WingsDC2B 0 Report post Posted January 2, 2006 One of those friend of a friend instances informed me that the wings are looking into trading for Dwayne Roloson. Not to sure who they are asking for nor any other terms... just that the wings are looking into it. Personaly, I don't like it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rice 42 Report post Posted January 2, 2006 I doubt it. Roloson is not significantly better than either of our goalies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EstonianWingsFan#1 0 Report post Posted January 2, 2006 Instead of Roloson, I'd like to get Rolston. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barnes52 0 Report post Posted January 2, 2006 He's not an upgrade over what we have now. Why can't Holland go after some defensemen? But what all these rumors are saying is where there's smoke, there's fire. It's clear Wings brass is not sold on either goalie taking us to the promised land. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RyanBarnes! 293 Report post Posted January 2, 2006 He's not an upgrade over what we have now. Why can't Holland go after some defensemen? But what all these rumors are saying is where there's smoke, there's fire. It's clear Wings brass is not sold on either goalie taking us to the promised land. For once, I don't blame them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seth 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2006 Instead of Roloson, I'd like to get Rolston. oh man Im with ya there. Roloson is not what we need. Osgood has played decent when needed, Legace is coming back. What I'm waiting for is a trade for is 1 Grit Dman who can put points up, 1 2nd-3rd line power forward in the making. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
betterREDthandead 58 Report post Posted January 3, 2006 He's not an upgrade over what we have now. Why can't Holland go after some defensemen? But what all these rumors are saying is where there's smoke, there's fire. It's clear Wings brass is not sold on either goalie taking us to the promised land. That's clear. What isn't clear is why Roloson would be any better? His stats are largely a product of the Wild's system. Would anybody here - anyone at all - think Legace for Roloson or Osgood for Roloson is an upgrade? My guess is it's probably just a case of the Wings covering all bases. Probably not looking into it, but looking into looking into it, if that's clear. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RyanBarnes! 293 Report post Posted January 3, 2006 That's clear. What isn't clear is why Roloson would be any better? His stats are largely a product of the Wild's system. Would anybody here - anyone at all - think Legace for Roloson or Osgood for Roloson is an upgrade? My guess is it's probably just a case of the Wings covering all bases. Probably not looking into it, but looking into looking into it, if that's clear. I don't trust Osgood. I'd consider Osgood for Roloson an upgrade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PRStoetzer 1 Report post Posted January 3, 2006 These goalie trade rumors have been going on since late in the summer. Obviously the Wings do not trust Legace and Osgood to get the job done. Are the goalies aware of these rumors? If so, is it helping or hurting their play? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreadthered 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2006 I would rather grab Fernandez if any goalie from Mini atkaest he ahs some potential Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redwings1914 18 Report post Posted January 5, 2006 Are you sure your friend just didnt say this because of his performance last night? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BeeRYCE 2 Report post Posted January 5, 2006 (edited) Probably not considering he leads all goalies in save % and GAA. Edited January 5, 2006 by BeeRYCE Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WingsDC2B 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2006 Are you sure your friend just didnt say this because of his performance last night? I doubt it... especially since I posted that original comment about 24 hours before he beat us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RyanBarnes! 293 Report post Posted January 5, 2006 I would rather grab Fernandez if any goalie from Mini atkaest he ahs some potential Pass on Fernandez. His stats are good right now, but he's not solid enough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fatcat6 0 Report post Posted January 15, 2006 We have damn good scouts, so I'd someone who's young, and has a lot of potential to stay here in Detroit for quite a while, and carry this team far. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EstonianWingsFan#1 0 Report post Posted January 23, 2006 When Roloson was playing in Finland during the lockout, I remember he was a totally different class in the league. He made like 35 - 40 saves most nights and stats were great. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RyanBarnes! 293 Report post Posted January 23, 2006 ok.....what?! the guy's been more solid than every single goalie in the league, consistently, save for maybe hasek. he's kept minnesota in alot of games. I strongly suspect that his stats look better than he actually is. A benefit of playing for the defensive minded Wild. I could be wrong though. I'd prefer Roloson. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fatcat6 0 Report post Posted January 25, 2006 I'd rather not have Roloson, because he's never really impressed me. I think that would be a mistake to acquire him. Keep Legace and Osgood for now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
