I find it quite amusing that we have so many experts on this forum that think they are so much better at evaluating talent and player potential than either Holland or Babcock. If Ericsson was as bad as some of you idiots say he wouldn't be playing for most teams and yet one of the best teams in the league can't seem to find enough short comings in his game to sit his ass on the bench.
Duh! The purpose of this forum is only to agree with Holland and Babcock. Any independent thought is highly discouraged.
I must say, I've seen a dramatic improvement in Ericsson the last few months. He's getting more physical without being stupid and is making less mistakes. If he keeps this up I might start finding him acceptable.
I'm at the hospital (my wife just cranked out our second kid) and they have FS-D, but they of course didn't have FS-D+ (Monday's game) nor do they have this "National Broadcast Company Sports Network" for tonight's game. All in all this kid has cost me two hockey games. On top of that, it will be at least a good 12 years before he can mount any kind of respectable competition in NHL games on the PlayStation.
This leaves to F5ing it on the NHL homepage as I stare at Crosby headlines while laying on a f*cking pullout chair with the worlds s***tiest mattress.
But, the good news is that it's a healthy boy, but my wife wouldn't let me name him Tomas...