Guest Lidstromboli Report post Posted December 10, 2009 looked like bert pushed it in when conklin had it covered Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Statts 4 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 Good call I say Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Detroit # 1 Fan 2,204 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 I hate the NHL, no wonder the league is such a ******* joke, we've been screwed game in and game out this year. I love the fans, give it to that lives in his mothers basement f***! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
syntax 359 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 Hilarious, Babcock is 1,000,000% uninterested in what the zebras have to say nowadays. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueMonk 102 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 I'm okay with that being called a dead play. I'm not okay with a 4 minute high sticking penalty being ignored where the Detroit player is bleeding all over the ice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyphoenix 153 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 I agree that it shouldn't have been a goal after that, but what the hell took the refs so long to blow the whistle? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
XxGoWingsxX 0 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 THREE f***S BY THE REFS....in just under 3 minutes....you could literally make an hour long montage of intent to whistle calls going against the wings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixer 37 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 I feel for the fans at the Joe who have to watch this crap! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marty Barry 230 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 If we could get Mickey to drink during the telecasts he would be Bob Euker. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lookalive07 251 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 Listening to the stream. What. The. f***?! They really need to nix this ******* rule. LMAO!!! I heard the "bulls***" chant too. Ken Kal: "You can hear the chant in the background, no need to repeat what they're saying.." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegerkin 189 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 EAT s*** AND DIE EVERY REFEREE AND GARY BETTMAN. YOU HAVE RUINED HOCKEY. DETROIT, YOU COULDN'T BEAT THE s*** OUT OF YOUR OWN UNDERWEAR. f*** YOU ALL. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixer 37 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 I think Conklin was telling Bert how much he sucks, lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
XxGoWingsxX 0 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 I agree that it shouldn't have been a goal after that, but what the hell took the refs so long to blow the whistle? Shouldn't have been a goal? He took too long to blow the whistle...and the play is NOT DEAD until the whistle blows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ShanahanMan 473 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 Hockey gods hate Detroit Gotta agree with the call though.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Third Man In 2,091 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 There's a lot less controversy if Bert just buries the friggin' puck the first time like he should have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WorkingOvertime 536 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 Again.....Seriously? We seem to get screwed by that rule more times than the rest of the league combined. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sureWhyNot 19 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 (edited) Bertuzzi Sucks! STFU, Dan Cleary has miffed about 4 different breakways this year and I don't see anyone jumping down his throat. BTW, it wasn't a goal. While it sucks bc we have has so many legitimate goals called back in the past, this one was actually covered up and more or less dead. Edited December 10, 2009 by sureWhyNot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jollymania 162 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 (edited) these refs blow literally, but the no goal looked like a legit call Edited December 10, 2009 by jollymania Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Third Man In 2,091 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 Shouldn't have been a goal? He took too long to blow the whistle...and the play is NOT DEAD until the whistle blows. There's always the dreaded 'intent to blow' rule. But that was the right call there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest lilja4mvp Report post Posted December 10, 2009 2nd and 3rd calls were the right calls...just incredibly bad timing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Lidstromboli Report post Posted December 10, 2009 THREE f***S BY THE REFS....in just under 3 minutes....you could literally make an hour long montage of intent to whistle calls going against the wings. we could probably have a montage of the goals they've pushed in from under the goalie's pads because they can't roof it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcom007 1,465 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 Sometimes I just don't know what to say...we certainly are not getting too many breaks these days... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dat's sick 1,002 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 *wings player comes in on net* *looks* *aims* *looks again* *aims* *shoots in goalie's chest* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VM1138 1,921 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 I'm okay with that being called a dead play. I'm not okay with a 4 minute high sticking penalty being ignored where the Detroit player is bleeding all over the ice. Yeah, what was up with that? Then seconds later WE get a penalty for hooking? It's not that the hooking wasn't a penalty but that if they let an egregious thing go that results in blood, and then call a chintzy thing, this is retarded. The nongoal made me mad at first, but I guess I see their point. The rule is stupid, though. All players on the ice keep playing until they hear the whistle blow. Conks obviously didn't have control of it. Players chip away at prostrate goalies pads on the goal line all the time and it counts, I don't really see what was so bad about this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
XxGoWingsxX 0 Report post Posted December 10, 2009 the problem with that rule that saved conks from a penalty is HE WASN'T SHOOTING...he was passing the puck around the boards Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
