• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
Guest EZBAKETHAGANGSTA

Eklunds at it again.

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest EZBAKETHAGANGSTA

He says were looking at Bryan Beard due to the fact that jason williams hasent been effective on the pont (AMEN!)

I think its bs. Your thoughts?

www.Hockeybuzz.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we want a one eyed defencemen, who would come from a divisional rival, who can't play D to save his life,....i swear sometimes i think he hits the random button and see's what comes out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he tells us that every player is comeing to the wings for anther player, he's bound to be right one time! He would have had better luck winning those tickets to tonights game then he does with his rumors. Personally I think Eklund is bettmans wife they're both clueless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's gathering RUMORS and presenting them. He gets them from dozens of sources. In a typical year, I'm sure GM's entertain hundreds of possible moves, and discuss all of them - it's the logical way to ensure you get what you need, and get a damn fine deal out of it as well.

Eklund isn't "THESE ARE THINGS THAT WILL HAPPEN", Eklund is "THESE ARE THINGS THAT MIGHT HAPPEN OR HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED BY CLUBS".

So agree with the idea, disagree, whatever, but I see no reason to question Eklund, he's not the guy making these calls, he's just an intermediate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we want a one eyed defencemen, who would come from a divisional rival, who can't play D to save his life,....i swear sometimes i think he hits the random button and see's what comes out.

We can call him cyclops, nm thats just mean! I would have taken pre-eye injury but now hes a liability and we dont need an offensive defenseman we have like 3-4 already! If we get him we have nobody I want to see sit out for him. Yea the only d we need is an upgrade of that defensive cone we have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this