RedLionWings 0 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 well, lets just face it, the NHL wants the Pens to win it all, anything they can do to help that cause they will. They want Sid to be the poster boy of the league, and blah blah blah blah Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanZ 0 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 these refs are pieces of crap... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingsgirl001 983 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Man, I'm glad I don't have to work tomorrow XD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lomekian 201 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 At least TSN have covered that exactly correctly..blatant goal, ref called because he was looking for it and the league has no excuse to not use video refs on such a call. Can't argue....it is interesting how so many major sports are fighting off the use of video evidence when stop start sports like NFL and free flowing sports like Rugby have proved that if done correctly it improves the game...... Maybe the powers that be at NHL and FIfa etc are worried that it would limit their capacity fo rbias and corruption.? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stan Leycup X 0 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 I just wanna say this in the most nicest manner possible.... ENOUGH WITH THE SAMMMY BASHING, ITS f***IN OLD Sincerly, Superman 54 we're losing this game because of Robert Lang, somehow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Detroit # 1 Fan 2,204 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 I want to win this game, just to prove to everyone in the hockeyworld that not even the full Stars team plus officials can beat us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wings_Toledo 233 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Guys, I've figured out the problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vincanni 1 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Screw it, it's just one goal, we outplayed them in the 2nd and I feel it'll only continue more so in the third. We'll win even with the refs obviously trying to draw out the series. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DeuxEx 0 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 It's kind of hard for me to explain to non hockey fans here why Holmstroms goal was called off and then have them watch Dallas score from inside the crease. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,794 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 The refs should give us a PP the rest of the period until we score 2 goals to go up 2-1. Then they can go back to calling the game fairly again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Datsyukian Geek 2 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 ALRIGHT, things are the opposite of how they should be, so I'm changing up my tactics. I've been silent on here during the games and it worked since game 3 VS Colorado. This upcoming 4rd is an irregularity. SO HERE I AM, GO WINGS GO!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redwingsgirl 0 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Guys, I've figured out the problem. ha ha ha - love that one! Nicely done Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Superman54 91 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 sammy sucks I know, doesnt he?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nev 1,085 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Well, on the plus side there were 3 golden chances to score in that period (puck through the crease, Cleary on post, Flip 1on1), plus the one we got taken away. Wings are gunna bring it ALL in the 3rd. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
McCartyFanForLife 17 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Can someone who actualley is an NHL expert tell me why those disallowed goals are not ******* reviewable? Second, what the hell is the point in even having a crease if you can get called for interfence without even being in the crease? Same reason that a hooking call can't be reviewed, or a boarding call; it's a judgement call by the ref. To your question... I am not sure Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
datsyukismyfriend 4 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 I know, doesnt he?! yes, indeed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Seedless 0 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Give it up for Dallas Dan O'halleran! :flamingmad: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stan Leycup X 0 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 kjbabcjiegfesajcbasciub please someone explain this "4rd" thing to me because it's driving me crazy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AusWing13 0 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Man, I'm glad I don't have to work tomorrow XD Man, i'm watching this bulls*** AT work. Bogus calls are not good for productivity or employee morale! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CAWingsfan25 0 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Do you hear those puds on VS talking about that goal? "It wasn't pretty, but is was effective". Um, are you EFFIN kidding me? How about, " It wasn't pretty and, IT WASN'T LEGAL" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
T-Ruff 47 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 I don't understand why they can't review the Holmstrom play.... we have video replays for a reason, to get calls right.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reilly 24 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Osgood hasen't been great on his rebounds tonight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vincanni 1 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Here's hoping Dan O'Halloran just signed himself a one way ticket out of officiating the SCF for that obvious error. Then again I'm amazed he's still reffing at all so he'll likely get the nod for being in the SCF because I'm certain he has to have some sort of Bettman ransom arrangement going on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seeinred 1,488 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 Start of the 4rd. Let's f***in' rage, Red Wings. Send these pieces of garbage home and leave everybody amazed at what you can overcome. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edicius 3,269 Report post Posted May 15, 2008 4rd about to begin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
