wingsownnhl43 14 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 (edited) would be our......... 5th defensemen... ??? enough said. Edited May 27, 2009 by wingsownnhl43 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zata20 4 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 That's dumb. At least 3rd, maybe 2nd. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dabura 12,232 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Wouldn't play for us; doesn't know how to play defense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingsownnhl43 14 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 I easily take Lidstrom and Rafalski over him.. probably Kronwall, and with the way Stuart has been playing this playoffs... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EuroTwin 240 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 I believe the OP was implying that Gonchar would "play for us" the same way Campbell is "playing for us" right now. Or at least that's what I got out of it, which made me laugh. Remember kids, there is no D in Gonchar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zata20 4 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 (edited) I guess I would take Rafalski over him, and I wouldn't want him over kronner or stewie. The thing is if he was on our team he would be higher on the depth chart then kronner and stewie. EDIT: I would take Lids over him in a heart beat, who wouldn't? Edited May 27, 2009 by zata20 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zion 93 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 I am normally quick to judge "Hey, WTF is with all of the 1-star ratings on these threads?", but this one is acceptable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dabura 12,232 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 I'd take Kronwall or Stuart over him in a heartbeat. He's a tiny forward who plays defense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zata20 4 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 I'd take Kronwall or Stuart over him in a heartbeat. He's a tiny forward who plays defense. Since when is 6-2, 212 tiny? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dabura 12,232 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 He plays a tiny man's game. He's one of the reasons I laugh when people get on Mule's case for being "soft." Also, I'm 6'4. So just about everyone's tiny to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ltgator333 3 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Irregardless of size the guy isn't physically imposing in any way. And I wouldn't take him over any D we have right now. Not even Lebda. The guy doesn't play D, he's a PP quarterback more or less. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zata20 4 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 He plays a tiny man's game. He's one of the reasons I laugh when people get on Mule's case for being "soft." Also, I'm 6'4. So just about everyone's tiny to me. , but ya i agree with u on the tiny man's game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chrisdetroit 189 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 That's dumb. At least 3rd, maybe 2nd. I'm with you. He's not better than Lids and I think that Ralfi is marginally better than Gonchar so I'd say our 3rd. I think Gonchar is better than Kroner but not dramatically so, the their is Big E, ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BewareThePenguin 1 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 would be our......... 5th defensemen... ??? enough said. Have the Wings made the finals yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BeeRYCE 2 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 I actually like Gonchar... His offense is known as good, but his defense is underrated. It also really speaks a lot about him considering the Pens became elite again at the latter part of the season with his presence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Have the Wings made the finals yet? Do the Pens play in the West? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mjlegend 155 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Does the Pope s*** in the woods? You have chosen to ignore all posts from: BewareThePenguin. · View this post · Un-ignore BewareThePenguin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingsdiehard13 33 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Wouldn't play for us; doesn't know how to play defense. Mathieu Schneider played for us Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dabura 12,232 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Mathieu Schneider played for us Touché, good sir. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rocket Queen 30 1 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Wouldn't play for us; doesn't know how to play defense. sounds about right... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reds4Life 51 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Gonchar is better than Rafalski. He would be our no.2 easily. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ifonlyicouldskate 11 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 I wouldn't mind having him about 5 years ago. Today if he were on our team, 3rd behind ralfs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
McCartyFanForLife 17 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Gonchar is better than Rafalski. He would be our no.2 easily. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeverForgetMac25 483 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Homer Alert! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rocket Queen 30 1 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Gonchar is better than Rafalski. He would be our no.2 easily. better at what? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
