PTI gives hockey/Red Wings no love
#1
Posted 28 April 2009 - 08:08 AM
#2
Posted 28 April 2009 - 08:18 AM

#3
Posted 28 April 2009 - 08:19 AM
They don't care about hockey. Even Mr. Chicago, Michael Wilbon will not talk about the Hawks until they are in the SCF.
If they didn't take the time to mention Torts getting suspended or Brashear getting suspended or Avery getting suspended... they ain't talking about hockey.
Of course, I have no idea if they talked about these subjects because I don't waste time watching PTI for hockey.
...or Around the Horn either.
Imma let you finish, and your cap numbers are all good and all that, but imma let Kenny figure it out. Kenny's cap numbers were the best cap numbers this year.
#4
Posted 28 April 2009 - 08:21 AM

I LIVE IN TEXAS SO I DON'T DESERVE HOCKEY
#5
Posted 28 April 2009 - 08:22 AM
The good news is that this is 2009 and ESPN isn't the only place for sports coverage. It's all out there, you just have to go and get it.
#6
Posted 28 April 2009 - 08:23 AM
People People People. Think about it hockey isn't on ESPN. they aren't going to hype the hell out of it when they don't even have it. They talked about hockey a lot (lets not forget NHL2Nite). Now they don't have it. Its like being mad because Pepsi isn't hyping up Diet Coke in their commercials.
#7
Posted 28 April 2009 - 08:36 AM
Haven't watched much ESPN this year, it will always bother me how a goal you'll see once a year will be 6th of the Top 10 behind 5 catches in baseball/dunks in basketball you will see 3 times a game.
Edited by b.shanafan14, 28 April 2009 - 08:37 AM.
#8
Posted 28 April 2009 - 08:52 AM
Bottom line is watch for what it is.... this show is why the E is in the name of the network.
- Al Swearengen
#9
Posted 28 April 2009 - 09:19 AM
Haha, yeah, that Yankee-Red Sox series has been going on for years now.
What gets me is how often they talk about baseball when it's the middle of the off-season. I can understand NFL coverage for the Draft, but other than that there's not much to talk about in that department. They could give hockey a little love, but at least on their radio side, the hosts often admit they know nothing about hockey and then proceed to make a joke about it, despite it being about as popular as the NBA which they talk about non-stop.
New e-book: The Spanish-American War: A Brief History. Relatively short, introductory read for casual history buffs and people who want to learn more about a forgotten war that changed America. Available at BN.com, Smashwords, Kobo, and Diesel E-Books right now. Same link as above.
#10
Posted 28 April 2009 - 09:33 AM
What gets me is how often they talk about baseball when it's the middle of the off-season. I can understand NFL coverage for the Draft, but other than that there's not much to talk about in that department. They could give hockey a little love, but at least on their radio side, the hosts often admit they know nothing about hockey and then proceed to make a joke about it, despite it being about as popular as the NBA which they talk about non-stop.
Not bloody likely.

#11
Posted 28 April 2009 - 10:42 AM
Oh wait - it's on ESPN

#12
Posted 28 April 2009 - 10:51 AM
#13
Posted 28 April 2009 - 11:15 AM
#14
Posted 28 April 2009 - 11:53 AM
About halfway through this past regular season NHL attendance was above NBA attendance. Don't know how it ended up, but I'd like somebody to do the stats on North American attendance and TV ratings for this year comparing NBA and NHL.
I know that last year's SCF had higher ratings in Detroit than the Pistons Conference Final letdown. That says a little something, especially since the Palace has bragged about selling out but doesn't pull in the same ratings when hockey is finally on network TV.
Since the NHL is still recovering from the lockout, I'd say in a few years it won't be "not bloody likely" and very possibly the same. I'm assuming that TV ratings for NBA are skyward compared to the NHL, but I'd like to know what kind of ratings playoff hockey draws on NBC compared to playoff basketball. The media screws the NHL out of ratings by simply not giving it the same consideration throughout the season. All hockey gets is a few Sunday after church time slots until the playoffs get down to brass tax. Maybe they've done the market research, but I think hockey has real potential to eclipse basketball for a North American audience (Canada semi-balances out the ratings for the southern states with no NHL team).
I love hockey so much, I hate that so many people make fun of it simply because it's the cool, ESPN thing to do. I have grown to hate ESPN so much. Spring baseball gets more air time than hockey. I can understand the tradition with baseball, but come on people, the sport should've decreased in popularity like movies when TV came out. Hockey actually has non stop action. I did a write up on why US audiences like baseball, football and basketball more than the international favorites like hockey, soccer and rugby.
Basically, I think the pace (easier to follow what's going on) has a lot to do with why either it's stop and start action (football, baseball) or a non stop scoring fest (basketball) for U.S. audiences. Either we need clear cut direction or a spectacle of dunks. Hockey and soccer have a similar pace to each other (for god's sake don't think I'm considering them similar sports) and it's just way too different than the U.S favorites. You have to actually understand the strategy as it plays out and pay attention at all times or you'll miss the great plays. Football and baseball have carefully planned strategy that has pauses so attention isn't always needed. Basketball has so many awe-inspiring scoring opportunities that if you miss one you're bound to see 10 more.
Sorry for the rant, I just wish more people respected hockey. It's one of the toughest sports out there and should appeal to an American audience if only they could pay attention long enough. I could go on and on, but I'll just save it for some random essay. Datsyuk picking somebody's pocket is as exciting to me as LeBron dunking. I guess Datsyuk just suffers from the lack of a booming sound when he executes his magic.
#15
Posted 28 April 2009 - 11:55 AM
#16
Posted 28 April 2009 - 12:00 PM
#17
Posted 28 April 2009 - 12:24 PM
True true to that. Hockey and indoor soccer have many similarities including on the fly substitutions and using the boards to move the puck/ball. When i used to play indoor soccer you get a delay of game for hitting the ball out of bounds from the defensive third, it didnt result in a penalty but a direct kick close to the goal. Many soccer fans also love hockey because its so similar
#18
Posted 28 April 2009 - 12:26 PM
Are you from the Metro Detroit region? Where did you play indoor soccer? Do they have amateur adult leagues?
#19
Posted 28 April 2009 - 12:43 PM
The lowest rated NBA Finals ever were in 2007 at 6.2. The highest-rated Stanley Cup Finals this decade were '02 and '08 (imagine that) at 3.6 and 3.2, respectively.
Last year, the NBA was at 9.3 and the NHL at 3.2.
Don't get me wrong - I'm not disrespecting hockey. But the cold hard facts are that the NHL just can't touch the NBA for ratings.

#20
Posted 28 April 2009 - 01:30 PM
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pinned WCSF Game 4 GDT- 5/23 - Chicago Blackhawks @ Detroit Red Wings 8:00 PM |
General Discussion | FlashyG |
|
|
|
Signed
Wings Sign D Mattias Backman today per DRW twitter |
General Discussion | St. Michael (the Red Wing) |
|
|
|
Another reason why Red Wings fans are awesome. |
General Discussion | RedLightGoesOn |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














