• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Yzerfan75

10/13 GDT: Red Wings 3, Hurricanes 1

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

And your rebuttal is a personal attack as opposed to logic. Those posts are always indication of what logic you have left to argue with.

You didn't give me anything to rebuttal other than you had some smart ass comment.

The second goal was a result of that whole line. Not just Hossa and Datysuk. I guess I'm wrong for thinking a goal involving excellent passing between everyone on the ice is better than just Hossa and Datsyuk??? Especially in terms of "meshing."

Like you said though, it's all personal interpretation. So you think a goal involving a whole line isn't as important as just two people. Hey, that's your prerogative.

Edited by dallas27

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You didn't give me anything to rebuttal other than you had some smart ass comment.

The second goal was a result of that whole line. Not just Hossa and Datysuk. I guess I'm wrong for thinking a goal involving excellent passing between everyone on the ice is better than just Hossa and Datsyuk??? Especially in terms of "meshing."

Like you said though, it's all personal interpretation. So you think a goal involving a whole line isn't as important as just two people. Hey, that's your prerogative.

I dont know what youre arguing for. Im talking about Datsyuk and Hossas chemistry. Because Datsyuk passed the puck to Lidstrom, who passed the puck to Rafalski, who passed the puck to Hossa says nothing about Hossa and Datsyuks chemistry. Hence the reason why I listed the succession of the passing. Just because Datsyuk and Hossa were both involved in the play - as was everyone else on the ice - doesnt mean they look good together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You didn't give me anything to rebuttal other than you had some smart ass comment.

The second goal was a result of that whole line. Not just Hossa and Datysuk. I guess I'm wrong for thinking a goal involving excellent passing between everyone on the ice is better than just Hossa and Datsyuk??? Especially in terms of "meshing."

Like you said though, it's all personal interpretation. So you think a goal involving a whole line isn't as important as just two people. Hey, that's your prerogative.

While the second goal was indeed very nice, it does not make up for the constant sloppiness of that line while on even strength. Its cool they scored, but they still look like they need a lot of work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now