• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Hockeytown0001

3/20 GDT : Wild 4 at Red Wings 2

Rate this topic

399 posts in this topic

So, uh...

After that period, I am sure a lot of you guys and gals are reconsidering your stance on allowing coaches a challenge each game, eh?

In the thread a few weeks back, I remember the vast majority, pretty much everyone here, was against allowing coaches a challenge each game.

This is the EXACT situation, which I pointed out in that thread, why we DO need to allow coaches a challenge. Because when a good goal is called back due to a refs bad/wrong on ice call, it is non-reviewable. Seems even the commentators forgot about that, as they kept talking about how it would be counted as Tootoos good goal, despite the ref calling it off...

Edited by sleepwalker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh you wanted him to set up a play with 7 seconds left? Lol

Hah no, but that guy can never seem to miss a guy's stick/leg when he has one standing in front of him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was an awful call. Wings got screwed. That should have been a goal. War room should review.

They just explained why they "couldn't" review it. And from what I understand, the ref STILL screwed up, because Miller HAD NO PART in touching the puck. I hope the Wings get really really ticked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching Lafs blow out TB 4-0 and the game is not even half over. LOL poor Steve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They just explained why they "couldn't" review it. And from what I understand, the ref STILL screwed up, because Miller HAD NO PART in touching the puck. I hope the Wings get really really ticked.

Well, almost everyone here, as evidenced by the thread the other week about allowing challenges, is in favor of this blown refs call and disallowing the good goal. I was one of the only people pointing out that this exact situation is why we need to allow coaches to challenge a refs call. For "non-reviewable" calls like this...

Hockeymom1960 and evilmrt like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No s***, can we please just get Tatar back up already? I'd really love it if every time I said, "man he's got good hands" about a rookie it was immediately before or after a goal.

I'm not talking about Nyquist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dammit Kronwall.

Out of all the people you could pick to lay out, you pick on some kid no one here cares about. Do that to Parise or Heatley .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ed Olczyk is an unbearable human.

Is that the name of the guy pretending like he knows something about this game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So where all the people at crying when other have high hits? Where are you now? Kronwall with a high hit and left his feet. What do you people have to say now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was the right call. He hit him high and had his stick up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0