12/10: San Jose Sharks @ Vancouver Canucks

[Hockeytown Red Wings 245]

Sharks fan?

When the puck goes over the line it SHOULD be a goal no matter how much you like or dislike a team. You'd think with today's technology that this kind of s*** wouldn't happen.

I wish I could have a passionate opinion about this. Alas, Time Warner is more interested in making sure I have Lifetime HD than NHL network.

[ComradeWasabi 109]

Both teams should have gotten called for too many men there.

San Jose finally gets called for a penalty.

During the last Vancouver game I watched the guys at Sportsnet said that Vancouver had taken 9 too many men on the ice penalties this year. And he blamed it on the Sedin twins being identical, which made me think, and I can just picture it: Daniel or Henrik skates to the bench for a change, two guys each assume that he is the one who is supposed to go on for the Sedin coming off, wind up with 6 on the ice. Whoops.

Also, for the sake of my fantasy team, I'm glad Sundin scored.

[Datsyerberger 279]

I wish I could have a passionate opinion about this. Alas, Time Warner is more interested in making sure I have Lifetime HD than NHL network.

But don't you want to watch generic B chick flicks?

[edicius 3,269]

Wow. Nice crack in the glass there.

[edicius 3,269]

But don't you want to watch generic B chick flicks?

Well, at least they don't have Crosby on Lifetime HD. Yet.

(Sorry, couldn't resist. )

[Hockeytown Red Wings 245]

But don't you want to watch generic B chick flicks?

The man and his evil penis are wrong, the woman triumphs. Plot for every Lifetime movie, no need to watch.

Edited January 11, 2009 by Hockeytown Red Wings

[Statts 4]

Sharks fan?

When the puck goes over the line it SHOULD be a goal no matter how much you like or dislike a team. You'd think with today's technology that this kind of s*** wouldn't happen.

Nope, I bleed red and white.

I believe the call on the ice was no goal. From the replays I saw, I could not say that the puck crossed the line completely.

Edit: by the way you are reacting, are you a nucks fan?

Edited January 11, 2009 by Statts

[Heroes of Hockeytown 694]

Bah, humbug.

[edicius 3,269]

Nope, I bleed red and white.

I believe the call on the ice was no goal. From the replays I saw, I could not say that the puck crossed the line completely.

I'll concur. There was no white between the puck and the goal line, thus no goal.

Ugh, Sharks goal. Nice D, Vancouver.

[Statts 4]

Wow

I know Thornton is more of a playmaker, but how do you not shoot in that situation?

[dat's sick 1,002]

hmph. I thought I saw a kicking motion.

[Guest MrSandMan]

Nope, I bleed red and white.

I believe the call on the ice was no goal. From the replays I saw, I could not say that the puck crossed the line completely.

Edit: by the way you are reacting, are you a nucks fan?

I'm a HOCKEY fan. So if that makes me a fan of Canucks too, then yes. I am. Though this is the 5 or 6 times I watch the canucks this year and watched SJ more than a dozen. You decide

Edit: Year = season

Edited January 11, 2009 by MrSandMan

[Wingsallwin 0]

Am I the only guy who think this game is pretty bored? Well not really bored, but not really an exciting game at all.

[Guest MrSandMan]

hmph. I thought I saw a kicking motion.

Subsequently, that would have been a no-goal if it was any other team in that same play. What bulls***

[Hockeytown Red Wings 245]

So with all the talk of goals, no goals, kicks...just what is the score?

Mind you, I could look this up any number of places, but I'm relying on you guys out of spite.

EDIT: Three minutes and no response....I can see you guys are all in here. Just do it, hit the reply button.

Edited January 11, 2009 by Hockeytown Red Wings

[Statts 4]

I'm a HOCKEY fan. So if that makes me a fan of Canucks too, then yes. I am. Though this is the 5 or 6 times I watch the canucks this year and watched SJ more than a dozen. You decide

You're an over reactor?

It was a close call, but the ref is on the ice and said the puck did not cross the line. The repays I saw did not show beyond a reasonable doubt that the puck crossed the line. sorry dude, no goal.

[HenrikRules40 14]

So with all the talk of goals, no goals, kicks...just what is the score?

Mind you, I could look this up any number of places, but I'm relying on you guys out of spite.

3-2 SJ.

[Hockeytown Red Wings 245]

3-2 SJ.

Gracias. Strange you being the voice of reason.

[dat's sick 1,002]

nevermind

Edited January 11, 2009 by dat's sick

[HenrikRules40 14]

Gracias. Strange you being the voice of reason.

*middle finger*

[Guest MrSandMan]

So with all the talk of goals, no goals, kicks...just what is the score?

Mind you, I could look this up any number of places, but I'm relying on you guys out of spite.

EDIT: Three minutes and no response....I can see you guys are all in here. Just do it, hit the reply button.

SJ and refs/goal judges 3

Nucks 2

It should be a 3-2 game with Nucks on top...

[edicius 3,269]

Bloody hell. This one's done.

[dat's sick 1,002]

and...it's over

[Hockeytown Red Wings 245]

*middle finger*

Only my friends flip me off, thanks!

[Heroes of Hockeytown 694]

Done and done.