Jump to content


Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

SJ 7 men on ice for GW OT goal


  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

#1 wingsfan_54

wingsfan_54

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 127 posts
  • Location:hamilton ontario

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:16 AM

In the overtime last night, SJ had 7 men on the ice with possession of the puck. Here is the proof. 16-6 calls against Detroit last 2 games and they can't call this 1 on SJ either. I swear Bettman and the nhl is against the wings. f*** sakes.

Attached Files


Edited by wingsfan_54, 05 May 2010 - 10:18 AM.


#2 Jasper84

Jasper84

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Gold Booster
  • 2,729 posts

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:18 AM

The two from the back are going to the bench. The two in front of them just came on the ice and are not in the play. To me, that's not too many men.

Edited by Jasper84, 05 May 2010 - 10:22 AM.


#3 Trapt1307

Trapt1307

    Tootoo + Hem = Win

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,043 posts
  • Location:Livonia, MI

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:18 AM

Wow...that hurts.

:(
"Scotty hated the world and treated everybody the same, from me to Steve Yzerman,'' Legace said. ''Scotty would rip anybody, and had the personality of ant."

#4 Aussie_Wing

Aussie_Wing

    Mursak

  • Bronze Booster
  • 8,550 posts
  • Location:Adelaide, Australia

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:20 AM

The two from the back are going to the bench. The two in front of them just came off and are not in the play. To me, that's not too many men.

This is what I was going to say.

They perhaps could have been a little quicker in getting off, but it's probably not worthy of a call.

Ken Holland: Hes (Mursak) a young guy, provides energy, can skate, hes a puck hound.


#5 Pavrik Zettersyuk

Pavrik Zettersyuk

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 205 posts

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:21 AM

The two from the back are going to the bench. The two in front of them just came off and are not in the play. To me, that's not too many men.


The penalty is a technicality it doesn't matter where they are. If San Jose has posession and is making forward progress with the puck, and there's more than 6 (including goalie) guys on the ice, it's a penalty.

#6 wingsfan_54

wingsfan_54

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 127 posts
  • Location:hamilton ontario

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:22 AM

they still ahd possession of the puck, and they're all the way back at the Det bench, so it shoul dstill be a penalty. had Detroit done this, ppl woul dbe crying foul

#7 Lidstromboli

Lidstromboli

    buncha geezers

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,454 posts
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:25 AM

http://www.nhl.com/i...ge.htm?id=26485

Posted Image


#8 micah

micah

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,345 posts

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:26 AM

they still ahd possession of the puck, and they're all the way back at the Det bench, so it shoul dstill be a penalty. had Detroit done this, ppl woul dbe crying foul


I'm sorry, but have you ever watched a hockey game bofore? The way that this line change went is consistant with the way that the Wings, sharks and every single other NHL team change lines and have been permitted to change lines since I can remember. This is not a case of too many men. You're grasping at straws.
"It was pretty interesting," said Detroit coach Mike Babcock. "We had May in exhibition for a couple of games and no one gets hacked or whacked. When we don't have him, we get run. We don't have a team that twists off helmets at stoppages. You get tired of seeing it all the time. It's just nice when you get someone to look after that stuff."

#9 Third Man In

Third Man In

    Ready to rage.

  • HoF Booster
  • 4,820 posts
  • Location:The Internet

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:28 AM

This thread is ricockulous. That looks like every legal line change in the history of the game.

"When you're a Detroit Red Wing, you don't want to go anywhere." -Kris Draper
Duty Calls


#10 wingsfan_54

wingsfan_54

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 127 posts
  • Location:hamilton ontario

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:30 AM

I'm a die hard fan and watch all their games thanks :-). Read the rules stated. http://www.nhl.com/i...e.htm?id=26485. There have been 25, i repeat TWENTY FIVE to many men calls in the playoffs already this year, so no it's not permitted. You mjust be within 5 feet of the bench, hell they're half way to the Detroit bench let alone the SJ bench, so yes it is a penalty. SJ had possession of the puck. So maybe you should wake up and start reading the rules before casting down on others.


I'm sorry, but have you ever watched a hockey game bofore? The way that this line change went is consistant with the way that the Wings, sharks and every single other NHL team change lines and have been permitted to change lines since I can remember. This is not a case of too many men. You're grasping at straws.



#11 Lidstromboli

Lidstromboli

    buncha geezers

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,454 posts
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:33 AM

where the HELL were the dumas Refz and there mesuring sticks?!?!?!?! :thumbdown: :angry: :ranting: :ranting: *** buttman

Posted Image


#12 micah

micah

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,345 posts

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:34 AM

I'm a die hard fan and watch all their games thanks :-). Read the rules stated. http://www.nhl.com/i...e.htm?id=26485. There have been 25, i repeat TWENTY FIVE to many men calls in the playoffs already this year, so no it's not permitted. You mjust be within 5 feet of the bench, hell they're half way to the Detroit bench let alone the SJ bench, so yes it is a penalty. SJ had possession of the puck. So maybe you should wake up and start reading the rules before casting down on others.



I am aware of the text of the rule, including the "at the discretion of the referee" part. That is there to make the game safer. Players are routinely permitted to coast to the bench from distances greater than 5 feet because if they were at a sprint for a line change in the area of the benches, players would get hurt. Too Many Men is called when there are too many men on the ice with the intent of influencing the play. That is not the case here and that's why it wasn't called. This is how it always is.
"It was pretty interesting," said Detroit coach Mike Babcock. "We had May in exhibition for a couple of games and no one gets hacked or whacked. When we don't have him, we get run. We don't have a team that twists off helmets at stoppages. You get tired of seeing it all the time. It's just nice when you get someone to look after that stuff."

#13 RedWingAbner

RedWingAbner

    My Loony Bun Is Fine, Benny Lava

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,316 posts

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:35 AM

Way to take away the pass, Rafalski.

#14 micah

micah

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,345 posts

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:37 AM

where the HELL were the dumas Refz and there mesuring sticks?!?!?!?! :thumbdown: :angry: :ranting: :ranting: *** buttman


Did you ever notice how they don't even make Crosby leave the ice at all, he can just take the occasional breather at center ice there are 5 Penguins in the play, then he jumps back into the play to cherry pick? That's how he scores all his goals. They always zoom in on the offensive zones so you really can't tell on TV. Bettman and Obama ordered it to be that way.
"It was pretty interesting," said Detroit coach Mike Babcock. "We had May in exhibition for a couple of games and no one gets hacked or whacked. When we don't have him, we get run. We don't have a team that twists off helmets at stoppages. You get tired of seeing it all the time. It's just nice when you get someone to look after that stuff."

#15 Namtaru

Namtaru

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 119 posts
  • Location:Chicago, IL

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:39 AM

eh, both teams do that the whole game

#16 Ram

Ram

    Goose

  • Bronze Booster
  • 754 posts
  • Location:Midtown

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:43 AM

where the HELL were the dumas Refz and there mesuring sticks?!?!?!?! :thumbdown: :angry: :ranting: :ranting: *** buttman

:hehe:

"Hey @Datsyuk13 really bro? On my bday...cmonnnn.. Someone fix that ice in the corner.." - @logancouture


#17 SouthernWingsFan

SouthernWingsFan

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 24,609 posts
  • Location:Mandeville, Louisiana (Greater New Orleans area)

Posted 05 May 2010 - 10:43 AM

In the overtime last night, SJ had 7 men on the ice with possession of the puck. Here is the proof. 16-6 calls against Detroit last 2 games and they can't call this 1 on SJ either. I swear Bettman and the nhl is against the wings. f*** sakes.

As pitiful as the officiating has been this series and this game as well, teams do this all the time and it doesn't justify a penalty. The Wings themselves blew this game, not external forces.

#18 pavyaz19

pavyaz19

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 556 posts

Posted 05 May 2010 - 11:08 AM

They really never call that unless the puck is near / touched by one of the extra players.

I'd rather complain about Rafalski not taking away the pass in this situation. It might as well have been a 2 on 0.

#19 mjtm77

mjtm77

    mjtm77

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 962 posts

Posted 05 May 2010 - 11:11 AM

Nice shot Williams
Posted Image

#20 GoWings1905

GoWings1905

    Beat Boston!

  • Gold Booster
  • 4,989 posts
  • Location:Near Toledo, OH

Posted 05 May 2010 - 11:15 AM

We probably have plenty of collective gripes that are worthy of throwing at the officials, but this just isn't one of them.

I'm more mad at our six-million dollar man on defense forgetting the fundamentals of playing a 2-on-1. You have to make Thornton shoot there...
 
 
15
 
 

 

 

 

 






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users