Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Quebec City getting new arena


  • Please log in to reply
125 replies to this topic

#1 MacK_Attack

MacK_Attack

    Old School

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,676 posts
  • Location:Ontario

Posted 05 September 2010 - 11:18 PM

Quebec City is on the verge of being one step closer to adding and NHL team.

QMI Agency is reporting that Quebec Premier Jean Charest will meet with Quebec City mayor Regis Labeaume next Tuesday to talk about the financing for a new arena.

The report states that Charest will then announce that the province will put up $400 million to help pay for the facility.


http://www.sportsnet.../report_quebec/

#2 Octopus's Garden

Octopus's Garden

    1st Line Sniper

  • Gold Booster
  • 816 posts
  • Location:Ann Arbor, MI

Posted 05 September 2010 - 11:25 PM

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2010/09/05/report_quebec/


Good. The NHL should take a team back there. Hopefully one of the terrible current franchises like Atlanta.

#3 MulesWillFly93

MulesWillFly93

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 729 posts
  • Location:So Cal

Posted 05 September 2010 - 11:57 PM

I don't see how it benefits a place like Québec City to go into debt to build a new arena when they've already got one. Yeah, it's old, but they could update it like the Oilers have (as someone mentioned in the comments). It's not like they need to try extra hard to lure the people there into going to games with the bait of a state-of-the-art facility; I'd imagine that the rabid, hockey-starved fanbase would show up come hell or high water at this point. And hey, if they really want a new one, why not just hang out at the old one for a few years, keep costs down, and then build a new one with money in hand?

And why the heck does the League care either way as long as it meets minimal standards? Do they profit from this in some way I don't understand? And why is QC so eager to do this when Bettman has been yanking around Winnipeg, who has already built a new, NHL-spec arena, for a while now?

As for an actual opinion, I'd love to see QC and Winnipeg both get new teams, especially since Winny has already built an arena and QC is going to; I'd hate to see them go through all the trouble and then have Bettman thumb his nose at them. Winnipeg Coyotes and Québec City Thrashers FTW! :sly:

Edited by MulesWillFly93, 06 September 2010 - 12:00 AM.

Nobody lives forever.
Some things never die.
Like up in the land of ice and snow,
They tell me that a Red Wing always flies.
RIP Ruslan Salei - Brad McCrimmon - Stefan Liv - Lokomotiv Yaroslavl
(Orig. lyrics - Ray Wylie Hubbard, "Airplane Fell Down in Dixie")


#4 Z and D for the C

Z and D for the C

    This is the TBL forum, right?

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,026 posts
  • Location:D, Michigan

Posted 06 September 2010 - 12:05 AM

I'm curious, being that both Quebec and Winnipeg just recently had teams leave because of financial issues, why do people want teams there again? It's been proven that they can't support NHL teams. Unless I'm missing something, I just don't get it. It's like saying we should elect Bush again.

The teams left there for a reason, there is no reason to put them back where they failed already. I'd rather see a team in Seattle or Kansas.

Edited by Z and D for the C, 06 September 2010 - 12:08 AM.

Just cause you look like the gimp don't mean you play like the gimp!


#5 T-Ruff

T-Ruff

    BAMF

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,726 posts
  • Location:Ontario

Posted 06 September 2010 - 12:32 AM

I'm curious, being that both Quebec and Winnipeg just recently had teams leave because of financial issues, why do people want teams there again? It's been proven that they can't support NHL teams. Unless I'm missing something, I just don't get it. It's like saying we should elect Bush again.

The teams left there for a reason, there is no reason to put them back where they failed already. I'd rather see a team in Seattle or Kansas.

The biggest difference between now and then is that the Canadian dollar is back on par, as opposed to being 65 cents or whatever back when they had to move. A team in Quebec City would be a very low risk move, certainly much less so than Kansas. I fully expect the NHL to expand to 32 teams within the decade adding good markets like Quebec and shifting around some other one(s) if they don't work out (Atlanta seems like the best candidate at the moment). FTR I like Seattle as a home for a team one day.

Edited by T-Ruff, 06 September 2010 - 12:33 AM.


#6 F.Michael

F.Michael

    Old School Dynamic Duo

  • HoF Booster
  • 7,525 posts
  • Location:Wisconsin

Posted 06 September 2010 - 12:59 AM

I don't see how it benefits a place like Québec City to go into debt to build a new arena when they've already got one. Yeah, it's old, but they could update it like the Oilers have (as someone mentioned in the comments). It's not like they need to try extra hard to lure the people there into going to games with the bait of a state-of-the-art facility; I'd imagine that the rabid, hockey-starved fanbase would show up come hell or high water at this point. And hey, if they really want a new one, why not just hang out at the old one for a few years, keep costs down, and then build a new one with money in hand?

And why the heck does the League care either way as long as it meets minimal standards? Do they profit from this in some way I don't understand? And why is QC so eager to do this when Bettman has been yanking around Winnipeg, who has already built a new, NHL-spec arena, for a while now?

As for an actual opinion, I'd love to see QC and Winnipeg both get new teams, especially since Winny has already built an arena and QC is going to; I'd hate to see them go through all the trouble and then have Bettman thumb his nose at them. Winnipeg Coyotes and Québec City Thrashers FTW! :sly:

Having a shiny new toy always catches the eyes of Bettman, and his minions (the BOG).

I'm curious, being that both Quebec and Winnipeg just recently had teams leave because of financial issues, why do people want teams there again? It's been proven that they can't support NHL teams. Unless I'm missing something, I just don't get it. It's like saying we should elect Bush again.

The teams left there for a reason, there is no reason to put them back where they failed already. I'd rather see a team in Seattle or Kansas.

Atlanta had a team back in the early 1980's, ditto for Colorado, and so did the Bay area in California, but that didn't stop the league from going back there now did it?

It's not like the locals didn't support the teams; these 2 clubs in Winnipeg, and Quebec City were financially at a disadvantage due to the dollar difference, and being smaller markets didn't help either.

Now I won't say that these 2 potential re-location canidates will never have future financial woes, but looking at Phoenix, Nashville, Atlanta, Florida, and even the NYI - I dunno if they'd do any worse...Keep the league at 30 teams - re-location is the key.

'Evolution' created by Offsides

#7 CenterIce

CenterIce

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,989 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 06:13 AM

Now I won't say that these 2 potential re-location canidates will never have future financial woes, but looking at Phoenix, Nashville, Atlanta, Florida, and even the NYI - I dunno if they'd do any worse...Keep the league at 30 teams - re-location is the key.


Unfortunately, if the league adds new cities, it will probably be expansion teams.

#8 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,610 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 06 September 2010 - 07:34 AM

They've already poked around the Federal government regarding funding for a new arena and were told no.

"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#9 Shady Ultima

Shady Ultima

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 584 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 01:20 PM

I'm curious, being that both Quebec and Winnipeg just recently had teams leave because of financial issues, why do people want teams there again? It's been proven that they can't support NHL teams. Unless I'm missing something, I just don't get it. It's like saying we should elect Bush again.

The teams left there for a reason, there is no reason to put them back where they failed already. I'd rather see a team in Seattle or Kansas.


The reason they left was not primarily financial reasons either. Where in the US, the State could fund new arenas, Canada's Federal Government refuses funding for arenas.

The old Winnipeg and Quebec stadiums closed because they needed a new arena, and were unable to build one.

In fact, I seem to remember seeing a report somewhere, that the Nordiques had the second highest attendance average in the league up until they were sent packing. I don't believe that either of the teams were financial drains like the Coyotes, Thrashers, Panthers and Nashville.

#10 wings1110

wings1110

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,147 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 04:31 PM

as long as the league doesnt add any NEW teams im happy if u wanna move franchises fine but 30 teams should be the limit


also....how the f*** are these citys getting financing when they dont even have a team and they may not get one, yet detroit cant get financing and we have the most successful team in hockey?

Edited by wings1110, 06 September 2010 - 04:34 PM.


#11 Tane

Tane

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 326 posts
  • Location:Windsor, On

Posted 06 September 2010 - 05:12 PM

I'm curious, being that both Quebec and Winnipeg just recently had teams leave because of financial issues, why do people want teams there again? It's been proven that they can't support NHL teams. Unless I'm missing something, I just don't get it. It's like saying we should elect Bush again.

The teams left there for a reason, there is no reason to put them back where they failed already. I'd rather see a team in Seattle or Kansas.


It wasn't really financial trouble perse.....

It was back in the free trade era, when they'd have to offer a player 13-14 million in order to compete with a team like the wings that only hade to pay 10 million. (or 7 million to match a 5 million offer) Now, with the Cap, that shouldn't be an issue anymore.

Also, It was Back in an era where the owner of the team was the owner of the team, and could up and move his team if he wished. Minnesota had great attendance and is right up there as the most rabid hockey City in America. It's not that they couldn't support the team, it's that Ted Green figured he could get Better TV money in a bigger market like Dallas, and Bigger corporate sponsorship. Back then, an owner could move his team, if he thought there'd be more money elsewhere. That's what happened in Hartford, Winnipeg and Quebec City. It was the individual owners who could decide to sell or move as they wished.

I hate Bettman, and I'm convinced Bettman hates Canada. To his credit, Gary Bettman saw this as a problem, and in order to protect the remaining franchises like Pittsburgh, Ottawa, Buffalo, Calgary and Edmonton, He changed the process, to where a move would have to be approved by the league and Owners. As much as I would have liked to see Phoenix move up to Hamilton, it just doesn't work that way anymore. It's Bettman's new rules that prevent a private sale and relocation of a franchise, the way it happened in the Former NHL cities. Sure, all those teams relocated under Bettman's watch, but he did something to stop it from happening more. And he IS doing what he can to keep franchises where they are. Good move, Good Idea, about 15 years too late. Hopefully they can only take so much of the bleeding in the non Hockey markets and get the NHL back to where it should be.

#12 miller76

miller76

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Gold Booster
  • 2,718 posts
  • Location:Newport Beach, CA

Posted 06 September 2010 - 05:19 PM

QC and Winnipeg can have all the nice arenas private funding can by. But without a corporate partner and fat television revenues guaranteed, it's not going to happen. Bettman isn't going out of his way to make it happen either. Even though ticket sales are poor in Phoenix, Nashville, Atlanta, and Columbus, they have good tv contracts, and solid corporate partnerships.

Edited by miller76, 06 September 2010 - 05:19 PM.

lighten up people, it's the internet!

#13 Dominator2005

Dominator2005

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,222 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 06:27 PM

40% of money that NHL made (last 2-3 seasons) are coming from Canadian teams...

There are 50 000 of Quebec Nordiques fans (according to http://www.nordiquesnation.com/) and Phoenix has something like 200, Islanders 220...


Relocation is fine - NO TO EXPANSION

QC and Winnipeg can have all the nice arenas private funding can by. But without a corporate partner and fat television revenues guaranteed, it's not going to happen. Bettman isn't going out of his way to make it happen either. Even though ticket sales are poor in Phoenix, Nashville, Atlanta, and Columbus, they have good tv contracts, and solid corporate partnerships.




http://en.wikipedia...._Karl_Péladeau

He's very interested in Nordiques...

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2010/09/05/report_quebec/



That's what I told you couple of weeks ago.

They've already poked around the Federal government regarding funding for a new arena and were told no.



False, Stockwell Day said no regarding funding for a NHL TEAM not a new arena. Josée Verner said that they are going to put money on a new arena.

http://fullcomment.n...-nordiques-fan/
"Some guys dream about scoring goals, or making big saves... I swear to God I dream about kicking ass in a hockey fight - no other way to say it than I love to do it, its who I am"... Brian McGrattan

#14 _Kabrok_

_Kabrok_

    Top Prospect

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 56 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 07:28 PM

QC and Winnipeg can have all the nice arenas private funding can by. But without a corporate partner and fat television revenues guaranteed, it's not going to happen. Bettman isn't going out of his way to make it happen either. Even though ticket sales are poor in Phoenix, Nashville, Atlanta, and Columbus, they have good tv contracts, and solid corporate partnerships.


Um, David Thomson is co-owner of the largest media conglomerate in Canada, which includes TSN. The rumored ownership group for a potential QC team would be headed by Quebecor, which is also a huge media corporation in Quebec and is in the process of expanding west. These people OWN the networks the tv contracts are signed to in the first place. Corporate partnerships for the MTS already have a huge waiting list, and partners waiting in line is only going to increase as the city's inland port project develops.

I'm curious, being that both Quebec and Winnipeg just recently had teams leave because of financial issues, why do people want teams there again? It's been proven that they can't support NHL teams. Unless I'm missing something, I just don't get it. It's like saying we should elect Bush again.

I'm not sure I'd call 15+ years 'just recently'. The NHL and the North American economy in general has changed dramatically in that time, largely in favour of reestablishment of Canadian teams. Plus there's plenty of precedent for the reestablishment of teams in markets that have supposedly been 'proven' to be unsuitable.

Edited by _Kabrok_, 06 September 2010 - 07:33 PM.


#15 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,610 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 06 September 2010 - 08:12 PM

False, Stockwell Day said no regarding funding for a NHL TEAM not a new arena. Josée Verner said that they are going to put money on a new arena.


False; from Montreal Gazette :

Quebec City shouldn't look to a deficit-fighting federal government to help fund a new arena that would enable it to lure back a National Hockey League franchise, Treasury Board President Stockwell Day said yesterday.
...


The only way the federal government would provide funding to Quebec City would be with regards to a bid on the Winter Olympic Games. That would be on the entire package and not just a new arena. That would also be a long time from now, long after the proposed return of the NHL to Quebec City for the third time.

"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#16 CaliWingsNut

CaliWingsNut

    PeeWee Bettman

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,744 posts
  • Location:Sonoma County, CA

Posted 06 September 2010 - 10:29 PM

Quebec City's metro population ( 715,515 or 725,000 depending on your source) has about 300,000 less people than Edmonton (the current smallest NHL market).


How much smaller/cheaper than Edmonton (a Canadian team) can we make it and have it still work? and why would the NHL want to?

Figures don't lie, but liars sure figure. - Mark Twain


#17 Dominator2005

Dominator2005

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,222 posts

Posted 07 September 2010 - 01:32 AM

False; from Montreal Gazette :



The only way the federal government would provide funding to Quebec City would be with regards to a bid on the Winter Olympic Games. That would be on the entire package and not just a new arena. That would also be a long time from now, long after the proposed return of the NHL to Quebec City for the third time.




That's exatcly what I've said!


EDIT: Why negative "feedback"???

Edited by Dominator2005, 07 September 2010 - 11:48 AM.

"Some guys dream about scoring goals, or making big saves... I swear to God I dream about kicking ass in a hockey fight - no other way to say it than I love to do it, its who I am"... Brian McGrattan

#18 Dominator2005

Dominator2005

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,222 posts

Posted 07 September 2010 - 05:41 AM

Quebec City's metro population ( 715,515 or 725,000 depending on your source) has about 300,000 less people than Edmonton (the current smallest NHL market).


How much smaller/cheaper than Edmonton (a Canadian team) can we make it and have it still work? and why would the NHL want to?



NHL welcome to Mexico City (that was same logic used by Bettman when he decided to expend NHL).

Quebec Remparts (QMJHL) average attendance is 12 088 (fans) which is very good when you compare with the quality of the league.
http://www.lhjmq.qc....e&subfilter_id=
"Some guys dream about scoring goals, or making big saves... I swear to God I dream about kicking ass in a hockey fight - no other way to say it than I love to do it, its who I am"... Brian McGrattan

#19 F.Michael

F.Michael

    Old School Dynamic Duo

  • HoF Booster
  • 7,525 posts
  • Location:Wisconsin

Posted 07 September 2010 - 08:27 AM

Quebec City's metro population ( 715,515 or 725,000 depending on your source) has about 300,000 less people than Edmonton (the current smallest NHL market).


How much smaller/cheaper than Edmonton (a Canadian team) can we make it and have it still work? and why would the NHL want to?

The NHL has faired far worse in much larger cities on this side of the border, and like others have already said - a significant portion of the league's revenue comes outta Canada.

With the cap in place, a solid fan base, and "good/smart" owners/mgt - there's no reason why a city like Winnipeg, or Quebec City cannot ice a competitive, and financially viable team.

They really couldn't do worse than what we already have in Phoenix/Nashville/Atlanta/etc/etc

'Evolution' created by Offsides

#20 F.Michael

F.Michael

    Old School Dynamic Duo

  • HoF Booster
  • 7,525 posts
  • Location:Wisconsin

Posted 07 September 2010 - 08:34 AM

QC and Winnipeg can have all the nice arenas private funding can by. But without a corporate partner and fat television revenues guaranteed, it's not going to happen. Bettman isn't going out of his way to make it happen either. Even though ticket sales are poor in Phoenix, Nashville, Atlanta, and Columbus, they have good tv contracts, and solid corporate partnerships.

Dunno if I'd call NBC/VS/local FOX cable a "fat tv contract", but then again my definition may be different than yours.

Last I've heard there have been some legit business partners looking into bringing back teams to Winnipeg/Quebec City.

'Evolution' created by Offsides





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users