syntax 359 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Flip going for tripping. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperNovaXll 124 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 My god, we look like a totally different team with Dats out there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anijuice 93 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Refs gave us one there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
luvpucks 7 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Refs gave us one there Of course! Even the refs can't hate Datsyuk Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jusek 437 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Nice period. I hate that April in the D so much... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
P. Marlowe 748 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 It's not just that Datsyuk plays great, but opposing D has to concentrate on him so much that the space left makes every other forward more dangerous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperNovaXll 124 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Oh my..... I think thats the worst April in the D song yet.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
P. Marlowe 748 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Refs gave us one there What do you mean? Was Three-or-Four interfered with? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcom007 1,465 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 I love Pavel Datsyuk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wings_fanatic 677 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 I think he means on the call that led to the 4 on 4... interference on Eaves... if that was called on the Wings I would have been pretty pissed too. Great period by the Wings though... and that is without Kronners and Modano. This game tells me that Babs needs to keep this top line together I don't think there is any opposing line in the league that can contain a line of Z- Pavs- Cleary. Also, nice to see Pavs score in his game back (I am almsot 100% sure he deflected that shot) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperNovaXll 124 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 ...I just know im going to get that april in the D song stuck in my head... ...I;m probably going to hang myself by the end of the month Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
P. Marlowe 748 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 I think he means on the call that led to the 4 on 4... interference on Eaves... Ah, yes. That was a bit questionable. Ericsson was on the ice more than any other Wing. It seems that instead of punishing him for shaky play Babcock tries to get him going. That's not a dumb move at all. I hope that the similarities between the D song and this Nick Cave tune are just coincidences: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
syntax 359 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Multiple interference calls on the Wild let go there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jasper84 333 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 I'll be surprised if thats not in, the way they were banging at Howard Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anijuice 93 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 What do you mean? Was Three-or-Four interfered with? Meant the Wild penalty called that preceded. Looked like a weak one to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperNovaXll 124 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Ah s***.... thats a goal Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
syntax 359 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Looks like BS, which means it'll probably be a goal. Bad call on no whistle when it was under JImmy's arm for a few seconds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Esquire 324 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 lol. wut? 1 CanadaBoy reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Howard He Do It?! Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Like the ref saw the puck the entire time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Rafalski f***ed that up pretty good.. bad turnover. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WingZNut13 99 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 (edited) Ummm that was bulls*** Where was the intent to blow the whistle there? Goal was good after they showed the replay. Everyone can unwad their thongs now. Edited April 3, 2011 by WingZNut13 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yzermania 156 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 whistle should of blown, it was under howard for at least a couple seconds before it got knocked loose and in. Oh well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 Ummm that was bulls*** Where was the intent to blow the whistle there? No kidding. The puck was underneath Jimmy for several seconds. But they somehow thought it was in play or never lost sight of it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jasper84 333 Report post Posted April 3, 2011 (edited) The puck was loose between his arm and his leg the whole time, and the ref was right on top of it. He'd have to be blind not to see that puck. It was a good goal. Edited April 3, 2011 by Jasper84 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
