Detroit # 1 Fan 2,204 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 Filppula. Honestly , Calder-Filpula-Hudler/Cleary would be a pretty good line Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kp-Wings 3 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 I realize he is lazy but I don't understand what happend. He wasn't like that in washington. He just bam became lazy just like that Actually, I think he was like that in Washington. His point totals were so good because he was playing with guys like Jagr, Bondra, Nylander, Gonchar, etc. No offense to Calder and Hudler, but there is a production difference in these players. When Lang played with all those superstar players, he scored points mostly based off of their play, or something like that. I guess just playing with all-star talent just made him look good. What I'm basically implying here is that Lang is not a very good player, and we can all see that. He takes lazy penalties, and has been amid in scoring slumps all year. If he doesn't want to work, than tough s*** is all I have to say. It really frustrates me watching him anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockey13Playa 240 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 I think Datsyuk will stay, and getting rid of Lang will held fund the Datsyuk deal. Datsyuk will come around this year in the playoffs. I believe we will be looking for a new goalie, and a couple guys on defense. Osgood and hasek are old news. Same as lilja. You're crazy if you think Hasek and Osgood are both going. Sorry to break the news to you but as long as Hasek doesn't retire, he will play for the wings next year. As for Osgood he has another year on his contract. Actually, I think he was like that in Washington. His point totals were so good because he was playing with guys like Jagr, Bondra, Nylander, Gonchar, etc. No offense to Calder and Hudler, but there is a production difference in these players. When Lang played with all those superstar players, he scored points mostly based off of their play, or something like that. I guess just playing with all-star talent just made him look good. What I'm basically implying here is that Lang is not a very good player, and we can all see that. He takes lazy penalties, and has been amid in scoring slumps all year. If he doesn't want to work, than tough s*** is all I have to say. It really frustrates me watching him anymore. Yeah now that yo usay it, I guess that is true. I never really payed attention to who he played with for the Caps, and that does make a difference. I guess he was overrated then when we looked at him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LSSU Hockey 0 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 Briere Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingslogo19 281 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 Briere I would love to see Briere in a Wings jersey, i just don't see the Sabres not re-signing him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kylee 727 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 I would love to see Briere in a Wings jersey, i just don't see the Sabres not re-signing him that would be amazing. (but i love langer) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingslogo19 281 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 that would be amazing. (but i love langer) But i know you'd take Briere over Langer right if we had the choice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ozzie30 170 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 The cap is projected to go up 4-5 mil next season, that's plenty of room to re-sign datsyuk and put a nice down payment on Bert. Once lang is gone, the wings will be working with 8-9mil to sign bert and calder, and give dats, markov, and schneider raises. Can that be done? So the concensus is promote from within? Flipper is good, but can he anchor our second line at this point? I have my doubts, but if you follow the money, that may be their only option....I was actually getting excited about the possibility of gomez. (or briere) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eva unit zero 271 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 Actually, I think he was like that in Washington. His point totals were so good because he was playing with guys like Jagr, Bondra, Nylander, Gonchar, etc. Lang was outscoring all those guys. Lang's big year in Washington happened to be one of Jagr's WORST, and Jagr was traded before Lang was. The reason Lang was putting up gaudy point totals has nothing to do with being less lazy. it's the fact he was playing 25 minutes a night every night. It's like Fedorov's 120 point season. People were upset he never replicated that, when his 83 point campain in 02-03 was actually a comparable scoring rate per minute played. It's had to keep up your scoring pace playing 20 minutes when you scored 120 playing 28 minutes a night. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 The Lang money should be spent on a scoring winger. Even if the Wings resign Bertuzzi and Calder, they'll still need 1 scoring winger, and a physical stay-at-home defencemen. Flip and Rex will be fine playing up the middle, either could play on the second line. They need capable wingers. And re-sign Pavel, and Todd, Markov, and maybe Calder. It would look like this: Zetterberg - Datsyuk - Bertuzzi UFA Scoring Winger - Hudler - Franzen Filpulla - Draper - Grigorenko/Calder Kopecky - Cleary - Holmstrom Sammuelson Lidstrom - Markov Sarich - Kronwall Chelios - Lebda Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eva unit zero 271 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 The Lang money should be spent on a scoring winger. Even if the Wings resign Bertuzzi and Calder, they'll still need 1 scoring winger, and a physical stay-at-home defencemen. Flip and Rex will be fine playing up the middle, either could play on the second line. They need capable wingers. And re-sign Pavel, and Todd, Markov, and maybe Calder. It would look like this: Zetterberg - Datsyuk - Bertuzzi UFA Scoring Winger - Hudler - Franzen Filpulla - Draper - Grigorenko/Calder Kopecky - Cleary - Holmstrom Sammuelson Lidstrom - Markov Sarich - Kronwall Chelios - Lebda This roster, before considering the UFA scoring winger or goaltenders, already would cost around 44 million. Goaltenders push that to 46 million. That leaves a million--minus any bonuses that carry over--to spend on your top six winger. More likely is that Grigorenko goes to the AHL, and the other twelve forwards you mentioned are the regulars, and we either sign or call up a 13th forward like Ellis. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kp-Wings 3 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 Lang was outscoring all those guys. Lang's big year in Washington happened to be one of Jagr's WORST, and Jagr was traded before Lang was. The reason Lang was putting up gaudy point totals has nothing to do with being less lazy. it's the fact he was playing 25 minutes a night every night. It's like Fedorov's 120 point season. People were upset he never replicated that, when his 83 point campain in 02-03 was actually a comparable scoring rate per minute played. It's had to keep up your scoring pace playing 20 minutes when you scored 120 playing 28 minutes a night. So you think that if Lang played more minutes he'd score more? Sorry, I just don't see that happening. He's been horrible all year long on the second line. And doesn't the second line average about 20 minutes a night anyways? I'm sorry, but I feel Lang is really overrated. He shows no effort when he plays at all, and acts like he doesn't want to be here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eva unit zero 271 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 So you think that if Lang played more minutes he'd score more? Sorry, I just don't see that happening. He's been horrible all year long on the second line. And doesn't the second line average about 20 minutes a night anyways? I'm sorry, but I feel Lang is really overrated. He shows no effort when he plays at all, and acts like he doesn't want to be here. Lang was the team's best forward at the beginning of the season, and when he was playing with Hudler he was scoring plenty. His failures this season have to do with the fact he has been on a line with Cleary and Williams all year. Cleary's scoring ups and downs are direct RESULTS of how Lang was playing. If Lang was hot, Cleary was along for the ride. If Lang slumped, Cleary couldn't score. Lang has been no different this year than any other year of his career--he's always been streaky like that. It's just being noticed more this year because he's in the final year of his contract, as is Dats, and people have been trying to size up whether keeping Lang for about 3m might be a good alternative to paying Dats 6-7m. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 This roster, before considering the UFA scoring winger or goaltenders, already would cost around 44 million. Goaltenders push that to 46 million. That leaves a million--minus any bonuses that carry over--to spend on your top six winger. More likely is that Grigorenko goes to the AHL, and the other twelve forwards you mentioned are the regulars, and we either sign or call up a 13th forward like Ellis. OK. As long as they get a guy like Sarich, and let Lang walk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheLegend19 1 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 I have a question. How do we KNOW that Lang will leave. How do we know that we will not re-sign him? Has The Red Wing organization, or Robert Lang said this? Because it seems like common knowledge around the boards. Depending on what happens in the playoffs, I think anything could happen. Finally, someone makes this thread worth replying in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zion 93 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 I'd love to see Huds and Flip promoted and Lang's salary used to resign Datsyuk, Bertuzzi and Calder. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bellarina 1 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 Dats will resign Let Lang go Resign Bert Just my opinion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OsGOD 3 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 This is the best April fools joke thread hands down. I heard the same thing laster year at this time about last year being Ozzies last year in the red and white and Manny was going to remain #1. Lang will be back... our playoff success for years to come depends on it! I will wait until we let him go for sure before I say, he definitely will be gone. People have a HUGE tendancey to incorrectly jump the gun on these boards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
glasgowcelticwing 18 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 Save our money and promote Filppula. Do you really think he needs another year of 11 minutes of ice time? I agree why go bring in a big name player when you've got a class act ready and waiting, the money would probably be better spent elsewhere. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redwingfan19 293 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 we have enough Centres already. We need and enforcer that can play, a rugged stay at home d man and another big winger or 2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heaton 1 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 No one. The Wings aren't going to have 3 #1 centers on the same team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heroes of Hockeytown 694 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 Lang was the team's best forward at the beginning of the season, and when he was playing with Hudler he was scoring plenty. He and Hudler tore it up off the bat, but now he's slumping again. This has just been a down year for him. He was awesome last year, he put up 60 points as the third line center, but this year, even after being promoted to second line duties, his totals have suffered big time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eva unit zero 271 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 He and Hudler tore it up off the bat, but now he's slumping again. This has just been a down year for him. He was awesome last year, he put up 60 points as the third line center, but this year, even after being promoted to second line duties, his totals have suffered big time. Just for reference, Lang is only seeing about 30 seconds more ice time this season than he did last season. And that is with seeing about 1:15 more at ES--which means a 45 second REDUCTION in PP time. Also, consider this--his linemates most of last year were Williams and Yzerman. His linemates most of this year were Williams and Cleary. I wouldn't say Cleary this year has been a better player offensively than Yzerman was last year. So basically Lang is playing on a comparable line with comparable time, but is seeing less PP time and is playing against better defensive pairings more often. Think about it for a second--add two thirds of Lang's points to reflect the amount of ice he was getting in Washington, and he's an 80 point player this season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heaton 1 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 Except it doesn't work that way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heroes of Hockeytown 694 Report post Posted April 2, 2007 Also, consider this--his linemates most of last year were Williams and Yzerman. His linemates most of this year were Williams and Cleary. I wouldn't say Cleary this year has been a better player offensively than Yzerman was last year. So basically Lang is playing on a comparable line with comparable time, but is seeing less PP time and is playing against better defensive pairings more often. Fair enough, less PP time and all that. I think Cleary was marginally better than Steve was last year offensively, but you also need to take into account that he's been with Hudler and Calder for the last ~15 games and was as up-and-down then as he's been all season. Those are far and away superior linemates, but the pattern is the same. Think about it for a second--add two thirds of Lang's points to reflect the amount of ice he was getting in Washington, and he's an 80 point player this season. Diminishing returns, anyone? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites