ami

Yeah it's a bit off, I'd say... you also missed that I love Tortorella. Where does this statement put me on your chart? :))

LMAO You assume way too much. take it easy.

Obviously, you don't. Cause I didn't mean hate at all. I was talking about 'who would cause less nausea and vomiting, winning the Stanley this coming June?' precisely. Nausea and hate are quite different, would you agree? We won't. First, I think even if we'd drop to the very bottom. we'd have no chance getting first draft ever while Buttman is in the office. Second, our luck had vanished completely when we heard two old-timers are coming back next season. No dahlin-shmalin or both of them can save us. And these two old-timers are derivatives, immaterial; the organization needs to change; ownership doesn't care about Red Wings anymore, they don't give a f-u-ck.

It's inevitable. Somebody will win Stanley this year, and it won't be the Red Wings. We will learn a new champion soon enough. I wish I could install uOrigin or update my /etc/hosts and block that knowledge forever. Unfortunately, there's no such blocker, yet. For the second time in about 27 years, the question (for me) is: who would cause less nausea and vomiting, winning the Stanley this coming June? In order from 'Definite NO, GOD, NO' to 'Ok, it's better then others': * Cindy and his landlord. Disaster, I doubt believe I can survive it. * Tampons. No Cup for the Captain outside of Detroit. * Capitals. No Cup for Ovechkin ever. Go phuck yourself you piece of sh-i-t! * Boston. Obvious. * Guppies. No Cup for other pieces of the same sh-i-t, both Joes. * Toronto. I already worry about Babs shorten vacation. Let him go to his nice lake house rather sooner. Boo to you Shanny, too! * Minnesota. You've chosen wrongly, sisters. * Quacks. Same as Boston. * Dives. Same as quacks. The rest - I don't care. The less damage would be if Jackets win it, just for Tart - love this guy, but after game last night, it's obvious they don't have a chance.

methhead or not, i wish we have a couple of guys with same grit, it'd ecstatic if our new Robert Lang had just a little of that quality too.

life is good. mrazek chased, svech scored, idiot commentators screamed like 19-years old Sharapova. Entertainment all around.

carey price(less)? what? :)) and that role model thing.... man... another example how unions are outdated, for half a century at least.

but why do you believe that "Give us elite players and there is no reason why things won't turn around."?

what exactly makes you believe that? In recent NHL history there is no example when an elite player along turn things around. However, there are plenty of just the opposite. EDM is an example that no elite player or players, for that matter, can do a turn around along; and TBL is an example of that a turn around requires a complex approach, organizational change coming first, CHI and PIT are in that category too.

dahlin-mahlin... wtf? who said he can fix anything?! just look at edm... the problem is in the organization. it's been populated by morons.

Wings take this one 7-3. Tatar scores all 10 goals in the game: 3 in the first, 3 in second for wings. 3 for preds in 3rd after being traded for 1st and set of Carrie Underwood CDs. He also scores an EN for red wings, just for sake of good memory. Crazy game.

nhl.com read does it mean he was traded in the middle of the game or he was so awful they decided to get rid of him asap?

who is Sidney Crosby? Did you mean Cindy Crosby?

15 pages of watch... TL;DR Have the fellow forumers come to a conclusion? Is he lazy, does he suck?