91_ca 620 Report post Posted November 24, 2009 How are you leaving JVR outta the lineup? Well, he wasn't even included in the summer roster....probably because he never played a game in the NHL at that point and he's only played 17 games so far in his NHL career, so while he's got a shot of he keeps it up, I think he's an outside shot at best. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eva unit zero 271 Report post Posted November 24, 2009 After some more time to actually put thought into it, I have made some modifications to my Team USA: Parise/Kesler/Ryan Blake/Connolly/Kessel Brown/Stastny/Gionta Langenbrunner/Drury/Rolston Rafalski/Carle Goligoski/Greene Johnson/Suter Miller Anderson Taxi: Dubinsky, Wheeler, Whitney, Thomas As far as Kane goes, I didn't forget him. I left him off intentionally because I don't want that little s*** representing my country. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Carman 387 Report post Posted November 24, 2009 Kane one of USA's few pure goalscorers... Glad you put personal bias over your country's Olympic success. Anyways, I can't wait for the Olympics. USA has a team that on paper shouldn't match up with Canada, but if Miller gets hot they can certainly contend and in a short series anything can happen. Should be very entertaining nonetheless, and seeing all this young talent is very promising for the future. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryMalredo 2 Report post Posted November 24, 2009 I can see the US compete for a medal. Canada and Sweden are the only two teams that are significantly better. Russia's been getting too much love. Sure, Ovechkin and Malkin might be the two most talented players in hockey and Kovalchuck and Datsyuk are no slouches either, but beyond that, I'm not impressed. And Canada and Sweden are certainly not invincible (Switzerland and Belarus anyone?) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eva unit zero 271 Report post Posted November 24, 2009 Kane one of USA's few pure goalscorers... Glad you put personal bias over your country's Olympic success. Anyways, I can't wait for the Olympics. USA has a team that on paper shouldn't match up with Canada, but if Miller gets hot they can certainly contend and in a short series anything can happen. Should be very entertaining nonetheless, and seeing all this young talent is very promising for the future. Kane is the USA's 3rd, maybe 4th best winger. His only skill is his shot, and he hasn't shown that he is a good enough player to make use of that shot without a playmaker or some kind of additional threat on his line. Same kind of criticisms Kessel was slammed with in his negotiations this summer, except the only 'attitude problem' comments you ever hear about Kessel are about the fact that he wanted in the kind of money a 40 goal RFA gets paid, and Boston couldn't pay it. Kane, OTOH, beat up a cabbie over $0.20 despite the fact he's a god damn millionaire and should be giving the cabbie a $20 tip. So no thanks to a selfish child who is a defensive liability and whose contributions can be replaced by players who fit better as part of a, get this, TEAM. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Carman 387 Report post Posted November 24, 2009 Kane is a very good teammate on the ice and is one of the most offensively gifted players currently in the NHL not to mention from the USA, nice to see a random fan that has never played with him and is only judging him by a random teenage drunken mistake. There are people in the NHL that have done much worse things then an altercation. I'm not defending what he did, it was stupid but keeping him off the Olympic team for it? Man you must be quite the disciplinarian. Kane has always been a jackass and a general premaddona. But he is a hell of a hockey player and fills a very important and needed role on the US Olympic team. Then again I'm probably biased for having a personal connections, I just cannot fathom not having him on the team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BeeRYCE 2 Report post Posted November 24, 2009 Kane is the second best American player in the NHL only behind Parise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites