• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
edicius

Burke defies Bettman, accuses Lowe of tampering

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

From next week's news (no link as it hasn't happened yet):

Bettman Fines Lowe for Comments

Commissioner Gary Bettman fined the Oilers' Lowe today. The amount of the fine has not yet been disclosed, and inside sources refused to comment.

This is the latest in a series of events which began with Brian "why's that camera off?" Burke accusing Lowe of offering offer sheets to players whose value was of less to Burke than to Lowe. After a year, Lowe commented. Commissioner Bettman told Burke and Lowe that no further comments would be allowed. Burke responded to comments which Lowe had made before the comment ban.

Yesterday, a reported asked Lowe for a comment, to which Lowe replied, "I have no comment." Bettman levied the fine immediately.

"You see," explained Bettman, "Lowe commented when he said he had no comment. That was a comment, and so he was fined. Burke did not comment, he responded. I think that is fine, so there was no fine. Had he commented, rather than responding, that would not have been fine, and he'd have been fined. Should Burke comment on the fine, that is not fine, and there will certainly be a fine, on which I will comment at that time. Lowe should have told the reporter that he had no response, which would have been the responsible thing to do, and that would have been fine, although I may have fined him anyway, as I am responsible for both comments and fines, which is fine; and I have no further comment."

Tune in next week to "As the Puck Turns". Let's play some hockey.

(In case anyone was wondering, I made that up.)

:clap: Amazing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From next week's news (no link as it hasn't happened yet):

Bettman Fines Lowe for Comments

Commissioner Gary Bettman fined the Oilers' Lowe today. The amount of the fine has not yet been disclosed, and inside sources refused to comment.

This is the latest in a series of events which began with Brian "why's that camera off?" Burke accusing Lowe of offering offer sheets to players whose value was of less to Burke than to Lowe. After a year, Lowe commented. Commissioner Bettman told Burke and Lowe that no further comments would be allowed. Burke responded to comments which Lowe had made before the comment ban.

Yesterday, a reported asked Lowe for a comment, to which Lowe replied, "I have no comment." Bettman levied the fine immediately.

"You see," explained Bettman, "Lowe commented when he said he had no comment. That was a comment, and so he was fined. Burke did not comment, he responded. I think that is fine, so there was no fine. Had he commented, rather than responding, that would not have been fine, and he'd have been fined. Should Burke comment on the fine, that is not fine, and there will certainly be a fine, on which I will comment at that time. Lowe should have told the reporter that he had no response, which would have been the responsible thing to do, and that would have been fine, although I may have fined him anyway, as I am responsible for both comments and fines, which is fine; and I have no further comment."

Tune in next week to "As the Puck Turns". Let's play some hockey.

(In case anyone was wondering, I made that up.)

Dude, that is better than Who's on First LMAO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From next week's news (no link as it hasn't happened yet):

Bettman Fines Lowe for Comments

Commissioner Gary Bettman fined the Oilers' Lowe today. The amount of the fine has not yet been disclosed, and inside sources refused to comment.

This is the latest in a series of events which began with Brian "why's that camera off?" Burke accusing Lowe of offering offer sheets to players whose value was of less to Burke than to Lowe. After a year, Lowe commented. Commissioner Bettman told Burke and Lowe that no further comments would be allowed. Burke responded to comments which Lowe had made before the comment ban.

Yesterday, a reported asked Lowe for a comment, to which Lowe replied, "I have no comment." Bettman levied the fine immediately.

"You see," explained Bettman, "Lowe commented when he said he had no comment. That was a comment, and so he was fined. Burke did not comment, he responded. I think that is fine, so there was no fine. Had he commented, rather than responding, that would not have been fine, and he'd have been fined. Should Burke comment on the fine, that is not fine, and there will certainly be a fine, on which I will comment at that time. Lowe should have told the reporter that he had no response, which would have been the responsible thing to do, and that would have been fine, although I may have fined him anyway, as I am responsible for both comments and fines, which is fine; and I have no further comment."

Tune in next week to "As the Puck Turns". Let's play some hockey.

(In case anyone was wondering, I made that up.)

lol, wow. I feel like I just listened to a monty python skit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Grown men acting like children. ridiculous.

Single biggest problem with the management level of the NHL. Well that and it's run like a family business with cousins that hate each other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From next week's news (no link as it hasn't happened yet):

Bettman Fines Lowe for Comments

Commissioner Gary Bettman fined the Oilers' Lowe today. The amount of the fine has not yet been disclosed, and inside sources refused to comment.

This is the latest in a series of events which began with Brian "why's that camera off?" Burke accusing Lowe of offering offer sheets to players whose value was of less to Burke than to Lowe. After a year, Lowe commented. Commissioner Bettman told Burke and Lowe that no further comments would be allowed. Burke responded to comments which Lowe had made before the comment ban.

Yesterday, a reported asked Lowe for a comment, to which Lowe replied, "I have no comment." Bettman levied the fine immediately.

"You see," explained Bettman, "Lowe commented when he said he had no comment. That was a comment, and so he was fined. Burke did not comment, he responded. I think that is fine, so there was no fine. Had he commented, rather than responding, that would not have been fine, and he'd have been fined. Should Burke comment on the fine, that is not fine, and there will certainly be a fine, on which I will comment at that time. Lowe should have told the reporter that he had no response, which would have been the responsible thing to do, and that would have been fine, although I may have fined him anyway, as I am responsible for both comments and fines, which is fine; and I have no further comment."

Tune in next week to "As the Puck Turns". Let's play some hockey.

(In case anyone was wondering, I made that up.)

Your second best post ever next to your American Pie parody. :lol::clap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Burke, but all of this baby bulls*** is just making him look like a joke. I honestly hope they find something about the Niedermayer signing, like a verbal agreement between the 2 before Scott was a FA or something along those lines. Just because of how much respect I've lost for both of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From next week's news (no link as it hasn't happened yet):

Bettman Fines Lowe for Comments

Commissioner Gary Bettman fined the Oilers' Lowe today. The amount of the fine has not yet been disclosed, and inside sources refused to comment.

This is the latest in a series of events which began with Brian "why's that camera off?" Burke accusing Lowe of offering offer sheets to players whose value was of less to Burke than to Lowe. After a year, Lowe commented. Commissioner Bettman told Burke and Lowe that no further comments would be allowed. Burke responded to comments which Lowe had made before the comment ban.

Yesterday, a reported asked Lowe for a comment, to which Lowe replied, "I have no comment." Bettman levied the fine immediately.

"You see," explained Bettman, "Lowe commented when he said he had no comment. That was a comment, and so he was fined. Burke did not comment, he responded. I think that is fine, so there was no fine. Had he commented, rather than responding, that would not have been fine, and he'd have been fined. Should Burke comment on the fine, that is not fine, and there will certainly be a fine, on which I will comment at that time. Lowe should have told the reporter that he had no response, which would have been the responsible thing to do, and that would have been fine, although I may have fined him anyway, as I am responsible for both comments and fines, which is fine; and I have no further comment."

Tune in next week to "As the Puck Turns". Let's play some hockey.

(In case anyone was wondering, I made that up.)

Now all we need to figure out is what a comment is, and what a response is. I am responding to your original comment here. But I am also commenting myself. God this is all so confusing!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From next week's news (no link as it hasn't happened yet):

Bettman Fines Lowe for Comments

Commissioner Gary Bettman fined the Oilers' Lowe today. The amount of the fine has not yet been disclosed, and inside sources refused to comment.

This is the latest in a series of events which began with Brian "why's that camera off?" Burke accusing Lowe of offering offer sheets to players whose value was of less to Burke than to Lowe. After a year, Lowe commented. Commissioner Bettman told Burke and Lowe that no further comments would be allowed. Burke responded to comments which Lowe had made before the comment ban.

Yesterday, a reporter asked Lowe for a comment, to which Lowe replied, "I have no comment." Bettman levied the fine immediately.

"You see," explained Bettman, "Lowe commented when he said he had no comment. That was a comment, and so he was fined. Burke did not comment, he responded. I think that is fine, so there was no fine. Had he commented, rather than responding, that would not have been fine, and he'd have been fined. Should Burke comment on the fine, that is not fine, and there will certainly be a fine, on which I will comment at that time. Lowe should have told the reporter that he had no response, which would have been the responsible thing to do, and that would have been fine, although I may have fined him anyway, as I am responsible for both comments and fines, which is fine; and I have no further comment."

Tune in next week to "As the Puck Turns". Let's play some hockey.

(In case anyone was wondering, I made that up.)

hahah i like it :thumbup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Duck Guy,

Are you ready to renounce Anaheim yet in favor of the Wings? You know you want to! :)

sorry ducks will always be first and wings second with me no matter what :ph34r::hehe:

Edited by Duck Guy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this